Between meaning and mattering: on affect and porn studies

References

• Abel, Marco. 2007. Violent Affect: Literature, Cinema, and Critique After Representation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Sara. 2008. ‘Imaginary Prohibitions. Some Preliminary Remarks on the Founding Gestures of the “New Materialism.”’European Journal of Women's Studies 15 (1): 23–39. doi:10.1177/1350506807084854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Isobel. 2000. The Radical Aesthetic. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Attwood, Feona. 2002. ‘Reading Porn: The Paradigm Shift in Pornography Research.’ Sexualities 5 (1): 91–105. doi:10.1177/1363460702005001005.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, Lisa, and Couze Venn. 2010. ‘Affect.’ Body & Society 16 (1): 7–28. doi:10.1177/1357034X09354769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvetkovitch, Ann. 2001. ‘Fierce Pussies and Lesbian Avengers: Dyke Activism Meets Celebrity Culture.’ In Feminist Consequences: Theory for the New Century, edited by Elisabeth Bronfen and Misha Kavka, 283–318. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, Richard. 1993. The Matter of Images: Essays on Representations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, Richard. 2002. Only Entertainment. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, A. (1987) 2000. ‘Pornography and Grief.’ In Feminism & Pornography, edited by Drucilla Cornell, 39–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallop, Jane. 1988. Thinking Through the Body. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillis, Ken. 2009. Online a Lot of the Time: Ritual, Fetish, Sign. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kappeler, Susanne. 1986. The Pornography of Representation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kipnis, Laura. (1996) 1999. Bound and Gagged: Pornography and the Politics of Fantasy in America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koivunen, Anu. 2010. ‘The Affective Turn? Reimagining the Subject of Feminist Theory.’ In Working with Affect in Feminist Readings: Disturbing Differences, edited by Marianne Liljeström and Susanna Paasonen, 8–29. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kozel, Susan. 2007. Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Annette. 1994. The Power of the Image: Essays on Representation and Sexuality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liljeström, Marianne, and Susanna Paasonen. 2010. ‘Introduction: Feeling differences – Affect and Feminist Reading.’ In Working with Affect in Feminist Readings: Disturbing Differences, edited by Marianne Liljeström and Susanna Paasonen, 1–7. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, Simon. 2010. ‘Widening the Glory Hole: The Discourse of Online Porn Fandom.’ In porn.com: Making Sense of Online Pornography, edited by Feona Attwood, 171–185. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• MacDougall, David. 2006. The Corporeal Image: Film, Ethnography, and the Senses. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, Brian. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Daniel. 2010. Stuff. Oxford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Nancy. 1991. Getting Personal: Feminist Occasions and Other Autobiographical Acts. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paasonen, Susanna. 2007. ‘Strange Bedfellows: Pornography, Affect and Feminist Reading.’ Feminist Theory 8 (1): 43–57. doi:10.1177/1464700107074195.
   Google Scholar
• Paasonen, Susanna. 2011. Carnal Resonance: Affect and Online Pornography. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paasonen, Susanna. 2013. ‘Grains of Resonance: Affect, Pornography and Visual Sensation.’ Somatechnics 3 (2): 351–368. doi:10.3366/soma.2013.0102.
   Google Scholar
• Paasonen, Susanna, Ken Hillis, and Michael Petit. forthcoming. ‘Networks of Transmission: Intensity, Sensation, Value.’ In Networked Affect, edited by Ken Hillis, Susanna Paasonen, and Michael Petit, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Penley, Constance. 2004. ‘Crackers and Whackers: The White Trashing of Porn.’ In Porn Studies, edited by Linda Williams, 309–331. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, and Adam Frank. 1995. ‘Shame in the Cybernetic Fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins.’ In Shame and Its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader, edited by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Adam Frank, 1–28. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seigworth, Gregory J., and Melissa Gregg. 2010. ‘An Inventory of Shimmers.’ In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth, 1–28. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaviro, Steven. 2010. Post-cinematic Affect. Winchester: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shimizu, Celine P. 2007. The Hypersexuality of Race: Performing Asian/American Women on Screen and Scene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, Beverley, and Helen Wood 2012. Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sobchack, Vivian. 2004. Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley: California University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, Nigel. 2008. Non-representational Theory: Space / Politics / Affect. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, Silvan. 1995. ‘What are Affects?’ In Shame and Its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader, edited by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Adam Frank, 33–74. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Doorn, Niels. 2010, ‘Keeping it Real: User-generated Pornography, Gender Reification, and Visual Pleasure.’ Convergence 16 (4): 411–430. doi:10.1177/1354856510375144.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Linda. 1991. ‘Film Bodies: Gender, Genre, and Excess.’ Film Quarterly 44 (4): 2–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar