A Functional BCI Model by the P2731 working group: Physiology

References

• McFarland DJ, Wolpaw JR. EEG-based brain-computer interfaces. Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2017;4:194–200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quaresima V, Ferrari M. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for assessing cerebral cortex function during human behavior in natural/social situations: a concise review. Organizational Res Methods. 2019;22(1):58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge R, Wilson S, Coyle D. 3D graphics, virtual reality, and motion-onset visual evoked potentials in neurogaming. Prog Brain Res. 2016;228:329–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. FDA guidance for offers a compendium of the hazards associated with brain implants: implanted Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) devices for patients with paralysis or amputation - non-clinical testing and clinical considerations, May 20, 2021
   Google Scholar
• Woeppel K, Yang Q, Cui, XT. Recent advances in neural electrode–tissue interfaces. Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2017;4:21–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephan W. Invasive vs. non-invasive neuronal signals for brain-machine interfaces: will one prevail? Front Neurosci. 2016;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00295http.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena T, Karumbaiah L, Gaupp EA, et al. The impact of chronic blood-brain barrier breach on intracortical electrode function. Biomaterials. 2013 Jul;34(20):4703–4713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong G, Lieber CM. Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019;20(6):330–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei H, Lycke R, Ganji M, et al. Ultraflexible neural electrodes for long-lasting intracortical recording. iScience. 2020;23:8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihani RT, Stiller AM, Usoro JO, et al. Deployable, liquid crystal elastomer-based intracortical probes. Acta Biomater. 2020;111:54–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliemann D, Ralph Adolphs J, Tyszka M, et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity of the brain in adults with a single cerebral hemisphere. Cell Rep. 2019;29(8):2398–2407.e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carne RP, Vogrin S, Litewka L, et al. Cerebral cortex: an MRI-based study of volume and variance with age and sex. J Clin Neurosci. 2006;13(1):60–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilles K, Palomero-Gallagher N. Cyto-, myelo-, and receptor architectonics of the human parietal cortex. NeuroImage. 2001;14(1):S12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasser MF, Coalson TS, Robinson EC, et al. A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature. 2016 Aug 11;536(7615):171–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Essen DC, Drury HA, Joshi S, et al. Functional and structural mapping of human cerebral cortex: solutions are in the surfaces. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1998;95(3):788–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogolla N. The insular cortex. Curr Biol. 2017;27(12):R580–R586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern ME, Güntürkün O, Hopkins WD, et al. Lateralization of the vertebrate brain: taking the side of model systems. J Neurosci. 2005 Nov 9;25(45):10351–10357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradigms MI, Rupawala M, Dehghani H, et al. Shining a light on awareness: a review of functional near-infrared spectroscopy for prolonged disorders of consciousness. Front Neurol. 2018;Article 350:5.
   Google Scholar
• Gratton G. The contralateral organization of visual memory: a theoretical concept and a research tool. Psychophysiology. 1998;35(6):638–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sira CS, Mateer CA. Frontal Lobes. In: Aminoff MJ, Daroff RB, editors. Encyclopedia of the neurological sciences. Second ed. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2014. p. 358–365.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg ME. Parietal lobe. international encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. 2001. London, UK: Elsevier; p. 11051–11054.
   Google Scholar
• Simons JS, Johnsrude IS. Temporal lobes. In: Aminoff MJ, Daroff RB, editors. Encyclopedia of the neurological sciences. Second ed. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2014. p. 401–408.
   Google Scholar
• Rogalsky C. Chapter 47 - the role of the anterior temporal lobe in sentence processing. In: Hickok G, Small SL, editors. Neurobiology of language. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2016. p. 587–595.
   Google Scholar
• Deyoe EA, Lobe O. Encyclopedia of the human brain. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2002. p. 677–715.
   Google Scholar
• Foundas AL, Knaus TA, Shields J. Broca’s area. In: Aminoff MJ, Daroff RB, editors. Encyclopedia of the neurological sciences. Vol. 544. Second ed. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Karbe H. Note that the borders of Wernicke’s area vary in different studies, Wernicke’s area. In: Aminoff MJ, Daroff RB, editors. Encyclopedia of the neurological sciences. 2nd ed. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2014. p. 751–752.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka K. Temporal Lobe. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB, editors. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Oxford, UK: Pergamon; 2001. p. 15595–15599.
