References
- Fanelli D. Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics. 2012;90(3):891–904.
- Knight J. Negative results: null and void. Nature. 2003;422:554–555.
- Vance E. Nurture negatives. Nature. 2017;552(7685): 302–302.
- Granqvist E. Looking at research from a new angle: why science needs to publish negative results. Elsevier Publishing Ethics. 2015 Oct;4:2016.
- Ioannidis JP. Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives Psychol Sci. 2012;7(6):645–654.
- Yong E. Replication studies: bad copy. Nat News. 2012;485(7398):298.
- Smith NC. Replication studies: A neglected aspect of psychological research. Am Psychologist. 1970;25(10):970.
- John LK, Loewenstein G, Prelec D. Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychol Sci. 2012;23(5):524–532.
- Alberts B, Cicerone RJ, Fienberg SE, et al. Self-correction in science at work. Science. 2015;348(6242):1420–1422.
- Firestein S. Failure: why science is so successful. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 2015.
- Krusienski DJ, Grosse-Wentrup M, Galán F, et al. Critical issues in state-of-the-art brain–computer interface signal processing. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(2):025002.
- Jayaram V, Barachant A. MOABB: trustworthy algorithm benchmarking for BCIs. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(6):066011.
- Lotte F, Bougrain L, Cichocki A, et al. A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: a 10 year update. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(3):031005.
- Jeunet C, N’Kaoua B, Lotte F. Advances in user-training for mental-imagery-based BCI control: psychological and cognitive factors and their neural correlates. Prog Brain Res. 2016;228:3–35.
- Ang KK, Chin ZY, Wang C, et al. Filter bank common spatial pattern algorithm on BCI competition IV datasets 2a and 2b. Front Neurosci. 2012;6:39.
- Lebedev MA, Ossadtchi A, Mill NA, et al. What, if anything, is the true neurophysiological significance of ”rotational dynamics”? bioRxiv. 2019 Jan;597419. Available from: http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/04/12/597419.abstract
- Churchland MM, Cunningham JP, Kaufman MT, et al. Neural population dynamics during reaching. Nature. 2012;487(7405):51–56. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22722855%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC3393826
- Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365–376. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/nrn3475
- Zllner S, Pritchard JK. Overcoming the winners curse: estimating penetrance parameters from case-control data. Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Apr;80(4):605–615. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929707610970
- Grosse-Wentrup M. What are the causes of performance variation in brain-computer interfacing? Int J Bioelectromagnetism. 2011;13(3):115–116.
- Lotte F, Larrue F, Mühl C. Flaws in current human training protocols for spontaneous brain-computer interfaces: lessons learned from instructional design. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:568.
- Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago press; 2012.
- Wood G, Kober SE. Eeg neurofeedback is under strong control of psychosocial factors. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2018;43(4):293–300.
- Roc A, Pillette L, N’Kaoua B, et al. Would motor-imagery based BCI user training benefit from more women experimenters? Proceedings of the International Graz BCI conference, Graz, Austria; 2019.
- Rimbert S, Gayraud N, Bougrain L, et al. Can a subjective questionnaire be used as brain-computer interface performance predictor? Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;12:529. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00529
- Vuckovic A, Osuagwu BA. Using a motor imagery questionnaire to estimate the performance of a brain computer interface based on object oriented motor imagery. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(8):1586–1595. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245713001120
- Marchesotti S, Bassolino M, Serino A, et al. Quantifying the role of motor imagery in brain-machine interfaces. Sci Rep. 2016;6(04):24076.
- Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. FL, USA: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida; 2008. Technical report a-8.
- Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994;25(1):49–59.
- Rimbert S, Zaepffel M, Riff P, et al. Hypnotic state modulates sensorimotor beta rhythms during real movement and motor imagery. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2341.
- Birbaumer N, Ghanayim N, Hinterberger T, et al. A spelling device for the paralysed. Nature. 1999;398(6725):297–298.
- Kübler A, Birbaumer N. Brain-computer interfaces and communication in paralysis: extinction of goal directed thinking in completely paralysed patients? Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(11):2658–2666.
- Okahara Y, Takano K, Nagao M, et al. Long-term use of a neural prosthesis in progressive paralysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16787.
- Han CH, Kim YW, Hyun SS, et al. Electroencephalography-based endogenous brain–computer interface for online communication with a completely locked-in patient. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):18.
- Hohmann M, Fomina T, Jayaram V, et al. Case series: slowing alpha rhythm in late-stage ALS patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;129(2):406–408.
- Spüler M. Questioning the evidence for BCI-based communication in the complete locked-in state. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(4):e2004750.
- Chaudhary U, Pathak S, Birbaumer N. Response to: questioning the evidence for BCI-based communication in the complete locked-in state. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(4):e3000063.
- Scherer R. Thought-based interaction: same data, same methods, different results? PLoS Biol. 2019;17(4):e3000190.
- Abbott A Prominent german neuroscientist committed misconduct in brain-reading research. Nature News. 2019. [cited 2019 Nov]. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02862-4
- Ioannidis JPA, Munaf MR, Fusar-Poli P, et al. Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 May;18(5):235–241. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661314000540
- Matosin N, Frank E, Engel M, et al. Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7(2):171.
- Blachowicz J. How science textbooks treat scientific method: a philosopher’s perspective. Br J Philos Sci. 2009 Jun;60(2):303–344.
- Jeunet C, Debener S, Lotte F, et al. Mind the traps! Design guidelines for rigorous BCI experiments. In: Nam CS, Nijholt A, Lotte F. editors. Brain-computer interfaces handbook: technological and theoretical advance. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis; 2018. p. 613–633.
- Chavarriaga R, Fried-Oken M, Kleih S, et al. Heading for new shores! Overcoming pitfalls in BCI design. Brain-Comput Interfaces. 2017;4(1–2):60–73.
- Alger BE. Hypothesis-testing improves the predicted reliability of neuroscience research. bioRxiv. 2019. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2019/02/04/537365.full.pdf
- Muthukrishna M, Henrich J. A problem in theory. Nat Human Behav. 2019 Mar;3(3):221–229.
- Varoquaux G, Raamana PR, Engemann DA, et al. Assessing and tuning brain decoders: cross-validation, caveats, and guidelines. NeuroImage. 2017;145(August2015):166–179.
- Brouwer AM, Zander TO, Van Erp JB, et al. Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state: six recommendations to avoid common pitfalls. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:136.
- Taub E. What psychology as a science owes neal miller: the example of his biofeedback research. Biofeedback. 2010 Sep;38(3):108–117. Available from: http://www.aapb-biofeedback.com/doi/abs/10.5298/1081-5937-38.3.108
- Smith PL, Little DR. Small is beautiful: in defense of the small-N design. Psychonomic Bull Rev. 2018;25(6):2083–2101.
- Saeedi S, Chavarriaga R, Millán J. Long-term stable control of motor-imagery BCI by a locked-in user through adaptive assistance. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Apr;25(4):380–391. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7801122/
- Sellers EW, Ryan DB, Hauser CK. Noninvasive brain-computer interface enables communication after brainstem stroke. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Oct;6(257):257re7. .
- Kass RE, Caffo BS, Davidian M, et al. Ten simple rules for effective statistical practice. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Jun;12(6):e1004961. Available from. .
- Colquhoun D. An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values. R Soc Open Sci. 2014 Nov;1(3):140216. Available from: http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/cgi/doi/10.1098/rsos.140216
- Antelis JM, Montesano L, Ramos-Murguialday A, et al. On the usage of linear regression models to reconstruct limb kinematics from low frequency {EEG} signals. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61976. .
- Müller-Putz G, Scherer R, Brunner C, et al. Better than random: {A} closer look on {BCI} results. Int J Bioelectromagnetism. 2008;10(1):52–55. Available from: http://www.ijbem.org/volume10/number1/100107.pdf
- Maris E, Oostenveld R. Nonparametric statistical testing of {EEG}- and {MEG}-data. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Aug;164(1):177–190. .
- Platt J. Strong inference: certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. Science. 1964;146(3642):347–353.
- Bacon F. Novum organum (gw kitchin, trans.). 1960.
- Chamberlin TC. Studies for students: the method of multiple working hypotheses. J Nutr Med. 1992;3(2):159–165.
- Klein RA, Vianello M, Hasselman F, et al. Many labs 2: investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2018;1(4):443–490.
- Foster ED, Deardorff A. Open Science Framework (OSF). J Med Lib Assoc. 2017;105(2):203.
- Pernet C, Garrido M, Gramfort A, et al. Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MEEG. 2018.
- Enriquez-Geppert S, Huster RJ, Herrmann CS. EEG-neurofeedback as a tool to modulate cognition and behavior: a review tutorial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:51.
- Ros T, Enriquez-Geppert S, Zotev V, et al. Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist). PsyRXiv. 2019. [cited 2019 Nov]. Available from: https://doiorg/1031234/osfio/nyx84
- Kübler A, Blankertz B, Müller K, et al. A model of BCI-control. Proceedings of the 5th International Graz BCI conference, Graz, Austria; 2011.
- Jeunet C, N’Kaoua B, Lotte F Towards a cognitive model of MI-BCI user training. Proceedings of the International Graz BCI conference, Graz, Austria; 2017.
- Gruzelier J. A theory of alpha/theta neurofeedback, creative performance enhancement, long distance functional connectivity and psychological integration. Cogn Process. 2009;10(1):101–109.
- Wood G, Kober SE, Witte M, et al. On the need to better specify the concept of control in brain-computer-interfaces/neurofeedback research. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:171.