References
- Aitchison, C. (2003). Thesis writing circles. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 97–115.
- Aitchison, C. (2009). Writing groups for doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 905–916. doi: 10.1080/03075070902785580
- Aitchison, C., & Guerin, C. (2014). Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory. London: Routledge.
- Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflections on activity theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 197–210.
- Berquist, B. (2017). Foreign PhD students are worth it. Auckland: Newsroom. Retrieved from https://www.newsroom.co.nz/@future-learning/2017/03/29/17147/investment-in-international-phd-students-paying-off
- Bitchener, J. (2018a). A guide to supervising non-native English writers of theses and dissertations: Focusing on the writing process. New York: Routledge.
- Bitchener, J. (2018b). The relationship between reading, thinking and writing the literature review component of a doctoral confirmation proposal. In S. Carter & D. Laurs (Eds.), Developing research writing: A handbook for supervisors and advisors (pp. 9–16). Abingdon: Routledge.
- Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 writing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1176008
- Carter, S. (2011). Doctorate as genre: Supporting thesis writing across campus. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 725–736. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.554388
- Cuthbert, D., Spark, C., & Burke, E. (2009). Disciplining writing: The case for multi-disciplinary writing groups to support writing for publication by higher degree by research candidates in the humanities, arts and social sciences. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(2), 137–149. doi: 10.1080/07294360902725025
- Ferguson, T. (2009). The ‘write’ skills and more: A thesis writing group for doctoral students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 285–297. doi: 10.1080/03098260902734968
- Guerin, C., Xafis, V., Doda, D., Gillam, M. H., Larg, A. J., Luckner, H., … Xu, C. (2013). Diversity in collaborative research communities: A multicultural, multidisciplinary thesis writing group in public health. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(1), 65–81. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2012.684375
- Haas, S. (2014). Pick-n-mix: A typology of writers’ groups. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory (pp. 30–47). London: Routledge.
- Hayton, J. (2015). How to cope with harsh supervisor feedback. Retrieved from https://jameshaytonphd.com/how-to-cope-with-harsh-supervisor-feedback/
- Holmes, B., Birds, K., Sealy, A., Smith, D. B., & Wilson, K. N. (2010). Cohort learning for graduate students at the dissertation stage. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 7(1), 5–11.
- Johnson, E. M. (2013). “Previously I thought writing was writing”: Reflections on doctoral writing spaces. In S. Frielick, N. Buissink-Smith, P. Wyse, J. Billot, J. Hallas, & E. Whitehead (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: The place of learning and teaching (pp. 233–242). Auckland: HERDSA.
- Johnson, E. M. (2014a). Toward the building of a cross-disciplinary research and writing culture. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 11(1). Retrieved from http://rouow.edu.au/jutlp/vol11/iss1/4
- Johnson, E. M. (2014b). Doctorates in the dark: Threshold concepts and the improvement of doctoral supervision. Waikato Journal of Education, 19(2), 69–82.
- Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2008). The failure of dissertation advice books: Toward alternative pedagogies for doctoral writing. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 507–514. doi: 10.1080/1356251042000195358
- Kiley, M. (2009). Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 293–304. doi: 10.1080/14703290903069001
- Larcombe, W., McCosker, A., & O’Loughlin, K. (2007). Supporting education PhD and DEd students to become confident academic writers: An evaluation of thesis writers’ circles. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 4(1), 54–63.
- Lee, A. (2018). Setting up frameworks. In S. Carter & D. Laurs (Eds.), Developing research writing: A handbook for supervisors and advisors (pp. 30–39). Abingdon: Routledge.
- Maher, M., Fallucca, A., & Mulhern Halasz, H. (2013). Write on! Through to the Ph.D.: Using writing groups to facilitate doctoral degree progress. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(2), 193–208. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2012.736381
- Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistomological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5
- Murray, R. (2015). Writing in the social spaces: A social processes approach to academic writing. London: Routledge.
- Norgrove, A., & Scott, D. (2017). How does New Zealand’s education system compare?: OECD’s education at a glance 2017. Wellington: Ministry of Education, Evidence, Data and Knowledge. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/182535/Education-at-a-Glance-2017-New-Zealand-Summary-Report.pdf
- OECD. (2017). Education at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD. doi: 10.1787/eag-2017-en
- Paré, A. (2011). Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 59–74). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Taylor, S., Kiley, M., & Humphrey, R. (2017). A handbook for doctoral supervisors (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.