2,128
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Ten theses on the the shift from (static) text to (moving) image

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , ORCID Icon & show all

References

  • Backman, J. (2015). Towards a genealogy of the metaphysics of sight; seeing, hearing and thinking in Heraclitus. In A. Cimino & P. Kontos (Eds.), Phenomenology and the metaphysics of sight (pp. 11–36). Leiden: Brill.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays. (Edited M. Holquist & V. Liapunov; Trans. V. Lipapunov). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Burri, R. V. (2012). Visual rationalities: Towards a sociology of images. Current Sociology, 60(1), 45–60. doi: 10.1177/0011392111426647
  • Debord, G. (1970). The Society of the spectacle. Detroit: Black and Red.
  • Innes, H. (1951). The bias of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Jay, M. (1993). Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. Berkely, CA: University of California Press
  • Johnson, W. (1983). The Austrian mind: An intellectual and social history, 1848–1938. Berkely, CA: University of California Press.
  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media (1st ed.). New York: McGraw Hill; reissued by MIT Press, 1994, with introduction by Lewis H. Lapham; reissued by Gingko Press, 2003.
  • Naugle, D. (2002). Worldview: The history of a concept. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
  • Patterson, S. W. (2010). A picture held us captive: The later Wittgenstein on visual argumentation. Cogency, 2(2), 105–134. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/770551/_A_picture_held_us_Captive_The_later_Wittgenstein_on_visual_argumentation
  • Peters, M. (2010). Pedagogies of the image: Economies of the gaze. Analysis and Metaphysics, 9, 42–61.
  • Peters, M. (2017). Education in a post truth world. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00131857.2016.1264114
  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Schorske, C. (1980). Fin-De-Siecle Vienna. New York: Random House, Penguin.
  • Tarrant, D. (1960). Greek metaphors of light. Classical Quarterly, 10(3–4), 181–187. doi: 10.1017/S0009838800003943
  • Toulmin, S., & Janik, A. (1973). Wittgenstein’s Vienna. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

References

  • Broude, N., & Garard, M. D. (Eds.). (1982). Feminism and art history: Questioning the litany. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Evans, J., & Hall, S. (1999). Visual culture: The reader. London: Sage Publications in association with The Open University.
  • Fine, E. H. (1978). Women and Art: A history of women painters and sculptors from the Renaissance to the 20th century. New Jersey: Allanheld and Schram.
  • Grierson, E. M. (1990). The art of Louise Henderson, Master of Arts thesis, University of Auckland.
  • Harris, A. S., & Nochlin, L. (1981). Women artists 1550–1950. New York: Alfred Knopf and Los Angeles County Museum of Art.
  • Lippard, L. (1976). From the center: Feminist essays on women’s art. Toronto: Clarke, Irwin & Co. Ltd.
  • Lippard, L. (1983). Overlay, contemporary art and the art of prehistory. New York: Pantheon.
  • McCahon, C. (1954, February 1). Louise Henderson: Colin McCahon discusses the painter’s work which was recently exhibited in Auckland. Home and Building.
  • Mitchell, W. J. T. (1994). Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Nead, L. (1992). The female nude: Art, obscenity and sexuality. London: Routledge.
  • Parker, R., & Pollock, G. (1981). Old mistresses: Women, art and ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Perry, G. (1979). Paula Modersohn-Becker, her life and work. London: The Women’s Press.
  • Petersen, K., & Wilson, J. J. (1979). Women artists: Recognition and reappraisal from the early middle ages to the twentieth century. London: The Women’s Press.
  • Pollock, G. (1988). Vision and difference, femininity, feminism and the histories of art. London: Routledge.
  • Pollock, G. (1996). Generations and geographies in the visual arts: Feminist readings. London: Routledge.
  • Pollock, G. (1999). Differencing the Canon: Feminist desire and the writing of art’s histories. London: Routledge.

References

References

References

  • Bayne, S., & Jandrić, P. (2017). From anthropocentric humanism to critical posthumanism in digital education. Knowledge Cultures, 5(2), 197–216. doi: 10.22381/KC52201712
  • Berger, A. A. (2013). Semiological analysis. In O. Boyd-Barrett & P. Braham (Eds.), Media, knowledge and power: A reader (pp. 132–155). New York: Routledge.
  • Berger, J., Blomberg, S., Fox, C., Dibb, M., & Hollis, R. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation & Penguin.
  • Bruni, L. E. (2015). Sustainability, cognitive technologies and the digital semiosphere. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(1), 103–117. doi: 10.1177/1367877914528121
  • Gunaratman, Y., & Bell, V. (2017, January). How John Berger changed our ways of seeing art: He taught us that photographs always need language, and require a narrative, to make sense. The Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/john-berger-ways-of-seeing-a7518001.html
  • Lessig, L. (2001). Code: And other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
  • Lotman, J. (1984/2005). On the semiosphere. Trans. W. Clark. Sign Systems Studies, 33(1), 205–229.
  • Moriarty, S. (2005). Visual semiotics theory. In K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis, & K. Kenney (Eds.), Handbook of visual communication research: Theory, methods, and media (pp. 227–242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • O’Neill, S. (2008). Interactive media: The semiotics of embodied interaction. London: Springer Science + Business Media.
  • Peters, M. A., & Jandrić, P. (2017). The digital university: A dialogue and manifesto. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Saddhu, S. (2012, September 7). Ways of Seeing opened our eyes to visual culture. Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2012/sep/07/ways-seeing-berger-tv-programme-british

References

References

  • Epstein, M. (2012). The transformative humanities: A manifesto. Chicago: Bloomsbury academic.
  • Higgins, K. (2010). Nietzche’s Zarasthustra (Revised ed.). Plymouth: Lexington Books.
  • Malevich, K. (2014). The world as objectlessness. Trans. Hatje Cantz Verlag, Ostfildern, Kuntsmuseum Basel, Germany, Ganske Publishing Company.

References