Common sense put to work: The capitalisation of affects in the introduction of a Lean management model to healthcare professionals

References

• Aij, K. H., & Teunissen, M. (2017). Lean leadership attributes: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 31(7–8), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2016-0245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. (1992). The description of technical objects. In W. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 205–225). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society, 2(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beyes, T., & Steyaert, C. (2011). Spacing organization: Non-representational theory and performing organizational space. Organization, 19(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411401946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman, L., & Venn, C. (2010). Affect. Body & Society, 16(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X09354769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, T. (2004). The transmission of affect. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N. (2006). Mechanisms of hope: Maintaining the dream of the rational organization. Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A. (1999). The ethnographic self: Fieldwork and the representation of identity. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. City Lights Books.
   Google Scholar
• Duleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management, 14(3), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969409387823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espeland, W., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1086/517897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. (2019). Theorizing affective ethnography for organization studies. Organization, 26(6), 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418805285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herranen, O., & Vaden, T. (2017). Arkiymmärrys ja omavaraisuus: Havaintoja yhdestä omavaraistaloutta koskevasta keskustelusta [Common sense and self-sufficiency: Findings from one debate on the subsistence economy]. Kulttuurintutkimus, 34(2–3), 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hirvonen, H., Mankki, L., Lehto, I., & Jokinen, E. (2020). Ammatillinen toimijuus lean-ajattelussa [Professional agency in Lean thinking]. In J. Kantola, P. Koskinen-Sandberg, & H. Ylöstalo (Eds.), Tasa-arvopolitiikan suunnanmuutoksia (pp. 243–261). Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Jorma, T., Tiirinki, H., Bloigu, R., & Turkki, L. (2016). Lean thinking in Finnish healthcare. Leadership in Health Services, 29(1), 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-08-2015-0021
   Google Scholar
• Kantola, A. (2014). Branded revolutionaries: Circulated gurus as management tools in soft capitalism. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(3), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413508750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karppi, T., Kähkönen, L., Mannevuo, M., Pajala, M., & Sihvonen, T. (2016). Affective capitalism: Investments and investigations. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 16(4), 1–13. https://ephemerajournal.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/16-4editorial.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Katila, S., Laine, P.-M., & Parkkari, P. (2019). Sociomateriality and affect in institutional work: Constructing the identity of start-up entrepreneurs. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617743591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolehmainen, M. (2019). Affective assemblages: Atmospheres and therapeutic knowledge production in/through the researcher-body. In S. Salmenniemi, J. Nurmi, H. Bergroth, & I. Perheentupa (Eds.), Assembling therapeutics: Cultures, politics and materiality (pp. 43–57). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351233392.
   Google Scholar
• Kolehmainen, M., & Juvonen, T. (2018). Introduction: Thinking with and through affective inequalities. In T. Juvonen, & M. Kolehmainen (Eds.), Affective inequalities in intimate relationships (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kolehmainen, M., & Mäkinen, K. (2019). Affective labour of creating atmospheres. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(2), 448–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549419886021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A., & McCoy, K. (2010). Thinking with Deleuze in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 503–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.500634
   Google Scholar
• McCann, L., Hassard, J. S., Granter, E., & Hyde, P. J. (2015). Casting the lean spell: The promotion, dilution and erosion of lean management in the NHS. Human Relations, 68(10), 1557–1577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714561697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morini, C., & Fumagalli, A. (2010). Life put to work: Towards a theory of life-value. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 10(3–4), 234–252. https://ephemerajournal.org/sites/default/files/10-3morinifumagalli.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortner, S. (2006). Anthropology and social theory: Culture, power, and the acting subject. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paju, E., Näre, L., Haikkola, L., & Krivonos, D. (2019). Human capitalisation in activation: Investing in the bodies, selves and skills of unemployed youth in Finland. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 7(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2019.1689834
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 17–50). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seigworth, G. J., & Gregg, M. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In M. Gregg, & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 1–25). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfert, R. (2012). Beyond personal feelings and collective emotions: Toward a theory of social affect. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(6), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412438591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvennoinen, H., & Lindberg, M. (2015). Aikuiskoulutukseen osallistuminen Suomessa [Participating in adult education in Finland]. Aikuiskasvatus, 35(4), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.33336/aik.94156
   Google Scholar
• Thedvall, R. (2017). Affective atmospheres of hope: Management model training in public reforms. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 6(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-01-2017-0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadel, C. C. (2015). Participatory work-along as an apprentice-a qualitative research tool in studying organizations and work practices. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 5(3a), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v5i3a.4835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Womack, J., & Jones, D. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ylä-Anttila, T., & Luhtakallio, E. (2016). Justifications analysis: Understanding moral evaluations in public debates. Sociological Research Online, 21(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.4099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar