Imagery and Science in Singing Pedagogy: Redefining Imagination – A First Step to Resolving the Debate

References

• Alexander, Robin. 2004. Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk. York: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, Catherine, and Catherine Bulley. 2011. “A Model of Active Student Participation in Curriculum Design: Exploring Desirability and Possibility.” In Improving Student Learning - 18: Global Theories and Local Practices: Institutional, Disciplinary and Cultural Variations, 176-188, edited by C. Rust. Oxford, UK: Oxford Brookes University.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, Catherine, Alison Cook-Sather, Peter Felten, Luke Millard, and Niamh Moore-Cherry. 2016. “Addressing Potential Challenges in Co-Creating Learning and Teaching: Overcoming Resistance, Navigating Institutional Norms and Ensuring Inclusivity in Student–Staff Partnerships.” Higher Education 71 (2): 195–208. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, Kenneth. 2007. “A Case for Science in the Voice Studio.” Journal of Singing 63 (3): 265–270.
   Google Scholar
• Bunch-Dayme, Meribeth. 2009. Dynamics of the Singing Voice. 4th ed. Vienna: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, Jean. 1998. “Singing Teachers and Voice Science: An Evaluation of Voice Teaching in Australian Tertiary Institutions.” Research Studies in Music Education 10 (1): 25–41. doi:10.1177/1321103X9801000103.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, Jean. 2014. Singing and Science: Body, Brain and Voice. Oxford: Compton Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Janice. 2017. Singing and Teaching Singing: A Holistic Approach to Classical Voice. 3rd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland, T. 1989. “Vocal Pedagogy in the 21st Century: Mental Imagery and the Teaching of Voice.” Journal of Singing 45 (3): 41–43.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, Gregory, and Ian Ravenscroft. 2002. Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, Antonio, Daniel Tranel, and Hanna Damasio. 1991. “Somatic Markers and the Guidance of Behaviour: Theory and Preliminary Testing.” In Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction, edited by H. Levin, H. Eisenberg, and A. Benton, 217–229. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Lillis, Antonio. 2020. “Imagery and Science in Singing Pedagogy: A Debate Introduction and Literature Review.” Voice and Speech Review 15 (1): 89–95. doi:10.1080/23268263.2020.1753342.
   Google Scholar
• Doscher, Barbara. 1999. The Functional Unity of the Singing Voice. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, Howard. 1993. Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons in Theory and Practice. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, Howard. 2006. Changing Minds: The Art and Science of Changing Our Own and Other People’s Minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Alvin. 2006. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology and Neuroscience of Mind Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helding, Lynn. 2007. “Voice Science and Vocal Art. Part One: In Search of Common Ground.” Journal of Singing 64 (2): 141–150.
   Google Scholar
• Helding, Lynn. 2008. “Voice Science and Vocal Art. Part Two: Motor Learning Theory.” Journal of Singing 64 (4): 417–428.
   Google Scholar
• Helding, Lynn. 2009. “The Missing Brain.” Journal of Singing 66 (1): 79–84.
   Google Scholar
• Helmsley, Thomas. 1998. Singing and Imagination: A Human Approach to A Great Musical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, Larry, and Thomas Alexander, eds. 1998. The Essential Dewey Volume 1: Pragmatism, Education, Democracy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, Paul, and David Collins. 2001. “‘The PETTLEP Approach to Motor Imagery: A Functional Equivalence Model for Sport Psychologists’.” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 13 (1): 60–83. doi:10.1080/10413200109339004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, Robert. 1964. “Imagery: The Return of the Ostracized.” American Psychologist 19 (4): 254–264. doi:10.1037/h0046316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard -Jones, Paul. 2018. Evolution of the Learning Brain: Or How You Got to Be so Smart. Oxford: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesgen, Paul. 2005. “Well, Vocal Pedagogy Is All Subjective Anyway, Isn’t It?” Journal of Voice 62 (1): 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Leanderson, Rolf, Johan Sundberg, and Curt von Euler. 1987. “Role of Diaphragmatic Activity during Singing: A Study of Transdiaphragmatic Pressures.” Journal of Applied Physiology 62 (1): 259–270. doi:10.1152/jappl.1987.62.1.259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linklater, Kristin. 2006. Freeing the Natural Voice. 2nd ed. London: Nick Hern Books.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, Scott. 2012. “Some Thoughts on Singing and Science.” Journal of Singing 68 (5): 527–530.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, Deidre. 2010a. “Dispelling Vocal Myths: Part 1: Sing From Your Diaphragm!” Journal of Singing 66 (5): 547–551.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, Deidre. 2010b. “Dispelling Vocal Myths: Part 2: Sing It Off The Chords.” Journal of Singing 67 (4): 417–421.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, Deirdre. 2012a. “Dispelling Vocal Myths: Part 3: Sing OVER Your Cold!” Journal of Singing 68 (4): 419–425.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, Deirdre. 2012b. “Dispelling Vocal Myths: Part 4: Talk Higher!” Journal of Singing 69 (2): 419–425.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, Deirdre. 2015. “Dispelling Vocal Myths: Part 5: Sniff to Raise the Palate!” Journal of Singing 71 (3): 319–324.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Richard. 2001. “The Syntax of Voice Technique.” Journal of Singing 58 (1): 49–50.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Richard. 2004. Solutions for Singers: Tools for Every Performer and Teacher. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Gregory. 2012. “Revisiting Truth or Triviality: The External Validity of Research in the Psychological Laboratory.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (2): 109–117. doi:10.1177/1745691611432343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, Garyth. 1999. Voice Tradition and Technology: A State-Of-The-Art Studio. (Reprint). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, M. C. 1930. “Imagination and Teaching.” The Journal of Higher Education 1 (7): 387–390. doi:10.2307/1974172.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, Allan. 1971. “Imagery and Verbal Processes.” Science 176 (4035): 628–630.
   Google Scholar
• Paternaude-Yarnell, Joan. 2003. “The Role of Imagination in Teaching Voice.” Journal of Singing 59 (5): 425–430.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Cornelius. 1983. A Dictionary of Vocal Terminology: An Analysis. New York: Joseph Patelson Music House.
   Google Scholar
• Sataloff, Robert. 1995. “Rational Thought: The Impact of Voice Science on Voice Care.” Journal of Voice 9 (3): 215–234. doi:10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80230-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven, Michael. 1972. “The Exact Role of Value Judgments in Science. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.” Philosophy of Science Association Journal 1972: 219–247. www.jstor.org/stable/3698971.
   Google Scholar
• Seiler, Emma. 1879. The Voice in Singing. Philadelphia: PA Lippencott.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, Anne. 2003. “The Mirror of Imagination: The Influence of Timaeus 70e Ff.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 46 (78): 203–212. doi:10.1111/j.2041-5370.2003.tb02143.x.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, James. 2003. Bel Canto: A History of Vocal Pedagogy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steane, Andrew. 2018. Science and Humanity: A Humane Philosophy of Science and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198824589.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Xu, and Andrew May. 2013. “A Comparison of Field-Based and Lab-Based Experiments to Evaluate User Experience of Personalised Mobile Devices.” Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2013: Article ID 619767. doi:10.1155/2013/619767.
   Google Scholar
• Swank, Helen. 1984. “Some Verbal Directives regarding Support Concepts and Their Effects upon Resultant Sung Tone.” Journal of Singing 40 (3): 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Verdolini, Katherine. 1994. “The Role of Elaborative and Perceptual Integrative Processes in Perceptual-Motor Performance.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 (3): 739–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdolini, Katherine. 2000. “Principles of Skill Acquisition Applied to Voice Training.” In The Vocal Vision: Views on Voice by 24 Leading Teachers, Coaches and Directors, Chapter 8, edited by Marion Hampton and Barbara Acker. New York: Applause Theatre Book Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, Rachel. 2013. “The Use of Science and Imagery in the Voice Studio—A Survey of Voice Teachers in the United States and Canada.” Journal of Singing 69 (4): 413–317.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Peter, and Hixon Thomas. 1985. “Respiratory Kinematics in Classical (Opera) Singing.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28 (1): 104–122. doi:10.1044/jshr.2801.104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wells, Gordan, and Gen Chang-Wells. 1992. Constructing Knowledge Together. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Jenevora. 2019. Teaching Singing to Children and Young Adults. Oxford: Compton Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wiltsher, Nick. 2019. “Imagination: A Lens Not A Mirror.” Philosophers Imprint 19 (30): 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittrock, Merlin. 1977. The Human Brain. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar