Is peer review in academic publishing still working?Footnote^*

* Reviewers John Ozolins, [email protected], Australian Catholic University, Melbourne Peter Roberts [email protected] University of Canterbury, Christchurch

References

• Adkins, L., & Dever, M. (2015). Academic labour-on-the-move. Australian Feminist Studies, 84(30), 105–108. doi: 10.1080/08164649.2015.1046303
   Google Scholar
• Adkins, L., & Jokinen, E. (2008). Gender, living and labour in the fourth shift. Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, (16)3, 138–149. doi: 10.1080/08038740802300947
   Google Scholar
• Barok, D., et al. Custodians.online (2015). In solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-Hub. Retrieved from http://custodians.online/
   Google Scholar
• Biagioli, M. (2002). From book censorship to academic peer review. Emergences: Journal for the Study of Media & Composite Cultures, 12(1), 11–45. doi: 10.1080/1045722022000003435
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, F. H. (2014). The history and practice of peer review. Groundwater, 52(1), 1. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cixous, H. (1981). The laugh of the medusa. In E. Marks & I. de Courtivron (Eds.), New French feminisms (pp. 875–893). New York, NY: Schocken.
   Google Scholar
• Comer, D. R., & Schwartz, M. (2014). The problem of humiliation in peer review. Ethics & Education, 9(2), 141–156. doi: 10.1080/17449642.2014.913341
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, K. (2011). Planned obsolescence: Publishing, technology, and the future of the academy. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings (1972–1977). Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2003). Psychiatric Power: Lectures at the Collège de France 1973-1974 (G. Burchell, Ed.). New York, NY: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, H. H., Friedman, L. W., & Leverton, C. (2016). Increase diversity to boost creativity and enhance problem solving. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 4, 7–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstein, M., & Friedman, H. H. (2016). Rethinking higher education: Focusing on skills and competencies. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 4, 104–121. doi: 10.22381/PIHRM4220165
   Google Scholar
• Giles, J. (2005). Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/438900a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grierson, E. M. (2008). Heeding heidegger's way: Questions of the work of art. In V. Karalis (Ed.), Heidegger and the aesthetics of living (pp. 45–64). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grierson, E. M. (2015). Activating aesthetics: Working with heidegger and bourdieu for engaged pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(6), 546–562. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2015.1026303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest _witness@sSecond_millennium.FemaleMan(c)_meets_ OncoMouse TM: Feminism and technoscience. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1999a). The origin of the work of Art. In D. Krell (Ed.), Basic writings: Martin heidegger (pp. 139–212). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1999b). The question concerning technology. In D. Krell (Ed.), Basic writings: Martin heidegger (pp. 343–363). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, L., & Stewart, G. (Eds.). (2017). Lifting the publishing curtain: The editor interview project of the EPAT Editorial Development Group (EDG). Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(2), 105–111. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2015.1069037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandrić, P. (2010). Wikipedia and education: Anarchist perspectives and virtual practices. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 8(2), 48–73.
   Google Scholar
• Jandrić, P. (2017). Learning in the age of the digital media. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Koop, T., & Pöschl, U. (2006). Systems: An open, two-stage peer-review journal. Nature. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04988.html?foxtrotcallback=true
   Google Scholar
• Layard, R. (2016). Why we should spend more on mental health. American Journal of Medical Research, 3, 188–206. doi: 10.22381/AJMR3120167
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, R. E. B. (2016). Integral migration in developing economies: An overview of recent evidence. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 8, 159–191. doi: 10.22381/GHIR8220168
   Google Scholar
• Machan, T. R. (2016). The morality of gregarious egoism. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 8, 7–29. doi: 10.22381/CRLSJ8220161
   Google Scholar
• Mehmani, B. (2016). Is open peer review the way forward? Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers-update/story/innovation-in-publishing/is-open-peer-review-the-way-forward
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K. (2017, May 8). If this is Feminism It’s Been Hijacked by the thought police. The Philosophical Salon. Retrieved from http://thephilosophicalsalon.com/if-this-is-feminism-its-been-hijacked-by-the-thought-police/
   Google Scholar
• Overbaugh, J. (2017). Gender bias: Track revisions and appeals. Nature, 543, 40. doi: 10.1038/543040a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., Besley, T., Jandrić, P., & Bajić, M. (2016). Editorial interview. Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 1(2). Retrieved from http://videoeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40990-016-0006-z
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., & Jandrić, P. (2017). The digital university: A dialogue and manifesto. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., Irwin, R., Locke, K., Devine, N., Heraud, R., … Roberts, P. (2016). Toward a philosophy of academic publishing. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(14), 1401–1425. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2016.1240987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petkas, A. (2017, July 10). Why name a journal after Hypatia? Eidolon. Retrieved from https://eidolon.pub/why-name-a-journal-after-hypatia-a90b51d56f7c
   Google Scholar
• Pontille, D., & Torny, D. (2014). The blind shall see! The question of anonymity in journal peer review. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, no. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, G. H. (2016). Gender, work, and wages: Patterns of female participation in the labor market. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 4, 128–134. doi: 10.22381/JSME4120165
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, G. H. (2017). The economics of e-learning production. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 12, 68–74. doi: 10.22381/EMFM12120174
   Google Scholar
• Terry, A. (2016). Reconceptualizing gender: A historical perspective from structure to process and intersectionality. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 6, 69–82. doi: 10.22381/JRGS6220164
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (1995). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Singal, J. (2017, May 2). This is what a modern-day witch hunt looks like. New York Magazine. Retrieved from http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/05/transracialism-article-controversy.html
   Google Scholar
• Tuvel, R. (2017). In defence of transracialism. Hypatia, 2(32), 263–278. doi: 10.1111/hypa.12327
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, G. (2016). Reviewing and ethics in the online academy (guest editorial). Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(5), 437–442. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2014.950804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotwell, A., et al. (2017). Open letter to Hypatia. Gender Trender. Retrieved from https://gendertrender.wordpress.com/
   Google Scholar
• Weede, E. (2016). Geopolitics, institutions, and economics: On the rise and decline of civilizations. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 8, 177–220. doi: 10.22381/GHIR8120168
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, J. (2017, July 24). Hypatia’s Associate Editors Resign. Daily Nous. Retrieved from http://dailynous.com/2017/07/24/hypatias-associate-editors-resign/
   Google Scholar
• Winnubst, S. (2017, May 8). Why Tuvel’s article so troubled its critics. The Chronicle Review of The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/Why-Tuvel-s-Article-So/240029/
   Google Scholar
• Winston, J. (2015). Open peer review could result in better quality of peer review. Retrieved from https://www.biomedcentral.com/about/press-centre/science-press-releases/30-09-2015
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. (1999). Scholarly publishing, peer review and the internet. First Monday: The Peer-Reviewed Journal on the Internet, 4(4). Retrieved from http://ojphi.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/661/576 doi: 10.5210/fm.v4i4.661
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. (2006). Performativity, measurement and research: A critique of performance-based research funding in New Zealand. In J. Ozga, T. Popkewitz, & T. Seddon (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2006: Education research and policy (pp. 185–199). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. (2013). Academic dystopia: Knowledge, performativity and tertiary education. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 35(1), 27–43. doi: 10.1080/10714413.2013.753757
   Google Scholar