   Google Scholar
• Sheth Bhavin R, Ryan Y. Two visual pathways in primates based on sampling of space: exploitation and exploration of visual information. Front Integr Neurosci. 2016;10; pp. 1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Cana J Psychol. 1961;15(3):166–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J, Martin J. Hemispheric asymmetry of the right ear advantage in dichotic listening. Hear Res. 2004;198(1–2):125–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Essen DC, Donahue CJ, Glasser MF. Development and evolution of cerebral and cerebellar cortex. Brain Behav Evol. 2018;91(3):158–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• My-MS. The cerebrum. [cited 2021 Jul 02]. https://my-ms.org/anatomy_brain_part1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Zilles K, Palomero-Gallagher N, Amunts K. Cytoarchitecture and maps of the human cerebral cortex. In: Toga AW, editor. Brain mapping. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2015. p. 115–135.
   Google Scholar
• Sarah J, Leda D. Glial cells and their function in the adult brain: a journey through the history of their ablation. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen HT, Rhoton AL, Mussi ACM. Surgical anatomy of the brain, chap 2. In: editor, Winn HR. Youmans and winn neurological surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017.  p. 173;
   Google Scholar
• Levitan IB, Kacmarek LK. The neuron. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 33.
   Google Scholar
• Britannica. The Editors of Encyclopaedia. “Node of Ranvier”. Encyclopedia Britannica. 2021. 2018 Dec 5, https://www.britannica.com/science/node-of-Ranvier.
   Google Scholar
• Levitan IB, Kacmarek LK. The neuron. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Nutma E, Van Gent D, Amor S, et al. Astrocyte and oligodendrocyte cross-talk in the central nervous system. Cells. 2020;9(3):600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFelipe J, Fariñas I. The pyramidal neuron of the cerebral cortex: morphological and chemical characteristics of the synaptic inputs. Prog Neurobiol. 1992;39(6):566–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy PR, Bakay RA. Restoration of neural output from a paralyzed patient by a direct brain connection. Neuroreport. 1998 Jun 1;9(8):1707–1711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels J, Andreasen D, Ehirim P, et al. Neurotrophic electrode: method of assembly and implantation into human motor speech cortex. J Neurosci Methods. 2008;174(2):168–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudor M, Tudor L, Tudor KI. Hans Berger (1873-1941): povijest elektroencefalografije [Hans Berger (1873-1941): the history of electroencephalography]. Acta Med Croatica. 2005;59(4):307–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Britton JW, Frey LC, Hopp JL, et al., authors Louis EK, Frey LC, editors. Electroencephalography (EEG): an introductory text and atlas of normal and abnormal findings in adults, children, and infants [Internet]. Chicago: American Epilepsy Society; 2016. Appendix 6. A Brief History of EEG.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal J. Toward Direct Brain-Computer Communication. In: Mullins LJ, editor. Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering. Vol. 2. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, Inc.; 1973. p. 157–180.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs FA, Davis H, Lennox WG. The electro-encephanlogram in epilepsy and in conditions of impaired consciousness. Arch NeurPsych. 1935;34(6):1133–1148.
   Google Scholar
• Quaresima V, Ferrari M. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for assessing cerebral cortex function during human behavior in natural/social situations: a concise review. Organizational Res Methods. 2019;22(1):46–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American electroencephalographic society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. American Electroencephalographic Society; J Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;8(2):200–202. Journals@Ovid Full Text. Web. 28 November. 2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden DEJ. The P300: where in the brain is it produced and what does it tell us? Neuroscientist. 2005;11(6):569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines DE. Neuroanatomy: an atlas of structures, sections, and systems. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. p. 46.
   Google Scholar
• Matsushita K, Hirata M, Suzuki T, et al. A fully implantable wireless ECoG 128-channel recording device for human brain–machine interfaces: w-HERBS. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paola P, Felix S, Antonia H, et al. Current status and issues regarding pre-processing of fNIRS neuroimaging data: an investigation of diverse signal filtering methods within a general linear model framework. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;12:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupawala M, Dehghani H, Lucas S, et al. Shining a light on awareness: a review of functional near-infrared spectroscopy for prolonged disorders of consciousness. Front Neurol. 2018;Article 350:2.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton RB, Frank LR. A model for the coupling between cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism during neural stimulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1997 Jan;17(1):64–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover GH. Overview of functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011 Apr;22(2):133–9, vii.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton RB, Wong EC, Frank LR. Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: the balloon model. Magn Reson Med. 1998;39(6):855–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupawala M, Dehghani H, Lucas S, et al. Shining a light on awareness: a review of functional near-infrared spectroscopy for prolonged disorders of consciousness. Front Neurol. 2018;9(350):2–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curtin A, Ayaz H. Chapter 22 - Neural efficiency metrics in neuroergonomics: theory and applications. In: Ayaz H, Dehais F, editors. Neuroergonomics. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2019. p. 133–140.
   Google Scholar
• Quaresima V, Ferrari M. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for assessing cerebral cortex function during human behavior in natural/social situations: a concise review. Organizational Res Methods. 2019;22(1):47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehling MK, Turner R, Mansfield P. Echo-planar imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in a fraction of a second, For instance, echo-planar imaging (EPI). Science. 1991 Oct 4;254(5028):43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkum Matthew E, Petro Lucy S, Sachdev Robert NS, et al. A perspective on cortical layering and layer-spanning neuronal elements. Front Neuroanat. 2018;12:4–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropotov JD. Chapter 3.1 - Sensory systems and attention modulation. In: Kropotov JD, editor. Functional neuromarkers for psychiatry. Academic Press; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2016. p. 140–142. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410513-3.00011-5.
   Google Scholar
• Gopikrishna D, Rangaprakash D, Luke O, et al. A new generation of brain-computer interfaces driven by discovery of latent EEG-fMRI linkages using tensor decomposition. Front Neurosci. 2017;11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00246.
   Google Scholar
• Michel Christoph M, Denis B. EEG source imaging: a practical review of the analysis steps. Front Neurol. 2019;10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00325.
   Google Scholar
• Hermiller MS, Chen YF, Parrish TB, et al. Evidence for immediate enhancement of hippocampal memory encoding by network-targeted theta-burst stimulation during concurrent fMRI. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2020;40(37):7155–7168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zich C, Debener S, Kranczioch C, et al. Real-time EEG feedback during simultaneous EEG–fMRI identifies the cortical signature of motor imagery. NeuroImage. 2015;114:438–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SP. Magnetoencephalography: basic principles. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2014;17(Suppl 5):S107–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang R, Xiao W, Ding Y, et al. Recording brain activities in unshielded Earth’s field with optically pumped atomic magnetometers. Sci Adv. 2020;6(24):eaba8792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupawala M, Dehghani H, Lucas S, et al. Shining a light on awareness: a review of functional near-infrared spectroscopy for prolonged disorders of consciousness. Front Neurol. 2018;Article 350:7.
   Google Scholar
• Waldert S, Preissl H, Demandt E, et al. Hand movement direction decoded from MEG and EEG. J Neurosci. 2008;28(4):1000–1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander TH, Preusser J, Mhaskar R, et al. Magnetoencephalography with a chip-scale atomic magnetometer. Biomed Opt Express. 2012;3(5):981–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See PROFESSOR Petra Ritter’s virtual brain project: [cited 2021 Jun 25]. https://www.thevirtualbrain.org/tvb/zwei
   Google Scholar
• Kirschstein T, Köhling R. What is the source of the EEG? Clin EEG Neurosci. 2009;40(3):146–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzsáki G, Anastassiou C, Koch C. The origin of extracellular fields and currents — EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(6):407–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitan IB, Kacmarek LK. The neuron. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK, 2015. p. 34–36.
   Google Scholar
• Harilal P, Bipin N, Egidio D, et al. Computational modeling of single neuron extracellular electric potentials and network local field potentials using LFPsim. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. Vol 10, p. 1, 2016] [Pesaran B. Uncovering the mysterious origins of local field potentials. Neuron. 2009;61(1):1–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicolas-Alonso LF, Gomez-Gil J. Brain computer interfaces, a review. Sensors. 2012;12(2):1221–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, et al. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature. 2001;412(6843):150–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harilal P, Bipin N, Egidio D, et al. computational modeling of single neuron extracellular electric potentials and network local field potentials using LFPsim. Front Comput Neurosci. 2016;10:65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Nakamura KC, Charpier S. Focal inputs are a potential origin of local field potential (LFP) in the brain regions without laminar structure. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0226028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehring C, Rickert J, Vaadia E, et al. Inference of hand movements from local field potentials in monkey motor cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6(12):1253–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen RA, Musallam S, Pesaran B. Selecting the signals for a brain-machine interface. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Dec;14(6):720–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldert S, Preissl H, Demandt E, et al. Ad aertsen, carsten mehring. hand movement direction decoded from MEG and EEG. J Neurosci. 2008;28(4):1000–1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran B. Uncovering the mysterious origins of local field potentials. Neuron. 2009 Jan 15;61(1):1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandeis D, Lehmann D. Event-related potentials of the brain and cognitive process: approaches and applications. Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(1):153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropotov JD. Chapter 1.6. In: Kropotov JD, editor: Functional neuromarkers for psychiatry. Academic Press; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2016. p. 59.
   Google Scholar
• De Pascalis V. On the psychobiology of extraversion,  In R. M. Stelmack (Ed.), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honor of Marvin Zuckerman; pp. 295–298; Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044209-9/50017-8. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman GF. A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010;72(8):2031–2046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creel DJ Visually evoked potentials. Webvision, 29 Nov 2020
   Google Scholar
• Comerchero MD, Polich J. P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;110(1):24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118(10):2130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappenman ES, Farrens JL, Wendy Zhang W, et al. ERP CORE: an open resource for human event-related potential research. NeuroImage. 2021;225:117465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropotov JD. Chapter 3.1 - Sensory systems and attention modulation. In: Kropotov JD, editor. Functional neuromarkers for psychiatry. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press;; 2016. p. 66. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410513-3.00011-5.
   Google Scholar
• Marchesotti S, Martuzzi R, Schurger A, et al. Cortical and subcortical mechanisms of brain-machine
   Google Scholar
• Linden DEJ. The P300: where in the brain is it produced and what does it tell us? Neuroscientist. 2005;11(6):563–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative Theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118(10):2128–2148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan KK, Luu P, Tucker DM. Changes in P3b latency and amplitude reflect expertise acquisition in a football visuomotor learning task. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):2: e0154021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropotov JD. Chapters 1-6, 2-2, 2-3l. In: Functional neuromarkers for psychiatry. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2016. p. 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Abhang PA, Gawali BW, Mehrotra SC. Chapter 2 - Technological basics of EEG recording and operation of apparatus. In: Abhang PA, Gawali BW, Mehrotra SC, editors. Introduction to EEG- and speech-based emotion recognition. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2016. p. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Kropotov JD. Chapter 3.1 - Sensory Systems and Attention Modulation, Editor(s): Juri D. Kropotov, Functional Neuromarkers for Psychiatry, Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kropotov JD. Chapter 2.2 – alpha rhythms. In: Levy N, editor. Functional neuromarkers for psychiatry. San Diego: Academic Press; 2016. p. 89–105.
   Google Scholar
• Kropotov JD. Chapter 3 - Beta rhythms. In: Kropotov JD, editor. Quantitative EEG, event-related potentials and neurotherapy. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2009. p. 59.
   Google Scholar
• Başar E, Başar-Eroğlu C, Özerdem A, et al. Preface: application of brain oscillations to neuropsychiatric diseases: a new land? In: Başar E, Başar-Eroĝlu C, Özerdem A, et al., editors. Supplements to clinical neurophysiology. Vol. 62. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Rodriguez M, Peters J, Hill N, et al. Closing the sensorimotor loop: haptic feedback facilitates decoding of motor imagery. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(3):036005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng MY, Hung CL, Huang CJ, et al. Expert-novice differences in SMR activity during dart throwing. Biol Psychol. 2015 Sep;110:212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland DJ, Krusienski DJ, Wolpaw JR. Brain-computer interface signal processing at the Wadsworth Center: mu and sensorimotor beta rhythms. Prog Brain Res. 2006;159:411–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel AK, Fries P. Chapter 3 - Neuronal oscillations, coherence, and consciousness. In: Laureys S, Gosseries O, Tononi G, editors. The neurology of consciousness. Second ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2016. p. 51.
   Google Scholar
• Kübler A, Mattia D. Chapter 14 - Brain–computer interface based solutions for end-users with severe communication disorders. In: Laureys S, Gosseries O, Tononi G, editors. The neurology of consciousness. Second ed. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Academic Press; 2016. p. 217–240.
   Google Scholar
• Botrel L, Kübler A. Week-long visuomotor coordination and relaxation trainings do not increase sensorimotor rhythms (SMR) based brain-computer interface performance. Behav Brain Res. 2019 Oct 17;372: 111993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkadhi H, Brugger P, Boendermaker SH, et al. What disconnection tells about motor imagery: evidence from paraplegic patients. Cereb Cortex. 2005 Feb;15(2):131–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulay CB, Sarnacki WA, Wolpaw JR, et al. Trained modulation of sensorimotor rhythms can affect reaction time. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Sep;122(9):1822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapała D, Zabielska-Mendyk E, Augustynowicz P, et al. The effects of handedness on sensorimotor rhythm desynchronization and motor-imagery BCI control. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):2087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krusienski DJ, Schalk G, McFarland DJ, et al. A mu-rhythm matched filter for continuous control of a brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 Feb;54(2):273–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupawala M, Dehghani H, Lucas S, et al. Shining a light on awareness: a review of functional near-infrared spectroscopy for prolonged disorders of consciousness. Front Neurol. 2018;Article 350:5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ono T, Shindo K, Kawashima K, et al. Brain-computer interface with somatosensory feedback improves functional recovery from severe hemiplegia due to chronic stroke. Front Neuroeng. 2014;7:19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allison B, Faller J, Neuper C. BCIs that use steady-state visual evoked potentials or slow cortical potentials. In: Jonathon R Wolpaw, Elizabeth Winter Wolpaw, editors. Brain–computer interfaces: principles and practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Christoph G, Brendan A, Bernhard G, et al. How many people could use an SSVEP BCI? Front Neurosci. 2012;6:5–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han CH, Kim YW, Kim DY, et al. Electroencephalography-based endogenous brain–computer interface for online communication with a completely locked-in patient. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li T, Zhang J, Xue T, et al. Development of a Novel Motor Imagery Control Technique and Application in a Gaming Environment. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2017;2017:5863512, 16 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Axmacher N, Leszczynski M, Fell J. Cross-frequency coupling and memory. Abstracts/Clinical Neurophysiology 127 (2016) e29, Tzvetan Popov, Ole Jensen, Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen. Dorsal and ventral cortices are coupled by cross-frequency interactions during working memory. NeuroImage. 2018;178:277–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jo HG, Naranjo JR, Hinterberger T, et al. Phase synchrony in slow cortical potentials is decreased in both expert and trained novice meditators. Neurosci Lett. 2019 May 14;701: 142–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birbaumer N. Slow cortical potentials: plasticity, operant control, and behavioral effects. Neuroscientist. 1999;5(2):74–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birbaumer N, Elbert T, Canavan AG, et al. Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex and behavior. Physiol Rev. 1990;70(1):2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ute Strehl, Pascal Aggensteiner, Daniel Wachtlin, Daniel Brandeis, Bjorn Albrecht, Maria Arana, Christiane Bach, Tobias Banaschewski, Thorsten Bogen, Andrea Flaig-Rohr, Christine M. Freitag, Yvonne Fuchsenberger, Stephanie Gest, Holger Gevensleben, Laura Herde, Sarah Hohmann, Tanja Legenbauer, Anna-Maria Marx, Sabina Millenet, Benjamin Pniewski, Aribert Rothenberger, Christian Ruckes, Sonja Worz and Martin Holtmann. Neurofeedback of slow cortical potentials in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a multicenter randomized trial controlling for unspecific effects. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11; pp 12–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasslinger J, D’Agostini Souto M, Folkesson Hellstadius L, et al. Neurofeedback in ADHD: a qualitative study of strategy use in slow cortical potential training. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(6):e0233343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birbaumer N. Slow cortical potentials: plasticity, operant control, and behavioral effects. Neuroscientist. 