Controlling our brains – a case study on the implications of brain-computer interface-triggered deep brain stimulation for essential tremor

References

• Melamed E, Ziv I, Djaldetti R. Management of motor complications in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company. 2007 Jan 1;22:S379–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gironell A, Kulisevsky J. Review: diagnosis and management of essential tremor and dystonic tremor. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. SAGE Publications. 2009 Jul 1;2:215–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuepbach WMM, Rau J, Knudsen K, et al. Neurostimulation for Parkinson’s disease with early motor complications. Massachusetts Med Soc. 2013 Feb 13. 387:610–22.
   Google Scholar
• Charles PD, Dolhun RM, Gill CE, et al. Deep brain stimulation in early Parkinson’s disease: enrollment experience from a pilot trial. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012 Mar;18:268–273. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ondo WG, Meilak C, Vuong KD. Predictors of battery life for the Activa® Soletra 7426 Neurostimulator. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2007 May;13:240–242. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2006.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuncel AM, Cooper SE, Wolgamuth BR, et al. Clinical response to varying the stimulus parameters in deep brain stimulation for essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2006;21:1920–1928. 10.1002/(ISSN)1531-8257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariz MI, Rehncrona S, Quinn NP, et al. Multicenter study on deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: an independent assessment of reported adverse events at 4 years. Mov Disord. 2008 Feb 15;23:416–421. 10.1002/(ISSN)1531-8257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeding HMM, Goudriaan AE, Foncke EMJ, et al. Pathological gambling after bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd; 2007 May 1;78:517–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agid Y, Schüpbach M, Gargiulo M, et al. Neurosurgery in Parkinson’s disease: the doctor is happy, the patient less so? J Neural Transm. 2006;70:409–14.
   Google Scholar
• Schüpbach M, Gargiulo M, Welter ML, et al. Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease A distressed mind in a repaired body? Neurology. 2006;66:1811–1816. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000234880.51322.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer F. Authenticity anyone? the enhancement of emotions via neuro-psychopharmacology. Neuroethics. Springer Netherlands. 2011;4:51–64. 10.1007/s12152-010-9075-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer F. Me, myself and my brain implant: deep brain stimulation raises questions of personal authenticity and alienation. Neuroethics. 2011 May 12;6:483–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylis F. ‘I Am Who I Am’: on the perceived threats to personal identity from deep brain stimulation. Neuroethics. 2011 Sep 14;6:513–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie C, Walker M. Neurotechnologies, personal identity, and the ethics of authenticity. In: Clausen J, Levy N, editors. Handbook of neuroethics. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014. p. 373–392.
   Google Scholar
• Hebb AO, Zhang JJ, Mahoor MH, et al. Creating the feedback loop. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Jan;25:187–204. 10.1016/j.nec.2013.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron J, Denison T, Chizeck HJ. Closed-loop DBS with movement intention. In: Proceedings of the 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering; 2015 Apr 22-24; Montpellier, France; p. 844–7.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie C, Stoljar N. Relational autonomy. Stoljar N, editor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers DT. Self, society, and personal choice. New York (NY): Columbia University Press; 1991. p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Leentjens A, Visser-Vandewalle V, Temel Y. Manipuleerbare wilsbekwaamheid: een ethisch probleem bij elektrostimulatie van de nucleus subthalamicus voor ernstige ziekte van Parkinson [Manipulable mental competence: an ethical problem with electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for severe Parkinson's disease]. Nederlands Tijdschrift. 2004. Dutch.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson MC, Herron J. Demonstration of a chronic brain-computer interface using a deep brain stimulator. Poster presented at: Sixth International BCI Meeting; 2016 May 30-June 3; Pacific Grove, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi PJ, Okun M, Giordano J. Translational imperatives in deep brain stimulation research: addressing neuroethical issues of consequences and continuity of clinical care. UABN. 2014;5:46–8.
   Google Scholar
• Louis ED. Medication non-adherence in essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015 Feb;21:138–141. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotte F, Larrue F, Mühl C. Flaws in current human training protocols for spontaneous brain-computer interfaces: lessons learned from instructional design. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013 Sep 17;7:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lotte F. On the need for alternative feedback training approaches for BCI. Berlin Brain-Computer Interface Workshop. Paper presented at: Berlin Brain-Computer Interface Workshop; 2012 Sep 17–19; Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Lotte F, Jeunet C. Towards improved BCI based on human learning principles. Paper presented at: 3rd International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface; 2015 Jan 12–15. South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Grübler G, Al-Khodairy A, Leeb R, et al. Psychosocial and ethical aspects in non-invasive EEG-based BCI research – a survey among BCI users and BCI professionals. Neuroethics. 2013 Feb 3;7:29–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton CA. The overlooked potential for social factors to improve effectiveness of brain-computer interfaces. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 May 6;9:693–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar