Discreet fermenters: Community organising, professional ethos, and ‘grassroots lobbying’ in Chicago

References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, K. T., & Edwards, B. (2004). Advocacy organizations in the US political process. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 479–506. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauvallet, W., & Michon, S. (2017). Dans l’ombre des élus: Une sociologie des collaborateurs politiques. Presses universitaires du Septentrion.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Asher, M., & bat Sarah, K. (2018). Organizing + lobbying = power tool. Social Policy, 48(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bereni, L. (2021). The women’s cause in a field: Rethinking the architecture of collective protest in the era of movement institutionalization. Social Movement Studies, 20(2), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1679107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergan, D. E. (2009). Does grassroots lobbying work?: A field experiment measuring the effects of an e-mail lobbying campaign on legislative behavior. American Politics Research, 37(2), 327–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X08326967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bherer, L., Gauthier, M., & Simard, L. (2017). The professionalization of public participation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2001). Langage et pouvoir symbolique. Éditions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. (2002). Ethnicity without groups. European Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975602001066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnes, N. (2018). The cash ceiling: Why only the rich run for office – and what we can do about it. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chauvin, S. (2007a). Le worker center et ses spectres: Les conditions d’une mobilisation collective des travailleurs précaires à Chicago. Sociologies Pratiques, 15(2), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.3917/sopr.015.0041
   Google Scholar
• Chauvin, S. (2007b). Intérim industriel et mouvements de journaliers à Chicago [Thèse de doctorat en sociologie]. EHESS.
   Google Scholar
• Clemens, E. (1997). The people’s lobby: Organizational innovation and the rise of interest group politics in the United States, 1890-1925. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cluverius, J. (2017). How the flattened costs of grassroots lobbying affect legislator responsiveness. Political Research Quarterly, 70(2), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916688110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cluverius, J. (2021). Grass-roots lobbying and the provision of information-processing resources in state legislatures. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 27(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2020.1860618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Y. (2013). Le siècle des chefs: Une histoire transnationale du commandement et de l’autorité, 1890-1940. Éditions Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Desmond, M. (2014). Relational ethnography. Theory and Society, 43(5), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9232-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doussard, M., & Fulton, B. (2020). Organizing together: Benefits and drawbacks of community-labor coalitions for community organizations. Social Service Review, 94(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1086/707568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doussard, M., & Lesniewski, J. (2017). Crossing boundaries, building power: Chicago organizers embrace race. Ideology, and Coalition. Social Service Review, 91(4), 585–620. https://doi.org/10.1086/694692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufour, P. (2021). Comparing collective actions beyond national contexts: ‘Local spaces of protest’ and the added value of critical geography. Social Movement Studies, 20(2), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1732199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossmann, M. (2012). The not-so-special interests: Interest groups, public representation, and American governance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Han, H., McKenna, E., & Oyakawa, M. (2021). Prisms of the people: Power & organizing in twenty-first-century America. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Internal Revenue Service. (2019, May 13). Social Welfare Organizations. https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/other-non-profits/social-welfare-organizations
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S. (2002). Organizing, advocacy, and member power: A critical reflection. WorkingUSA, 6(2), 56–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-4580.2002.00003.x-i1
   Google Scholar
• Jerolmack, C., & Khan, S. (2014). Talk is cheap: Ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(2), 178–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114523396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleidman, R. (2004). Community organizing and regionalism. City & Community, 3(4), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1535-6841.2004.00096.x
   Google Scholar
• Kollman, K. (1998). Outside lobbying: Public opinion and interest group strategies. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurens, S. (2018). Lobbyists and bureaucrats in Brussels: Capitalism’s brokers. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. (2015). Do-it-yourself democracy: The rise of the public engagement industry. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Walker, E. T., & McQuarrie, M. (2015). Democratizing inequalities. Dilemmas of the new public participation. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefèvre, S. (2011). ONG & Cie: Mobiliser les gens, mobiliser l’argent. PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Lichterman, P. (2020). How civic action works: Fighting for housing in Los Angeles. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marwell, N. P. (2007). Bargaining for Brooklyn: Community organizations in the entrepreneurial city. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, L. (2021). The space of social movements. Social Movement Studies, 20(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1630267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGerr, M. (2005). A fierce discontent: The rise and fall of the progressive movement in America, 1870-1920. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minkoff, D. C. (1994). From service provision to institutional advocacy: The shifting legitimacy of organizational forms. Social Forces, 72(4), 943–969. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischi, J. (2011). Gérer la distance à la « base ». Les permanents CGT d’un atelier SNCF. Sociétés Contemporaines, 84(4), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.3917/soco.084.0053
   Google Scholar
• Mischi, J. (2016). Le Bourg et l’atelier: Sociologie du combat syndical. Agone.
   Google Scholar
• Montanaro, L. (2012). The democratic legitimacy of self-appointed representatives. The Journal of Politics, 74(4), 1094–1107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, Z. (2009). The making of pro-life activists: How social movement mobilization works. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ollion, É. (2015). Des mobilisations discrètes: Sur le plaidoyer et quelques transformations de l’action collective contemporaine. Critique Internationale, 67(2), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.3917/crii.067.0017
   Google Scholar
• Orr, M. (2007). Transforming the city: Community organizing and the challenge of political change. University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Petitjean, C. (2019). Des professionnel·le·s de la représentation populaire: Les community organizers à Chicago [Thèse de doctorat en sociologie]. Université Paris-Saclay.
   Google Scholar
• Petitjean, C., & Talpin, J. (2022). Tweets and Doorknocks. Differentiation and Cooperation between Black Lives Matter and Community Organizing. Perspectives on Politics, 1–15. doi:10.1017/S1537592722001049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusch, L. (2012). Going Regional: The Evolution of an Organizing Strategy in Detroit. City & Community, 11(1), 51–73. https://doi-org.ezpaarse.univ-paris1.fr/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2011.01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, D. M. (1990). Political organizing in grassroots politics. University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2009). Authorisation and authenticity: Representation and the unelected. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American Democracy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (2013). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Ashgate. (Original work published 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Sheingate, A. (2016). Building a business of politics: The rise of political consulting and the transformation of American Democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sites, W., Chaskin, R. J., & Parks, V. (2007). Reframing community practice for the 21st century: Multiple traditions, multiple challenges. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(5), 519–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. (2004). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talpin, J. (2016). Community organizing: De l’émeute à l’alliance des classes populaires aux États-Unis. Raisons d’agir.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, E. T. (2009). Privatizing participation: Civic change and the organizational dynamics of grassroots lobbying firms. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, E. T. (2014). Grassroots for hire: Public affairs consultants in American Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhouse, B. C. (2014). Lobbying America: The politics of business from Nixon to NAFTA. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar