Friendship and the new politics: beyond community

References

• Anderson, B. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1985. Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2001. Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2016a. “China Accused of Trade ‘Rape’ by Donald Trump.” Accessed July 16 2018. https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-36185275/china-accused-of-trade-rape-by-donald-trump
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2016b. “Daca Dreamers: Trump Vents Anger on Immigrant Programme.” Accessed July 16 2018. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-43612465
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2016c. “Reality Check: Who Voted for Donald Trump?” Accessed April 22 2018. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-37922587
   Google Scholar
• Bernasconi, R. 1993. “On Deconstructing Nostalgia for Community within the West: The Debate between Nancy and Blanchot.” Research in Phenomenology 23 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1163/156916493X00015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devere, H. 2013. “Amity Update: The Academic Debate on Friendship and Politics.” AMITY: the Journal of Friendship Studies 1 (1): 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Devere, H., and P. King. 2000. The Challenge to Friendship in Modernity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Devere, H., and G. M. Smith. 2010. “Friendship and Politics.” Political Studies Review 8 (3): 341–356. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2010.00214.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digeser, P. E. 2013. “Friendship as a Family of Practices.” AMITY: the Journal of Friendship Studies 1 (1): 34–52.
   Google Scholar
• Digeser, P. E. 2016. Friendship Reconsidered: What It Means and How It Matters to Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2016. “Dreaming of Sovereignty.” The Economist. Accessed April 22 2018. https://www.economist.com/britain/2016/03/19/dreaming-of-sovereignty
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2018. “Dancing with Danger: Europe’s Populists are Waltzing into the Mainstream.” The Economist. Accessed April 22 2018. https://www.economist.com/briefing/2018/02/03/europes-populists-are-waltzing-into-the-mainstream
   Google Scholar
• Edyvane, D. 2007. Community and Conflict: The Sources of Liberal Solidarity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Farrands, C. 2001. “Touching Friendship beyond Friendship: Friendship and Citizenship in Global Politics.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 26 (2): 143–173. doi:10.1177/030437540102600203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1993. What are Friends For?: Feminist Perspectives on Personal Relationships and Moral Theory. United States: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, U. 2017. “What Is a Populist? and Is Donald Trump One?” The Atlantic. Accessed April 22 2018. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/02/what-is-populist-trump/516525/
   Google Scholar
• Guinam, J., and T. M. Hanna. 2017. “Lexit: The EU Is a Neoliberal Project, so Let’s Do Something Different When We Leave It.” NewStatesman. Accessed April 22 2018. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/brexit/2017/07/lexit-eu-neoliberal-project-so-lets-do-something-different-when-we-leave-it
   Google Scholar
• Gusterson, H. 2017. “From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the Rise of Nationalist Populism.” American Ethnologist 44 (2): 209–214. doi:10.1111/amet.12469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, M. 2011. “Civic Friendship.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 30 (3): 229–240. doi:10.1007/s11217-011-9221-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, L., and P. McCarthy. 1999. “Hume, Smith and Ferguson: Friendship in Commercial Society.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (4): 33–49. doi:10.1080/13698239908403290.
   Google Scholar
• Judis, J. B. 2016. The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics. New York, NY: Columbia Global Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, S. 2009. “Against Friendship between Countries.” Journal of International Political Theory 5 (1): 59–74. doi:10.3366/E1755088209000329.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, C. 2005. “Love and Communism: Jean-Luc Nancy’s Shattered Community.” Law and Critique 16 (3): 339–355. doi:10.1007/s10978-005-1514-7.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, M. 2017. “Back to the Populist Future?: Understanding Nostalgia in Contemporary Ideological Discourse.” Journal of Political Ideologies 22 (3): 256–273. doi:10.1080/13569317.2017.1346773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. T. 2007. “Friendship in Politics.” In Friendship in Politics, edited by P. T. King and G. M. Smith, 9–30. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen, K. 2006. “Textual Communities: Nancy, Blanchot, Derrida.” Culture Machine: Generating Research in Culture and Theory, Vol. 8. Accessed June 1 2016 https://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/viewArticle/35
   Google Scholar
• Marchart, O. 2007. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, T. 2012. Friendship in an Age of Economics: Resisting the Forces of Neoliberalism. US: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 542–563. doi:10.1111/goop.2004.39.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2013. “Exclusionary Vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America.” Government and Opposition 48 (2): 147–174. doi:10.1017/gov.2012.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. 2017. What Is Populism? London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nancy, J. L. 1991. The Inoperative Community. USA: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nancy, J. L. 2003. “The Confronted Community A.” Postcolonial Studies 6 (1): 23–36. doi:10.1080/13688790308110.
   Google Scholar
• Onuf, N. 2009. “Friendship and Hospitality: Some Conceptual Preliminaries.” Journal of International Political Theory 5 (1): 1–21. doi:10.3366/E1755088209000299.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzenbach, S. A. 1996. “On Civic Friendship.” Ethics 107 (1): 97–128. doi:10.1086/233698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzenbach, S. A. 2009. On Civic Friendship: Including Women in the State. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzmantel, J. 2007. “Community as Communication: Jean-Luc Nancy and ‘Being-In-Common’.” Political Studies 55 (2): 459–476. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00625.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scorza, J. A. 2004. “Liberal Citizenship and Civic Friendship.” Political Theory 32 (1): 85–108. doi:10.1177/0090591703252378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. M. 2011. Friendship and the Political : Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Schmitt. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. M. 2014. “Friendship, State, and Nation.” In Friendship and International Relations, edited by A. Oelsner and S. Koschut, 35–50. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. M. 2018. “Friendship as a Political Concept: A Groundwork for Analysis.” Political Studies Review. doi.org/10.1177/1478929918786856
   Google Scholar
• Spruyt, B., G. Keppens, and F. Van Droogenbroeck. 2016. “Who Supports Populism and What Attracts People to It?” Political Research Quarterly 69 (2): 335–346. doi:10.1177/1065912916639138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strysick, M. 1997. “The End of Community and the Politics of Grammar.” Cultural Critique, no. 36: 195–215. doi:10.2307/1354504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. 2004. “Populism and Representative Politics in Contemporary Europe.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 269–288. doi:10.1080/1356931042000263528.
   Google Scholar
• Tönnies, F. 2001. Community and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuna, E. H. 2014. “The Underridization of Nancy: Tracing the Transformations in Nancy’s Idea of Community.” Journal for Cultural Research 18 (3): 263–272. doi:10.1080/14797585.2013.874630.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, C. H. 2001. “Friends, Compatriots, and Special Political Obligations.” Political Theory 29 (2): 217–236. doi:10.1177/0090591701029002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1993. Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar