Unveiling copyright law double bind through pragmatist feminism: adult content creators as authors

References

• Adams, Abi, Judith Freedman and Jeremias Prassl. 2018. ‘Rethinking Legal Taxonomies for the Gig Economy.’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy 34 (3): 475–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albin, Einat. 2013. ‘The Case of Quashie: Between the Legalisation of Sex Work and the Precariousness of Personal Service Work.’ Industrial Law Journal 42 (2): 180–191.
   Google Scholar
• Aloisi, Antonio. 2015. ‘Commoditized Workers: Case Study Research on Labor Law Issues Arising from a Set of On-Demand/Gig Economy Platforms.’ Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37: 653–690.
   Google Scholar
• Antoniou, Alex. 2013. ‘R v Peacock: Landmark Trial Redefines Obscenity Law.’ Graduate Journal of Social Sciences 10 (1): 85–103.
   Google Scholar
• Aplin, Tanya, and Jennifer Davis. 2022. Intellectual Property Law Text, Cases and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Bajwa, Uttam, et al. 2018. ‘Towards an Understanding of Workers’ Experiences in the Global Gig Economy.’ Global Migration & Health Initiative 14 (124): 2–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnett, Jerry. 2016. Porn Panic! Sex and Censorship in the UK. London: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bartow, Ann. 2012. ‘Copyright Law and Pornography.’ Oregon Law Review 91: 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Mary. 1993. ‘Four Feminist Theoretical Approaches and the Double Bind of Surrogacy.’ Chicago-Kent Law Review 69 (2): 303–312.
   Google Scholar
• Bently, Lionel and Brad Sherman. 2014. Intellectual Property Law. 4th ed. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, Heather. 2016. ‘‘A Scene is Just a Marketing Tool’: Alternative Income Streams in Porn’s Gig Economy.’ Porn Studies 3 (2): 160–174.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, Heather. 2020. ‘Porn Work, Independent Contractor Misclassification, And The Limits of The Law.’ Columbia Human Rights Law Review 52 (3): 1159–1198.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, Heather. 2021. Porn Work. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, Faye. 2020. ‘“Is This a Time of Beautiful Chaos?”: Reflecting on International Feminist Legal Methods.’ Feminist Legal Studies 28 (2): 179–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonadio, Enrico and Nicola Lucchi. 2018. ‘Copyright and Pornography.’ In In Non-Conventional Copyright: Do New and Non Traditional Works Deserve Protection?, edited by Enrico Bonadio and Nicola Lucchi, 418–431. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Brake, Deborah L. 2007. ‘Title IX as Pragmatic Feminism.’ Cleveland State Law Review 55 (4): 513–546.
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein, Carolyn. 2011. Battling Pornography: The American Feminist Anti-Pornography Movement, 1976-1986. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Yvette. 2021. ‘Aligned: Sex Workers’ Lessons for the Gig Economy.’ Michigan Journal of Race & Law 26 (2): 337–370.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Deborah. 2018. Feminism: Ideas in Profile. London: Profile.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Julie E. 2017. ‘Law for the Platform Economy.’ University of California Davis Law Review 51: 133–204.
   Google Scholar
• Cossman, Brenda. 2021. The New Sex Wars: Sexual Harm in the #MeToo Era. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Bridget J. 2007. ‘Toward a Third-Wave Feminist Legal Theory: Young Women, Pornography and the Praxis of Pleasure.’ Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 14 (1): 99–168.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, Katy. 2013. ‘Unmanageable Work, (Un)Liveable Lives: The UK Sex Industry, Labour Rights and the Welfare State.’ Social & Legal Studies 22 (4): 465–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, Katy. 2018. ‘Beyond Liberalism: Marxist Feminism, Migrant Sex Work, and Labour Unfreedom.’ Feminist Legal Studies 26 (1): 65–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stefano, Valerio. 2016. ‘The Rise of the Just-in-Time Workforce: On-Demand Work, Crowdwork, and Labor Protection in the Gig-Economy.’ Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37: 471–504.
   Google Scholar
• DeGenevieve, Barbara. 2014. ‘The Emergence of Non-Standard Bodies and Sexualities.’ Porn Studies 1 (1–2): 193–196.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Gerard. 1998. ‘Judicial Control of Copyright on Public Policy Grounds.’ In Intellectual Property and Information Law, edited by Jan Kabeland, Gerard Mom and Phoebe V. Moore, 139–147. London: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Ronald. 1996. Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Easterbrook-Smith, Gwyn. 2022. ‘OnlyFans as Gig-Economy Work: A Nexus of Precarity and Stigma.’ Porn Studies, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• EBU. 2021. Copyright Guide Practical Information for Broadcasters. https://www.ebu.ch/files/live/sites/ebu/files/Publications/EBU-Legal-Copyright-Guide.pdf. Accessed 27 October 2022, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Freccero, Carla. 2008. ‘Updating the Sex “Wars”: Political Challenges to Liberationism.’ The Communication Review 11 (3): 212–216.
   Google Scholar
• Freedland, Mark R. and Jeremias Adams-Prassl. 2017. Employees, Workers, and the ‘Sharing Economy': Changing Practices and Changing Concepts in the United Kingdom. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No 19/2017.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, Patrick W. 2017. ‘RapeLay and the Return of the sex Wars in Japan.’ Porn Studies 4 (1): 105–126.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, Peter. 2020. ‘Love, Passion and … IP: When a Copyright Work Goes Too far.’ Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 15 (11): 926–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, Philip. 2013. ‘‘Being Santa Claus’: The Pursuit of Recognition in Interactive Service Work.’ Work, Employment and Society 27 (6): 1004–1020.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Lynn. 1993. The Invention of Pornography: Obscenity and the Origins of Modernity, 1500–1800. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, Sheila. 2009. The Industrial Vagina: The Political Economy of the Global Sex Trade. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Paul. 2010. ‘Law, Morality and Disgust: The Regulation of ‘Extreme Pornography’ in England and Wales.’ Social & Legal Studies 19 (2): 147–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karapapa, Stavroula and Luke McDonagh. 2019. Intellectual Property Law. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman-Osborn, Timothy. 1993. ‘Teasing Feminist Sense from Experience.’ Hypatia 8 (2): 124–144.
   Google Scholar
• Laddie, Hugh, Peter Prescott and Mary Vitoria. 2018. The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs. New York: LexisNexis Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, Rachel. 2016. Photographing the Business of Online Intimacy. The Times, June 10. https://time.com/4326526/the-business-of-online-intimacy/.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1991. ‘Pornography as Defamation and Discrimination.’ Boston University Law Review 71 (5): 793–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1993. Only Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, Catharine A. and Andrea Dworkin. 1997. In Harm’s Way: The Pornography Civil Rights Hearings. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, Alan. 2016. ‘Pornography as a Creative Industry: Challenging the Exceptionalist Approach to Pornography.’ Porn Studies 3 (2): 107–119.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, Brian. 2014. ‘Rethinking the Effects Paradigm in Porn Studies.’ Porn Studies 1 (1–2): 161–171.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Sian and L. J. B. Hayes. 2018. ‘The Electronic Monitoring of Care Work—The Redefinition of Paid Working Time’.’ In Humans and Machines at Work, edited by Phoebe V. Moore, Martin Upchurch and Xanthe Whittaker, 101–124. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Robin. 1980. ‘Theory and Practice: Pornography and Rape.’ In In Take Back the Night: Women on Pornography, edited by Laura Lederer, 125–132. New York: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom. 9 June 2021. Online Nation 2021 Report.
   Google Scholar
• Paasonen, Suasanna, Feona Attwood, Alan McKee, John Mercer and Clarissa Smith. 2021. Objectification: On the Difference Between Sex and Sexism. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patella-Rey, P. J. 2021. ‘Sex Cam Modeling: Labor, Intimacy, and Prosumer Porn.’ (PhD Thesis). University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzutto, Sophie. 2019. ‘From Porn Performer to Porntropreneur: Online Entrepreneurship, Social Media Branding, and Selfhood in Contemporary Trans Pornography.’ AG About Gender-International Journal of Gender Studies 8 (16): 30–60.
   Google Scholar
• Prassl, Jeremias. 2018. Humans as a Service: The Promise and Perils of Work in the Gig Economy. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, Margaret. 1989. ‘The Pragmatist and the Feminist.’ Southern California Law Review 63 (6): 1699–1726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raustiala, Kal and Christopher Jon Sprigman. 2019. ‘The Second Digital Disruption: Streaming and the Dawn of Data-Driven Creativity.’ New York University Law Review 94 (6): 1555–1622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Jude and Melissa Shani Brown. 2018. ‘What Have We Got to Lose? Feminist Campaigning and the Exclusion of Sex from the Supermarket.’ Porn Studies 5 (4): 440–455.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Brishen. 2016. ‘Employment Rights in the Platform Economy: Getting Back to Basics.’ Harvard Law & Policy Review 10 (2): 479–520.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, Gayle S. 2011. Deviations: A Gayle Rubin Reader. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schnably, Stephen J. 1993. ‘Property and Pragmatism: A Critique of Radin's Theory of Property and Personhood.’ Stanford Law Review 45 (2): 347–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, Alexandra. 2008. ‘The Denial of Copyright Protection on Public Policy Grounds.’ European Intellectual Property Review 30 (5): 189–198.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Clarissa. 2012. ‘Reel Intercourse: Doing Sex on Camera.’ In Hard to Swallow: Hard-Core Pornography on Screen, edited by Claire Hines, and Darren Kerr, 194–214. London: Wallflower Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stardust, Zahra. 2019. ‘From Amateur Aesthetics to Intelligible Orgasms: Pornographic Authenticity and Precarious Labour in the Gig Economy.’ AG About Gender-International Journal of Gender Studies 8 (16): 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Strossen, Nadine. 1993. ‘A Feminist Critique of “the” Feminist Critique of Pornography.’ Virginia Law Review 79 (55): 1099–1190.
   Google Scholar
• Strossen, Nadine. 1996. ‘Hate Speech and Pornography: Do We Have to Choose Between Freedom of Speech and Equality.’ Case Western Reserve Law Review 46 (2): 449–478.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Kris. 2021. ‘“Accessing Something That’s Meant to be Inaccessible”: Pornography Viewers’ Reconciliation Between Early Pornographic Memories and Pornography’s Perceived Risk.’ Porn Studies 8 (1): 39–57.
   Google Scholar
• Tushnet, Rebecca. 2007. ‘My Fair Ladies: Sex, Gender, and Fair Use in Copyright.’ American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 15 (2): 273–304.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Nagel, Emily. 2021. ‘Competing Platform Imaginaries of NSFW Content Creation on OnlyFans.’ Porn Studies 8 (4): 394–410.
   Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, Niels and Olav Velthuis. 2018. ‘A Good Hustle: The Moral Economy of Market Competition in Adult Webcam Modeling.’ Journal of Cultural Economy 11 (3): 177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, Georgina. 2015. Stigma and the Shaping of the Pornography Industry. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warhurst, Chris and Dennis Nickson. 2007. ‘A New Labour Aristocracy? Aesthetic Labour and Routine Interactive Service.’ Work, Employment and Society 21 (4): 785–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, Natasha A. and Qian Zhang. 2020. ‘Careers Delivered from the Kitchen? Immigrant Women Small-Scale Entrepreneurs Working in the Growing Nordic Platform Economy.’ NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 28 (2): 113–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, Catharine Pierce. 1995. ‘Pragmatism, Feminism, and the Problem of Bad Coherence.’ Michigan Law Review 93 (6): 1645–1666.
   Google Scholar
• Yurkowski, Rachel A. 2001. ‘Is Hyde Park Hiding the Truth? An Analysis of the Public Interest Defence to Copyright Infringement.’ Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 32 (4): 1053–1086.
   Google Scholar