Insights, Considerations, and Suggestions for the Practitioner-Researcher in Voice Studies

References

• Abson, D.J., J. Fischer, J. Leventon, J. Newig, T. Schomerus, U. Vilsmaier, H. von Wehrden, et al. 2017. “Leverage Points for Sustainability Transformation.” Ambio 46 (1): 30–39. doi:10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, Elizabeth G., and Dana Lynn Driscoll. 2014. “The three-fold Benefit of Reflective Writing: Improving Program Assessment, Student Learning, and Faculty Professional Development.” Assessing Writing 21: 37–55. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmark, Peter, and Katarzyna Machaczek. 2018. “Realism and Pragmatism in a Mixed Methods Study.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 74 (6): 1301–1309. Accessed 9 March 2022. https://shura.shu.ac.uk/18205/1/Allmark-RealismAndPragmatism%28AM%29.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. D. 1994. Methods of Social Research. 4th ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, Patricia Hill, and Stephen Tilley. 2002. “Storytelling and the Interpretation of Meaning in Qualitative Research.” Methodological Issues in Nursing Research 574–583.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Janet. 2017. Psychosocial Perspectives on the Management of Voice Disorders: Implications for Clients; Options and Strategies for Clinicians. Oxford: Compton.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Sarah Elsie, and Rosalind Edwards. 2012. “How Many Qualitative Interviews Is Enough?” Southampton: National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, J. 2005. A Guide for first-time Researchers in Education, Health and Social Science. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, Bruce L. 1989. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. 4th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Brewis, Joanna. 2014. “The Ethics of Researching Friends: On Convenience Sampling in Qualitative Management and Organization Studies.” British Journal of Management 25 (4): 849–862. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. 1995. Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Nicole. 2015. Epistemology. Accessed 14 June 2022. https://www.nicole-brown.co.uk/epistemology/
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P., P. Gill, K. Stewart, E. Treasure, and B. Chadwick. 2008. “Analysing and Presenting Qualitative Data.” British Dental Journal 204 (8): 429–432. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan, Jean. 2014. Singing and Science: Body, Brain and Voice. Braunton: Compton.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. 2002. “Implementing appraisal: a case study of the implementation of an appraisal system.” Unpublished Ed.D. thesis, (Milton Keynes, The Open University).
   Google Scholar
• Cavarereo, Adriana. 2005. For More than One Voice: Toward a Philosophy of Vocal Expression. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chilisa, Bagele, and Barbara Kawulich. 2015. “Selecting a Research Approach: Paradigm, Methodology and Methods.” October 8. Accessed 4 March 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257944787_Selecting_a_research_approach_Paradigm_methodology_and_methods
   Google Scholar
• Christie, Chelsea D., Taryn B. Bemister, and Keith S. Dobson. 2015. “Record-informing and note-taking: A Continuation of the Debate about Their Impact on Client Perceptions.” Canadian Psychology 56 (1): 118–122. doi:10.1037/a0037860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancy, Marie. 2013. “Is Reflexivity the Key to Minimising Problems of Interpretation in Phenomenological Research? .” Nurse Researcher 20 (6): 12–16. doi:10.7748/nr2013.07.20.6.12.e1209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke, L.K., M.S. Osborne, and J.A. Baranoff. 2020. “Examining a Group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention for Music Performance Anxiety in Student Vocalists.” Frontiers in Psychology 11 (1127). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coombs, S, and I Smith. 2003. “The Hawthorne Effect: Is It a Help or a Hindrance in Social Science?” Change: Transformations in Education 6 (1): 97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Costley, Carol. 2006. Practitioner-led Enquiry as Development of Professional Practice. Middlesex: Middlesex University.
   Google Scholar
• Costley, C., G. Elliott, and P. Gibbs. 2010. Doing Work-Based Research: Approaches to Enquiry for Insider-Researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cragoe, Nicholas G. 2019. “Oversight: Community Vulnerabilities in the Blind Spot of Research Ethics.” Research Ethics 15 (2): 1–15. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1747016117739936
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2nd. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dibley, L. 2010. “Analysing Narrative Data Using McCormack’s Lenses.” Nurse Researcher 18 (3): 13–19. doi:10.7748/nr2011.04.18.3.13.c8458.
   Google Scholar
• Durie, Bruce. 2005. New Scientist. January 26. Accessed 17 April 2019. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18524841-600-senses-special-doors-of-perception/
   Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M., R. Thorpe, and P. Jackson. 2008. Creating Qualitative Data. Management Research. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., S. Lewandowsky, B. Swire, and D. Chang. 2011. “Correcting False Information in Memory: Manipulating the Strength of Misinformation Encoding and Its Retraction.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18 (3): 570–578. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0065-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” The Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550. doi:10.2307/258557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, Dave. 2022. “Pragmatism, Critical Realism and the Study of Value.” Journal of Critical Realism 21 (3): 261–287. doi:10.1080/14767430.2022.2049088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, Robert Wall. 2015. “Convenience Sampling, Random Sampling, and Snowball Sampling: How Does Sampling Affect the Validity of Research?” Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 109 (2): 164–168. doi:10.1177/0145482X1510900215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etikan, Ilker. 2016. “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling.” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 5 (1): 1–4. doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
   Google Scholar
• Etikan, I, R Alkassim, and S Abubakar. 2015. “Comparision of Snowball Sampling and Sequential Sampling Technique.” December 9 Accessed 9 June 2022 doi:10.15406/bbij.2015.03.00055.
   Google Scholar
• Feilzer, Martina Yvonne. 2010. “Doing Mixed Methods Research Pragmatically: Implications for the Rediscovery of Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4 (1): 6–16. doi:10.1177/1558689809349691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymier, Ann Bainbridge, and Marian L. Houser. 2000. “The Teacher‐student Relationship as an Interpersonal Relationship.” Communication Education 49 (3): 207–219. doi:10.1080/03634520009379209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaye, Tony. 2011. Teaching and Learning through Reflective Practice: A Practical Guide for Positive Action. 2nd. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, G. 2004. Combining Methods in Educational and Social Research. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J. 1993. “Reflective Practice: A Critique of the Work of Argyris and Schön.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, no. 19: 1183–1187. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18081183.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guyon, Hervé, Jean-Luc Kop, Jacques Juhel, and Bruno Falissard. 2018. “Measurement, Ontology, and Epistemology: Psychology Needs pragmatism-realism.” Theory & Psychology 28 (2): 149–171. doi:10.1177/0959354318761606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, Nicola, and Alan Watson. 2020. A Singer’s Guide to the Larynx. Oxford: Compton.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, Gary T. 1990. Practical Sampling. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, Christian T. 2016. “Jvoice.org A Review of Singing Voice Subsystem Interactions – Toward an Extended Physiological Model of “Support”. ”July 22 Accessed 18 October 2018 doi:10.1016/j.voice.2016.07.019.
   Google Scholar
• Hewson, Claire, and Tom Buchanan. 2013. Ethics Guidelines for Internet-mediated Research. London: British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hickling, Linda P., Edward J. Hickling, Gustave F. P. Sison Jr., and Sandra Radetsky. 1984. “The Effect of Note-Taking on a Simulated Clinical Interview.” The Journal of Psychology 116 (2): 235–240. doi:10.1080/00223980.1984.9923641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, Brian A. 2014. “A Simple Introduction to the Practice of Ethnography and Guide to Ethnographic Fieldnotes.” June NA. Accessed 13 April 2019. http://works.bepress.com/brian_hoey/12/
   Google Scholar
• Howell, Rachel A. 2021. “Engaging Students in Education for Sustainable Development: The Benefits of Active Learning, Reflective Practices and Flipped Classroom Pedagogies.” Journal of Cleaner Production November 20 325: 129318. Accessed 30 May 2022 doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, Scott. n.d. 7 Steps to Discover Your Personal Core Values. Accessed 3 May 2019. www.scottjeffrey.com/personal-core-values/
   Google Scholar
• Jirwe, M. 2011. “Analysing Qualitative Data.” Nurse Researcher 18 (3): 4–5. doi:10.7748/nr2011.04.18.3.4.c8456.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnston, Colleen M., Marianne Wallis, Florin I. Oprescu, and Marion Gray. 2016. “Methodological Considerations Related to Nurse Researchers Using Their Own Experience of a Phenomenon within Phenomenology.” October 19. Accessed 30 June 2022. https://eprints.usq.edu.au/45105/1/PDF%20-%20Author%27s%20Accepted%20Version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Juncos, David G., and Paiva e Pona Elvire de. 2022. ACT for Musicians: A Guide for Using Acceptance and Commitment Training to Enhance Performance, Overcome Performance Anxiety, and Improve Well-Being. Irvine: CA: Universal Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, S.A. 1995. At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of self-organization and Complexity. New York: NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, E., S Stringfield, and C. Teddlie. 2003. “Mixed Methods Sampling Strategies in Social Science Research.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, edited by A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 273–296. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Laverty, S. 2003. “Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2 (3): 21–35. doi:10.1177/160940690300200303.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., J. Cook, U. K. H. Ecker, D. Albarracín, M. A. Amazeen, P. Kendeou, D. Lombardi, et al. 2020. “The Debunking Handbook 2020.” Accessed 14 June 2022. https://skepticalscience.com/docs/DebunkingHandbook2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and G. Guba Egon. 1989. “Ethics: The Failure of Positivist Science.” The Review of Higher Education 12 (3): 221–240. doi:10.1353/rhe.1989.0017. Accessed 3 May 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, Noella, and Sally Knipe. 2006. “Issues in Educational Research, Research Dilemmas: Paradigms, Methods and Methodology.” October 14. Accessed 6 March 2019. http://www.iier.org.au/iier16/mackenzie.html
   Google Scholar
• Mahony, S.E., D.G. Juncos, and D. Winter. 2022. “Acceptance and Commitment Coaching for Music Performance Anxiety: Piloting a 6-Week Group Course with Undergraduate Dance and Musical Theatre Students.” Frontiers in Psychology 13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson, D. 2018. “An Exception to the Rule: Journalism and Research Ethics.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research Ethics, edited by Ron Iphofen and Martin Tolich, 429–438. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, Coralie. 2000. “From Interview Transcript to Interpretive Story: Viewing the Transcript through Multiple Lenses & Developing an Interpretive Story.” Field Methods 12 (4): 282–315. doi:10.1177/1525822X0001200402.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, Donella. 1999. Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. Hartland: VT: The Sustainability Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Dr Justine. 2007. “The Challenges of Insider Research in Educational Institutions: Wielding a double-edged Sword and Resolving Delicate Dilemmas.” In Oxford Review of Education, 1–17. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4618693.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. 2005. Research Methods in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. 2009. Transformative Research and Evaluation. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mogil, J.S. 2020. “Qualitative Sex Differences in Pain Processing: Emerging Evidence of a Biased Literature.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 21 (7): 353–365. doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0310-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montague, W. P. 1909. “May a Realist Be a Pragmatist?: I. The Two Doctrines Defined.” The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 6 (17): 460–463. doi:10.2307/2012008.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 2007. “Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1): 48–76. doi:10.1177/2345678906292462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muršič, Rajko. 2012. “The Deceptive Tentacles of the Authenticating Mind: On Authenticity and Some Other Notions that are Good for Absolutely Nothing.” In Debating Authenticity: Concepts of Modernity in Anthropological Perspective, edited by Thomas Fillitz and A. Jamie Saris, 46–60. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, Z. 2004. The Essential Guide to Doing Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, Rebecca E. 2021. “Emotions in Human Research Ethics Guidelines: Beyond Risk, Harm and Pathology.” Qualitative Research August 29 146879412110399. Accessed 28 June 2022doi:10.1177/14687941211039965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., and Nancy Leech. 2007. “Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron?” Quality & Quantity 41 (2): 233–249. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9000-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oram, Daron. 2015. “Research and Practice in Voice Studies: Searching for a Methodology.” Voice and Speech Review 9 (1): 15–27. doi:10.1080/23268263.2015.1059674.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, David, Fred Sherratt, and Simon Smith. 2014. “Handling the Hawthorne Effect: The Challenges Surrounding a Participant Observer.” Review of Social Studies 1 (1): 53–73. doi:10.21586/ross0000004.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S., and S. Patnaik. 2014. “Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Inquiry: A Critical Examination.” Journal of Development and Management Studies 12 (1): 5743–5753.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Charlie, Sam Scott, and Alistair Geddes. 2019. “Snowball Sampling.” September 17 Accessed 9 June 2022 doi:10.4135/9781526421036831710.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, Margo, and Joy Higgs. 2005. “Using Hermeneutics as a Qualitative Research Approach in Professional Practice.” The Qualitative Report 10 (2): 339–357.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, Kenneth H. 1985. “Training The Child Voice.” Music Educators Journal 72 (4): 19–22+57–58. doi:10.2307/3400517.
   Google Scholar
• Phillippi, Julia, and Jana Lauderdale. 2018. “A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research: Context and Conversation.” Qualitative Health Research 28 (3): 381–388. doi:10.1177/1049732317697102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. 1983. Methodology for the Human Sciences: Systems of Inquiry. Albany: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Pukki, Hetta, Jorn Bettin, Avery Grey Outlaw, Joshua Hennessy, Kabie Brook, Martijn Dekker, Mary Doherty, et al. 2022. “Autistic Perspectives on the Future of Clinical Autism Research.” Autism in Adulthood 4 (2): 93–101. doi:10.1089/aut.2022.0017.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roll, C. 2015. “The Evolution of Female Broadway Belt Voice: Implications for Teachers and Singers.” Journal of Voice 30 (5): 639.e1–639.e9. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.07.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosqvist, Hanna Bertilsdotter, Nick Chown, and Anna Stenning. 2020. Neurodiversity Studies: Proposing a New Field of Inquiry. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saidin, Khaliza, and Aizan Yaacob. 2016. “Insider Researchers: Challenges & Opportunities.” October. Accessed 3 May 2019. http://ojs.umsida.ac.id/index.php/icecrs
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, Johnny. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sansom, Rockford. 2017. “The Unspoken Voice and Speech Debate [Or] the Sacred Cow in the Conservatory.” Voice and Speech Review 10 (2–3): 157–168. doi:10.1080/23268263.2016.1318814. Accessed 14 June 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, Nora Cate. 2021. “Interaction before and during the Survey Interview: Insights from Conversation Analysis.” Int. Journal Social Research Methodology 24 (2): 181–202. doi:10.1080/13645579.2020.1824626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeneborn, Dennis. 2008. “Paradigmatic Perspective: Organizations as Communications.” In Alternatives Considered But Not Disclosed, edited by Schoeneborn Dennis, 29–45. Germany: Deutscher Universitätsverlag Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, Thomas A., Lincoln Yvonna S., and Guba Egon G. 2007. Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation 2007 (114): 11–25. (Accessed 14 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.223
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, William. 1604. Measure For Measure.
   Google Scholar
• Shansky, R.M., and A.Z. Murphy. 2021. “Considering Sex as a Biological Variable Will Require a Global Shift in Science Culture.” Nature Neuroscience 24 (4): 457–464. doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00806-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, TA, D.G. Juncos, and D. Winter. 2020. “Piloting a New Model for Treating Music Performance Anxiety: Training a Singing Teacher to Use Acceptance and Commitment Coaching with a Student.” Frontiers in Psychology 11 (882). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00882.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffield, University of. 2020. Research Themes: Epistemology. Accessed 14 June 2022. https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/philosophy/research/themes/epistemology
   Google Scholar
• Shorten, Allison, and Joanna Smith. 2017. “Mixed Methods Research: Expanding the Evidence Base.” Evidence Based Nursing June 14 20 (3):74–75. Accessed 14 June 2022 doi:10.1136/eb-2017-102699.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Somekh, B., and C. Lewin. 2005. Research Methods in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spilt, J.L., H.M.Y. Koomen, and J.T. Thijs. 2011. “Teacher Wellbeing: The Importance of Teacher–Student Relationships.” Educational Psychology Review 23 (4): 457–477. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9170-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, Elizabeth, Charles Antaki, Mike Bracher, Leanne Chrisostomou, Elle Henderson, Danielle Jones, and Simon Stewart. 2021. “The Softness of Hard Data.” November 12. Accessed 29 June 2022. https://elizabeth-stokoe.medium.com/the-softness-of-hard-data-475743d8a2f2
   Google Scholar
• Sugimoto, Cassidy R., Yong-Yeol Ahn, Elise Smith, Benoit Macaluso, and Vincent Larivière. 2019. “Factors Affecting sex-related Reporting: A cross-disciplinary Bibliometric Analysis of Medical Research.” The Lancet 393 (10171): 550–559. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32995-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C, and F Yu. 2007. “Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (77): 77–100. doi:10.1177/1558689806292430.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Nick. 2021. Neuroqueer Heresies. Fort Worth, TX: Autonomous Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, Z., J. Böhme, and C. Wamsler. 2021. “Towards a Relational Paradigm in Sustainability Research, Practice, and Education.” Ambio 50 (1): 74–84. doi:10.1007/s13280-020-01322-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. C. 2006. “Reconciling Different voices–Developing as an Integrative Scientist Practitioner.” Journal of Psychotherapy Integration 16 (1): 20–35. doi:10.1037/1053-0479.16.1.20.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, Debbie. 2020a. “Understanding Research Methods: From Singing Teacher to Practitioner Researcher.” July. (Accessed 14 June 2022) doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16046.13122
   Google Scholar
• Winter, Deborah. 2020b. “Voicing a Practitioner Research Methodology: Further Framing the Conversation.” November 05 Accessed 14 June 2022 doi:10.1080/23268263.2020.1843270.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Vol. 5. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar