1,304
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Managing the crisis: International organisations’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic as legitimation work

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 402-428 | Received 17 Dec 2021, Accepted 22 Mar 2023, Published online: 30 Mar 2023

References

  • Alasuutari, P. (2015). The discursive side of new institutionalism. Cultural Sociology, 9(2), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514561805
  • Alasuutari, P. (2018). Authority as epistemic capital. Journal of Political Power, 11(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2018.1468151
  • Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.2.177
  • Bexell, M., Jönsson, K., & Stappert, N. (2020). Whose legitimacy beliefs count? Targeted audiences in global governance legitimation processes. Journal of International Relations and Development 24(2), 483–508. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00199-4.
  • Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (Eds.). (1999). Constructing world culture: International nongovernmental organizations since 1875. Stanford University Press.
  • Brandtner, C. (2021). Decoupling under scrutiny: Consistency of managerial talk and action in the age of nonprofit accountability. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764021995240.
  • Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.684462
  • Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Wiley.
  • Capano, G., Howlett, M., Jarvis, D. S., Ramesh, M., & Goyal, N. (2020). Mobilizing policy (in) capacity to fight COVID-19: Understanding variations in state responses. Policy and Society, 39(3), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628
  • Debre, J. M., & Dijkstra, H. (2021). COVID-19 and policy responses by international organizations: Crisis of liberal international order or window of opportunity? Global Policy, 12(4), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12975
  • Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J., Tost, L. P., & Suchman, M. C. (2017). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, & R. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 27–54). SAGE.
  • Dingwerth, K., Witt, A., Lehmann, I., Reichel, E., & Weise, T. (2019). International organizations under pressure: Legitimating global governance in challenging times. Oxford University Press.
  • Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2018a). International organizations “going public”? An event history analysis of public communication reforms 1950–2015. International Studies Quarterly, 62(4), 723–736. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqy025
  • Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2018b). Self-legitimation in the face of politicization: Why international organizations centralized public communication. The Review of International Organizations, 13(4), 519–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-017-9287-y
  • Ferguson, N., Laydon, D., Nedjati-Gilani, G., Imai, N., Ainslie, K., Baguelin, M., Bhatia, S., Boonyasiri, A., Cucunubá, Z., & Cuomo-Dannenburg, G. (2020). Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand. Imperial College London, 10, 77482. https://doi.org/10.25561/77482
  • Halliday, T. C., Block-Lieb, S., & Carruthers, B. G. (2010). Rhetorical legitimation: Global scripts as strategic devices of international organizations. Socio-Economic Review, 8(1), 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwp024
  • Hurd, I. (2019). Legitimacy and contestation in global governance: Revisiting the folk theory of international institutions. The Review of International Organizations, 14(4), 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9338-z
  • Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (1996). Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 812–836. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096455
  • Lenz, T., Bezuijen, J., Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2014). Patterns of international organization. Task specific vs. general purpose. Task Specific vs. General Purpose (December 2014). Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 128.
  • Meyer, J. W., & Bromley, P. (2013). The worldwide expansion of “organization”. Sociological Theory, 31(4), 366–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113513264
  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  • Meyer, M. W. (1987). The growth of public and private bureaucracies. Theory and Society, 16(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135695
  • Ossewaarde, R., Nijhof, A., & Heyse, L. (2008). Dynamics of NGO legitimacy: How organising betrays core missions of INGOs. Public Administration and Development, 28(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.472
  • Schmitz, H. P. (2020). International NGOs: Legitimacy, mandates and strategic innovation.
  • Scholte, J. A. (2019). Sources of legitimacy in global governance. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 12(3), 47–76. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-3-47-76
  • Sebhatu, A., Wennberg, K., Arora-Jonsson, S., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020). Explaining the homogeneous diffusion of COVID-19 nonpharmaceutical interventions across heterogeneous countries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(35), 21201–21208. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010625117
  • Stroup, S. S., & Wong, W. H. (2017). The authority trap: Strategic choices of international NGOs. Cornell University Press.
  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
  • Tallberg, J., & Zürn, M. (2019). The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: Introduction and framework. The Review of International Organizations, 14(4), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9330-7
  • Ulybina, O., Ferrer, L. P., & Alasuutari, P. (2022). Intergovernmental organizations in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic: Organizational behaviour in crises and under uncertainty. International Sociology, 37(4), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809221094687
  • Verbruggen, S., Christiaens, J., & Milis, K. (2011). Can resource dependence and coercive isomorphism explain nonprofit organizations’ compliance with reporting standards? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009355061
  • Vestergaard, A. (2008). Humanitarian branding and the media: The case of amnesty international. Journal of Language and Politics, 7(3), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.3.07ves
  • Von Billerbeck, S. (2020). “Mirror, mirror on the wall:” self-legitimation by international organizations. International Studies Quarterly, 64(1), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz089
  • Wiepking, P., & Maas, I. (2009). Resources that make you generous: Effects of social and human resources on charitable giving. Social Forces, 87(4), 1973–1995. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0191
  • Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(1), 69–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971912000012
  • Zürn, M., & Stephen, M. (2010). The view of old and new powers on the legitimacy of international institutions. Politics, 30(1_suppl), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2010.01388.x