1999;5(2):77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tort ABL, Scheffer-Teixeira R, Souza BC, et al. Theta-associated high-frequency oscillations (110–160Hz) in the hippocampus and neocortex. Prog Neurobiol. 2013 Jan;100:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tort ABL, Scheffer-Teixeira R, Souza BC, et al. Theta-associated high-frequency oscillations (110–160Hz) in the hippocampus and neocortex. Prog Neurobiol. 2013;100:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkawadri R, Gaspard N, Goncharova II, et al. The spatial and signal characteristics of physiologic high frequency oscillations. Epilepsia. 2014 Dec;55(12):1986–1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tort AB, Scheffer-Teixeira R, Souza BC, et al. Theta-associated high-frequency oscillations (110-160Hz) in the hippocampus and neocortex. Prog Neurobiol. 2013 Jan;100:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axmacher N, Elger CE, Fell J. Ripples in the medial temporal lobe are relevant for human memory consolidation. Brain. 2008;131(7):1806–1817.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frauscher B, von Ellenrieder N, Zelmann R, et al. High-frequency oscillations in the normal human brain. Ann Neurol. 2018;84(3):374–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ole Jensen LL. Colgin, Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11(7):267–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viktor J, Viktor M. Cross-frequency coupling in real and virtual brain networks. Front Comput Neurosci. 2013;7:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux F, Uhlhaas PJ. Working memory and neural oscillations: α-γ versus θ-γ codes for distinct WM information? Trends Cogn Sci. 2014;18(1):16–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munia TTK, Aviyente S. Time-frequency based phase-amplitude coupling measure for neuronal oscillations. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):12441.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yousef S, Anderson William S. Cross-frequency coupling based neuromodulation for treating neurological disorders. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia M, Alegre M, Vicente R, et al. Cross-frequency coupling. Basic principles and measurements. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(3):3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagur S, Benchenane K. The theta rhythm mixes and matches gamma oscillations cycle by cycle. Neuron. 2018;100(4):768–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grooms JK, Thompson GJ, Pan WJ, et al. Infraslow electroencephalographic and dynamic resting state network activity. Brain Connect. 2017;7(5):265–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos P, Shah AS, Knuth KH, et al. An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;94(3):1904–1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebenhühner F, Wang SH, Arnulfo G, et al. Genuine cross-frequency coupling networks in human resting-state electrophysiological recordings. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(5):5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aru J, Aru J, Priesemann V, et al. Untangling cross-frequency coupling in neuroscience. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015;31:51–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes C, Herrera A, Gaunt R, et al. Bidirectional brain-computer interfaces. Handb Clin Neurol. 2020;168:163–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benvenuto A, Raspopovic S, Hoffmann KP, et al. Intrafascicular thin-film multichannel electrodes for sensory feedback: evidences on a human amputee. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:1800–1803.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Miller LE. Brain–machine interfaces: computational demands and clinical needs meet basic neuroscience. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26(6):331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosking WH, Beauchamp MS, Yoshor D. Electrical stimulation of visual cortex: relevance for the development of visual cortical prosthetics. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2017 Sep 15;3(1):141–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chuang AT, Margo CE, Greenberg PB. Retinal implants: a systematic review. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2014;98(7):852–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills JO, Jalil A, Stanga PE. Electronic retinal implants and artificial vision: journey and present. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(10):1383–1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredi G, Colombo E, Barsotti J, et al. Photochemistry of organic retinal prostheses. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2019;70(1):99–121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chenais NAL, Airaghi Leccardi MJI, Ghezzi D. Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis restores high-resolution responses to single-pixel stimulation in blind retinas. Commun Mater. 2021;2(1):28.
   Google Scholar
• Klaes C, Shi Y, Kellis S, et al. A cognitive neuroprosthetic that uses cortical stimulation for somatosensory feedback. J Neural Eng. 2014 Oct;11(5):056024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell DJ, Cronin JA, Wu J, et al. Direct stimulation of somatosensory cortex results in slower reaction times compared to peripheral touch in humans. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3292.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mazurek KA, Schieber MH. Injecting Information into the Mammalian Cortex: progress, challenges, and promise. Neuroscientist. 2021 Apr;27(2):130–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesher SN, Collinger JL, Foldes ST, et al. Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex. Sci Transl Med. 2016 Oct 19;8(361):361ra141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng H, Wang Y, Wu C, et al. Closed-loop hybrid gaze brain-machine interface based robotic arm control with augmented reality feedback. Front Neurorobot. 2017;11:60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinger JL, Wodlinger B, Downey JE, et al. High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. Lancet. 2013;381(9866):557–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick KM, Weiss JM, Clemente F, et al. Intracortical microstimulation feedback improves grasp force accuracy in a human using a brain-computer interface. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020;2020:3355–3358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flesher SN, Downey JE, Weiss JM, et al. A brain-computer interface that evokes tactile sensations improves robotic arm control. Science. 2021 May 21;372(6544):831–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell David J, Ojemann Jeffrey G, Rao Rajesh PN. Direct electrical stimulation in electrocorticographic brain–computer interfaces: enabling technologies for input to cortex. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazurek KA, Schieber MH. injecting information into the mammalian cortex: progress, challenges, and promise. Neuroscientist. 2021 Apr;27(2):129–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulay CB, Sarnacki WA, Wolpaw JR, et al. Trained modulation of sensorimotor rhythms can affect reaction time. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122(9):1820–1826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millán José del R, Rüdiger R, Gernot M-P, et al. combining brain–computer interfaces and assistive technologies: state-of-the-art and challenges. Front Neurosci. 2010;4; 9–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggenmos DJ, Azin M, Barbay S, et al. Restoration of function after brain damage using a neural prosthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(52):21177–21182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George R, Chiappalone M, Giugliano M, et al. Plasticity and adaptation in neuromorphic biohybrid systems. iScience. 2020;23(10):101589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy PR, Bakay RAE, Moore MM, et al. Direct control of a computer from the human central nervous system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2000;8(2):198–202.
   Google Scholar
• Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Miller LE. Brain–machine interfaces: computational demands and clinical needs meet basic neuroscience. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26(6):330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinger JL, Wodlinger B, Downey JE, et al. High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. Lancet. 2013;381(9866):562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchesotti S, Martuzzi R, Schurger A, et al. Cortical and subcortical mechanisms of brain-machine interfaces. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Jun;38(6):2971–2989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropotov JD. Chapter 4.5 “Transcranial magnetic stimulation” in functional neuromarkers for psychiatry. Academic Press; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2016. p. 59.
   Google Scholar
• Pels EGM, Aarnoutse EJ, Leinders S, et al. Stability of a chronic implanted brain-computer interface in late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;130(10):1798–1803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szarowski DH, Andersen MD, Retterer S, et al. Brain responses to micro-machined silicon devices. Brain Res. 2003;983(1–2):23–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong G, Viveros RD, Zwang TJ, et al. Tissue-like neural probes for understanding and modulating the brain. Biochemistry. 2018;57(27):3997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzi G, Scrivani A, Fini M, et al. Biomedical coatings to improve the tissue-biomaterial interface. Int J Artif Organs. 2004;27(8):649–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen J, Chaofan G, Guo Z, et al. Flexible and stretchable opto-electric neural interface for low-noise electrocorticogram recordings and neuromodulation in vivo. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112009.
   Google Scholar
• Fekete Z, Pongrácz A. Multifunctional soft implants to monitor and control neural activity in the central and peripheral nervous system: a review. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2017;243:1214–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axpe E, Orive G, Franze K, et al. Towards brain-tissue-like biomaterials. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong G, Viveros RD, Zwang TJ, et al. Tissue-like neural probes for understanding and modulating the brain. Biochemistry. 2018;57(27):3995–4004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong G, Yang X, Zhou T, et al. Mesh electronics: a new paradigm for tissue-like brain probes. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018;50:33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazurek KA, Schieber MH. injecting information into the mammalian cortex: progress, challenges, and promise. Neuroscientist. 2021;27(2):139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Bian GB, Tian Z. Removal of artifacts from EEG signals: a review. Sensors (Basel). 2019 Feb 26;19(5):987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yılmaz G, Ungan P, Sebik O, et al. Interference of tonic muscle activity on the EEG: a single motor unit study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birbaumer N, Elbert T, Canavan A, et al. Slow Potentials of the Cerebral Cortex and Behavior. Physiol Rev. 1990;70(1):10–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creel DJ “VEP recording methods”. in visually evoked potentials. Webvision. Moran Eye Center, Nov 29, 2020. http://webvision.med.utah.edu/book/electrophysiology/visually-evoked-potentials; accessed 20 May 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Hinrichs H, Scholz M, Baum AK, et al. Comparison between a wireless dry electrode EEG system with a conventional wired wet electrode EEG system for clinical applications. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Kumar KS, He H, et al. Fully organic compliant dry electrodes self-adhesive to skin for long-term motion-robust epidermal biopotential monitoring. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenoy AJ, Simpson RK Jr. Risks of common complications in deep brain stimulation surgery: management and avoidance. J Neurosurg. 2014 Jan;120(1):132–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenoy AJ, Simpson RK Jr. Management of device-related wound complications in deep brain stimulation surgery. J Neurosurg. 2012 Jun;116(6):1324–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimiter P, Jean D. Mechanical and biological interactions of implants with the brain and their impact on implant design. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polikov VS, Tresco PA, Reichert WM. Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. J Neurosci Methods. 2005;148(1):1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowla M Rakibul, Huggins J E, Thompson David E. Enhancing P300-BCI performance thorugh latency estimation. Brain-Computer Interfaces. 2017;4(3):137–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugo ZR, Pokorny C, Pellas F, et al. Mental imagery for brain-computer interface control and communication in non-responsive individuals. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;63(1):21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankertz B, Sannelli C, Sebastian Halder EM, et al. Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance. NeuroImage. 2010;51(4):1303–1309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emami Z, Chau T. The effects of visual distractors on cognitive load in a motor imagery brain-computer interface. Behav Brain Res. 2020;378:112240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fekete Z, Németh A, Márton G, et al. Experimental study on the mechanical interaction between silicon neural microprobes and rat dura mater during insertion. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015;26:70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell RG, Balsters JH, Kilcullen SM, et al. A simultaneous ERP/fMRI investigation of the P300 aging effect. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(10):2448–2461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjell AM, Rosquist H, Walhovd KB. Instability in the latency of p3a/p3b brain potentials and cognitive function in aging. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30(12):2065–2079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdikis S, Tonin L, Saeedi S, et al. The Cybathlon BCI race: successful longitudinal mutual learning with two tetraplegic users. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(5):e2003787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zisk AH, Borgheai SB, McLinden J, et al. P300 latency jitter and its correlates in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;132(2):632–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francesca Schettini, Monica Risetti, Pietro Arico, Rita Formisano, Fabio Babiloni, Donatella Mattia, Febo Cincotti. P300 latency Jitter occurrence in patients with disorders of consciousness: toward a better design for Brain Computer Interface applications. 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); Milan, Italy; 2015. p. 6178–6181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319803
   Google Scholar
• Mowla MR, Huggins JE, Natarajan B, et al. P300 latency estimation using least mean squares filter. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:1976–1979.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narayanan RT, Udvary D, Oberlaender M. Cell type-specific structural organization of the six layers in rat barrel cortex. Front Neuroanat. 2017;11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2017.00091
   Google Scholar
• Ioan O, Stephano C, Noga Brian R. What is the evidence for inter-laminar integration in a prefrontal cortical minicolumn? Front Neuroanat. 2017;11. p. 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2017.00116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassanelli S, Mahmud M, Girardi S, et al. On the way to large-scale and high-resolution brain-chip interfacing. Cogni Comput. 2012;4(1):71–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sempreboni D, Luca V. Privacy, security and trust in the internet of neurons; 11 July 2018. arXiv:1807.06077 [cs.CY]
   Google Scholar
• Mahmud M, Vassanelli S. Processing and analysis of multichannel extracellular neuronal signals: state-of-the-art and challenges. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar