Generic evolution and the online archival catalogue

References

• Andersen, Jack. “The Concept of Genre in Information Studies.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 42, no. 1 (2008): 339–367. doi:10.1002/aris.2008.1440420115.
   Google Scholar
• Arrowsmith, Amanda J. E. “Archives.” In British Librarianship and Information Work 1986–90, edited by David W. Bromley and Angela M. Allott, 242–251. London: Library Association Publishing, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, Nicolas. “The Department of Manuscripts.” The Book Collector 45 (Spring 1996): 9–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, Diane L. “An Archival User Study: Researchers in the Field of Women's History.” Archivaria 29, no. 90 (1989–1990): 33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Berner, Richard C. Archival Theory and Practice in the United States: A Historical Analysis. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Collections Trust, and Museums Libraries and Archives (MLA). Revisiting Archive Collections: A Toolkit for Capturing and Sharing Multiple Perspectives on Archive Collections. 3rd ed. London: Collections Trust, 2009. http://www.collectionstrust.org.uk/participation/revisiting-archive-collections-a-toolkit-for-capturing-and-sharing-multiple-perspectives-on-archive-collections.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, Paul. “Facts and Frameworks: An Approach to Studying the Users of Archives.” American Archivist 49, no. 4 (1986): 393–407.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Michael, Kristina Grant, and Pat Starkey. A Manual of Archival Description. London: Society of Archivists, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Michael. “MAD2: Reassessing the Experience.” Archivaria 35, no. Spring (1993): 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Michael, and Margaret Procter. Manual of Archival Description. 2nd ed. Aldershot: Gower, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Chris. “Online On-Site: Transforming Public Services in The National Archives.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 29, no. 2 (2008): 193–206. doi:10.1080/00379810902909428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, Barbara L. “What Are the Clients? Who Are the Products? The Future of Archival Public Services in Perspective.” Archivaria 31, no. 1 (1990): 135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Crowston, Kevin. “Internet Genres.” In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, edited by Marcia Bates and Mary Niles Maak. 3rd ed. New York: Taylor and Francis, 2009. doi:10.1081/E-ELIS3-120043520.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, Amy. Writing Genres. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Jennifer, and Heather MacNeil. “The Generic Evolution of Calendars and Inventories at the Public Archives of Canada, 1882-ca. 1975.” American Archivist 77, no. 1 (2014): 151–174.
   Google Scholar
• Dowler, Lawrence. “The Role of Use in Defining Archival Practice and Principles: A Research Agenda for the Availability and Use of Records.” American Archivist 51, no. 1–2 (1988): 74–86.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, Wendy, and Verne Harris. “Stories and Names: Archival Description as Narrating Records and Constructing Meanings.” Archival Science 2, no. 3–4 (2002): 263–285. doi:10.1007/BF02435625.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, Wendy M., and Catherine A. Johnson. “Accidentally Found on Purpose: Information-Seeking Behavior of Historians in Archives.” Library Quarterly 72 (2002): 472–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, Wendy M., and Catherine A. Johnson. “Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behaviour of Genealogists.” American Archivist 66, no. 1 (2003): 79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, Wendy M., and Penka Stoyanova. “Transforming the Crazy Quilt: Archival Displays from a Users' Point of View.” Archivaria 45 (1998): 44–77.
   Google Scholar
• Dunham, Susan, Jim Geddes, and David Thomas. “The Retrospective Conversion of the Public Record Office's Catalogues.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 20, no. 2 (1999): 223–230. doi:10.1080/003798199103640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Max J. “Archives of the People, by the People, for the People.” American Archivist 79, no. 2 (2007): 387–400.
   Google Scholar
• Eveleigh, Alexandra. “Crowding out the Archivist? Locating Crowdsourcing within the Broader Landscape of Participatory Archives.” In Crowdsourcing Our Cultural Heritage, edited by Mia Ridge, 211–229. London: Ashgate, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, Sarah J. A., Matthew Hillyard, and Bill Stockting. “A2A: The Development of a Strand in the National Archives Network.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 22, no. 2 (2001): 177–191. doi:10.1080/00379810120081127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, Aviva, and Graham Smart. “Navigating the Current of Economic Policy: Written Genres and the Distribution of Cognitive Work at a Financial Institution.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 4, no. 4 (1997): 238–255. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0404_3.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Elsie T. “In the Eye of the Beholder: Archives Administration from the User's Point of View.” American Archivist 47, no. 2 (1984): 111–123.
   Google Scholar
• Garmendia, Jone. “User Input in the Development of Online Services: The PRO Catalogue.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 23, no. 1 (2002): 51–57. doi:10.1080/00379810220120555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliland-Swetland, Luke J. “The Provenance of a Profession: The Permanence of the Public Archives and Historical Manuscripts Traditions in American Archival History.” American Archivist 54, no. 2 (1991): 160–175.
   Google Scholar
• Gorton, L. J. “Arrangement and Cataloguing of Modern Historical Papers in the British Museum.” Archives 8, no. 37 (1967): 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gorzalski, Matt. “Examining User-Created Description in the Archival Profession.” Journal of Archival Organization 11, no. 1–2 (2013): 1–22. doi:10.1080/15332748.2013.866858.
   Google Scholar
• Gracy, Karen F. “Ambition and Ambivalence: A Study of Professional Attitudes Toward Digital Distribution of Archival Moving Images.” American Archivist 76, no. 2 (2013): 346–373.
   Google Scholar
• Grannum, Guy. “Harnessing User Knowledge: The National Archives, Your Archives Wiki.” In A Different Kind of Web: New Connections Between Archives and Our Users, edited by Kate Theimer, 116–127. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhorn, Beth. “Project Naming: Always On Our Minds.” In Museums and the Web: Proceedings, edited by Jennifer Trant and David Bearman. Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics, 2005  Accessed March 31, 2005. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2005/papers/greenhorn/greenhorn.html/.
   Google Scholar
• Gunton, M. J., and P. A. Raymond. “Designing and Using Archway: Experience with the Program (and MAD) to Date.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 14, no. 2 (1993): 125–133. doi:10.1080/00379819309511705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensen, Steven L. “‘NISTF II’ and EAD: The Evolution of Archival Description.” American Archivist 60, no. 3 (1997): 284–296.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Amanda. “Bringing Archives Online Through the Archives Hub.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 23, no. 2 (2002): 239–248. doi:10.1080/0037981022000006408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hooland, Seth, Eva Méndez Rodríguez, and Isabelle Boydens. “Between Commodification and Engagement: On the Double-Edged Impact of User-Generated Metadata within the Cultural Sector.” Library Trends 59, no. 4 (2011): 707–720. doi:10.1353/lib.2011.0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley, Chris. “Parallel Provenance: (1) What if Anything Is Archival Description?” Archives and Manuscripts 33, no. 1 (2005): 110–145.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, Chris. “Parallel Provenance: (2) When Something Is Not Related to Everything Else.” Archives and Manuscripts 33, no. 2 (2005): 52–91.
   Google Scholar
• Huvila, Isto. “Participatory Archive: Towards Decentralised Curation, Radical User Orientation, and Broader Contextualisation of Records Management.” Archival Science 8, no. 1 (2008): 15–36. doi:10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, Kathleen M. Hall. “Generic Constraints and the Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 6, no. 3 (1973): 162–170.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, Kathleen M. Hall. “Antecedent Genre as Rhetorical Constraint.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 61, no. 4 (1975): 406–415. doi:10.1080/00335637509383303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimerson, Randall C. “Redefining Archival Identity: Meeting User Needs in the Information Society.” American Archivist 52, no. 3 (1989): 332–340.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, Jenny. “Enacting Engagement Online: Framing Social Media Use for the Museum.” Information Technology & People 24, no. 1 (2011): 64–77. doi:10.1108/09593841111109422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, Magia Ghetu, and Elizabeth Yakel. “Interaction in Virtual Archives: The Polar Bear Expedition Digital Collections Next Generation Finding Aid.” American Archivist 70, no. 2 (2007): 282–314.
   Google Scholar
• Kwasnick, Barbara, and Kevin Crowston. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Genres of Digital Documents.” Information Technology and People 18, no. 2 (2005): 76–88. doi:10.1108/09593840510601487.
   Google Scholar
• Light, Michelle, and Tom Hyry. “Colophons and Annotations: New Directions for the Finding Aid.” American Archivist 65, no. 2 (2002): 216–230.
   Google Scholar
• Little, Hannah. “Archive Fever as Genealogical Fever: Coming Home to Scottish Archives.” Archivaria 64 (2007): 89–112.
   Google Scholar
• MacNeil, Heather. “What Finding Aids Do: Archival Description as Rhetorical Genre in Traditional and Web-based Environments.” Archival Science 12, no. 4 (2012): 485–500. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9175-4.
   Google Scholar
• MacNeil, Heather. “The Role of Calendars in Constructing a Community of Historical Workers in the Public Records Office of Great Britain ca. 1850–1950.” In Genre Theory in Information Studies, edited by Jack Andersen, 93–115. Bingley, UK: Emerald, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• MacNeil, Heather, and Jennifer Douglas. “The Generic Evolution of Calendars and Guides at the Public Records Office of Great Britain, ca. 1838–1968.” Information and Culture: A Journal of History 49, no. 3 (2014): 294–326. doi:10.1353/lac.2014.0012.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, William J. “The Use of User Studies.” The Midwestern Archivist 11 (1985): 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, Pamela H. “Like a Box of Chocolates: A Case Study of User-Contributed Content at Footnote.” American Archivist 76, no. 1 (2013): 19–46.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, Dennis. “First Things First: Reengineering Finding Aids for Implementation of EAD.” American Archivist 60, no. 4 (1997): 372–387.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Carolyn R. “Genre as Social Action.” In Genre and the New Rhetoric. Corrected reprint of 1984 article, edited by Aviva Freedman and Peter Medway, 23–42. London: Taylor and Francis, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Carolyn R. Do Genres Evolve? Bloomington: Presentation at Indiana University, 2013, November 16. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Hh3dE7phE8.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Carolyn R., and Dawn Shepherd. “Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of the Weblog.” Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and the Culture of Weblogs, edited by Laura Gurak, et al., Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Libraries, 2004. http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/blogging_as_social_action_a_genre_analysis_of_the_weblog.html.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, Jenny, and Martin Taylor. “Lowering the Drawbridge: Further Thoughts on Discriminating between Readers.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 24, no. 1 (2003): 55–64. doi:10.1080/0037981032000061037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council on Archives. Archives On-Line: The Establishment of a United Kingdom Archival Network. London: National Council on Archives, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Archives. British Archives: The Way Forward. London: National Council on Archives, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Archives. Taking Part: An Audit of Social Inclusion Work in Archives. London: National Council on Archives, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Jon. “Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 33, no. 1 (2012): 57–73. doi:10.1080/00379816.2012.666404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, Joy. “Archives 2.0: If We Build It, Will They Come?” Ariadne 60, (2009). www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue60/palmer. Accessed February 6.
   Google Scholar
• Procter, Margaret, and Michael Cook. Manual of Archival Description. 3rd ed. Aldershot, England: Gower, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, Caroline. Is Revisiting Collections Working? London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth, and Sandra Campagna. “From Print to Web 2.0: the Changing Face of Discourse for Special Purposes.” LSP Journal 2, no. 2 (2011): 44–51.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, Jill, and Paul Stembridge. Data Elements. Part A of The Catalogue: Cataloguing Guidelines. June. London: The National Archives UK, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, Jill, and Paul Stembridge. Editorial Standards Framework. Part B of The Catalogue: Cataloguing Guidelines. London: The National Archives UK, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Schryer, Catherine F. “Genre Theory and Research.” In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, edited by Marcia Bates and Mary Niles Maak. 3rd ed. New York: Taylor and Francis, 2009. doi:10.1081/E-ELIS3-120043259.
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, Anna, Chris Turner, Geoffrey Yeo, and Susan Hockey. “Understanding Users: A Prerequisite for Developing New Technologies.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 25, no. 1 (2004): 33–49. doi:10.1080/0037981042000199133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, Elizabeth. “Archives.” In British Librarianship and Information Work 1991–2000, edited by J. H Bowman, 262–281. London: Ashgate, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, Elizabeth. “Archives.” In British Librarianship and Information Work 2001–2005, edited by J. H. Bowman, 248–265. London: Ashgate, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, Elizabeth. Archives and Archivists in 20th Century England. London: Ashgate, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Stockdale, Rachel. “The Retrospective Conversion of the British Library Manuscripts' Catalogues: A Description of the Project.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 21, no. 2 (2000): 199–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, Meg, David Thomas, Bill Stockting, Matthew Hillyard, and Derek Breeden. “Redesigning Finding Aids at the Public Record Office.” Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 33, no. 3 (1999): 197–211. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theimer, Kate. “What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0?” American Archivist 74, no. 1 (2011): 58–68.
   Google Scholar
• Trace, Ciaran B., and Andrew Dillon. “The Evolution of the Finding Aid in the United States: From Physical to Digital Document Genre.” Archival Science 12, no. 4 (2012): 501–519. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9190-5.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, Susan. “Doors Opening Wider: Library and Archival Services to Family History.” Archivaria 62 (2006): 127–158.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbaugh, Roy C. “Archival Mission and User Studies.” The Midwestern Archivist 11 (1986): 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• [UK] Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Centres for Social Change: Museums, Galleries and Archives for All: Policy Guidance on Social Inclusion for DCMS Funded and Local Authority Museums, Galleries and Archives in England. London: DCMS, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• [UK] Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Libraries, Museums, Galleries and Archives for All: Co-operating Across the Sectors to Tackle Social Exclusion. London: DCMS, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• [UK] Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice. Archives for the 21st Century. London: Stationery Office, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• [UK] Museum, Libraries and Archives Council Task Force. Listening to the Past: Speaking to the Future: Report of the Archives Task Force. London: MLA Council, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• [UK] National Archives. Archives for the 21st Century in Action: Refreshed 2012–2015. London: TNA, 2012. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/archives/archives21centuryrefreshed-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• [UK] National Archives. Volunteering at The National Archives: The National Archives' Approach to User Participation. London: TNA, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• [UK] Parliament. The Voluntary Sector and Big Society. London: House of Commons, 2013. http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN05883#fullreport.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelock, Harriet. “Web 2.0 and Archival Description.” In Archives and Archivists 2: Current Trends, New Voices, edited by Ailsa C. Holland and Elizabeth Mullins, 48–62. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Yakel, Elizabeth. “Encoded Archival Description: Are Finding Aids Boundary Spanners or Barriers for Users?” Journal of Archival Organization 2, no. 1–2 (2004): 63–77. doi:10.1300/J201v02n01_06.
   Google Scholar
• Yakel, Elizabeth. “Balancing Archival Authority with Encouraging Authentic Voices to Engage with Records.” In A Different Kind of Web: New Connections between Archives and Our Users, edited by Kate Theimer, 75–101. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Yakel, Elizabeth. “Who Represents the Past? Archives, Records, and the Social Web.” In Controlling the Past: Documenting Society and Institutions, edited by Terry Cook, 257–278. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Yakel, Elizabeth, and Deborah A. Torres. “Genealogists as a ‘Community of Records’.” American Archivist 70, no. 1 (2007): 93–113.
   Google Scholar