References
- Kiani R, Corthell L, Shadlen MN. Choice certainty is informed by both evidence and decision time. Neuron. 2014;84:1329–1342.
- Mandler G. Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurrence. Psychol Rev. 1980;87:252.
- Rugg MD, Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11:251–257.
- Rugg MD. Memory and consciousness: A selective review of issues and data. Neuropsychologia. 1995;33:1131–1141.
- Paller KA, Voss JL, Boehm SG. Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11:243–250.
- Rugg MD, Yonelinas AP. Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7:313–319.
- Friedman D, Trott C. An event-related potential study of encoding in young and older adults. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38:542–557.
- Paller KA, Kutas M, Mayes AR. Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;67:360–371.
- Paller KA, McCarthy G, Wood CC. Erps predictive of subsequent recall and recognition performance. Biol Psychol. 1988;26:269–276.
- Hanslmayr S, Spitzer B, Bäuml K-H. Brain oscillations dissociate between semantic and nonsemantic encoding of episodic memories. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:1631–1640.
- Klimesch W, Schimke H, Doppelmayr M, et al. Event-related desynchronization (erd) and the dm effect: does alpha desynchronization during encoding predict later recall performance? Int J Psychophysiol. 1996;24:47–60.
- Paller KA, Wagner AD. Observing the transformation of experience into memory. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002;6:93–102.
- Noh E, Herzmann G, Curran T, et al. Using single-trial eeg to predict and analyze subsequent memory. NeuroImage. 2014;84:712–723.
- Fukuda K, Woodman GF. Predicting and improving recognition memory using multiple electrophysiological signals in real time. Psychol Sci. 2015;1026–1037.
- Curran T. The electrophysiology of incidental and intentionalretrieval: erp old new effects in lexical decision and recognition memory. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37:771–785.
- Curran T. Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Mem Cognit. 2000;28:923–938.
- Rugg MD, Herron JE, Morcom AM. Electrophysiological studies of retrieval processing. Neuropsychol Memory. 2002;3:154–165.
- Gherman S, Philiastides MG. Neural representations of confidence emerge from the process of decision formation during perceptual choices. Neuroimage. 2015;106:134–143.
- Poli R, Valeriani D, Cinel C. Collaborative brain-computer interface for aiding decision-making. PloS One. 2014;9:e102693.
- Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoormann J, et al. Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention. Psychophysiological Brain Res. 1990;1:192–195.
- Carter C. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection and the online monitoring of performance. Science. 1998;280:747–749.
- Krigolson OE, Holroyd CB. Hierarchical error processing: different errors, different systems. Brain Res. 2007;1155:70–80.
- Holroyd CB, Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, et al. Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential. Neuroreport. 2003;14:2481–2484.
- Miltner WH, Braun CH, Coles MG. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a “generic” neural system for error detection. J Cogn Neurosci. 1997;9:788–798.
- Weinberg A, Luhmann CC, Bress JN, et al. Better late than never? the effect of feedback delay on erp indices of reward processing. Cognit Affective Behav Neurosci. 2012;12:671–677.
- Scheffers MK, Coles MG. Performance monitoring in a confusing world: error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. J Exp Psychol. 2000;26:141.
- Boldt A, Yeung N. Shared neural markers of decision confidence and error detection. J Neurosci. 2015;35:3478–3484.
- Tzovara A, Murray MM, Bourdaud N, et al. The timing of exploratory decision-making revealed by single-trial topographic eeganalyses. NeuroImage. 2012;60:1959–1969.
- Spüler M, Niethammer C. Error-related potentials during continuous feedback: using eeg to detect errors of different type and severity. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:155.
- Curran T. Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized erp correlates of recollection and familiarity. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42:1088–1106.
- Rolls ET, Grabenhorst F, Deco G. Decision-making, errors, and confidence in the brain. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104:2359–2374.
- Daw ND, Niv Y, Dayan P. Uncertainty-based competition between prefrontal and dorsolateral striatal systems for behavioral control. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1704–1711.
- Vickers D. Decision processes in visual perception. Academic Press; 2014.
- Kubanek J, Hill NJ, Snyder LH, et al. Cortical alpha activity predicts the confidence in an impending action. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:243.
- Kiani R, Shadlen MN. Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex. science. 2009;324:759–764.
- Brady TF, Konkle T, Alvarez GA, et al. Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 14325–14329 (2008).
- Schalk G, McFarland DJ, Hinterberger T, et al. Bci2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (bci) system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51:1034–1043.
- MATLAB. version 7.10.0 (R2015b). Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc.; 2015.
- Schlögl A, Keinrath C, Zimmermann D, et al. A fully automated correction method of eog artifacts in eeg recordings. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:98–104.
- Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull. 1945;1:80–83.
- Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;65–70.
- Chang -C-C, Lin C-J. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2011;2:27:1–27:27.
- Spüler M, Walter A, Rosenstiel W, et al. Spatial filtering based on canonical correlation analysis for classification of evoked or event-related potentials in eeg data. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014;22:1097–1103.
- Combrisson E, Jerbi K. Exceeding chance level by chance: the caveat of theoretical chance levels in brain signal classification and statistical assessment of decoding accuracy. J Neurosci Methods. 2015;250:126–136.
- Haufe S, Meinecke F, Görgen K, et al. On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging. Neuroimage. 2014;87:96–110.
- Eppinger B, Kray J, Mock B, et al. Better or worse than expected? aging, learning, and the ern. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46:521–539.
- Cohen MX, Elger CE, Ranganath C. Reward expectation modulates feedback-related negativity and eeg spectra. Neuroimage. 2007;35:968–978.
- Holroyd CB, Pakzad-Vaezi KL, Krigolson OE. The feedback correct-related positivity: sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback. Psychophysiology. 2008;45:688–697.
- Arbel Y, Hong L, Baker TE, et al. It’s all about timing: an electrophysiological examination of feedback-based learning with immediate and delayed feedback. Neuropsychologia. 2017;99:179–186.
- Kübler A, Neumann N, Kaiser J, et al. Brain-computer communication: self-regulation of slow cortical potentials for verbal communication. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1533–1539.
- Spüler M, Walter C, Rosenstiel W, et al. Eeg-based prediction of cognitive workload induced by arithmetic: a step towards online adaptation in numerical learning. ZDM. 2016;48:267–278.
- Walter C, Rosenstiel W, Bogdan M, et al. Online eeg-based workload adaptation of an arithmetic learning environment. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:286.
- Sweller J, Van Merrienboer JJ, Paas FG. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev. 1998;10:251–296.