Love your enemy? An aesthetic discourse analysis of self-transcendence in values-motivated altruism

References

• Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by D. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agamben, G. 2005. The Time that Remains. Translated by Dai. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alison, J. 2007. “Love Your Enemy: Within a Divided Self” In St. Martin-in-the-Field Autumn Education Program. London. Available at http://www.jamesalison.co.uk/pdf/eng50.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arrowsmith, W. 1963. “A Greek Theater of Ideas.” Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics 2 (3): 32–56. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/20162850
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imgaination: Four Essays. Translated and edited by Emer. M. Holoquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., N. Ahmad, and D. A. Lishner. 2009. “Empathy and Altruism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, edited by C. R. Snyder and S. J. Lopez. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. 1987. “How the Self Became a Problem: A Psychological Review of Historical Research.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (1):163–176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. 2011. “Self and Identity: A Brief Overview of What They Are, What They Do, and How They Work.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1234. 48–55. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06224.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, D., and J. Marecek. 2008. “Dreaming the American Dream: Individualism and Positive Psychology.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2 (5):1767–1780. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00139.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bellinger, M. F. 1927. “A Thousand Years of Quiescence and the Beginning of Sacred Drama”: A Short History of the Drama. New York City: Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Buhler, K. E. 2010. Sola Scriptura: A Dialogue. Kindle. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
   Google Scholar
• Cloninger, C. R. 1999. “A New Conceptual Paradigm from Genetics and Psychobiology for the Science of Mental Health.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 33: 174–186. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.1999.00533.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., and C. D. Batson. 1973. ““From Jerusalem to Jericho”: A Study of Situational and Dispositional Variables in Helping Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27 (1): 100–108. doi:10.1037/h0034449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey, N. 2006. Unquiet Understanding: Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dugatkin, L. A. 2006. The Altruism Equation: Seven Scientists Search for the Origins of Goodness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankl, V. E. 1966. “Self-Transcendence as a Human Phenomenon.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 6: 97–106. doi:10.1177/002216786600600201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankl, V. E. 2011. Man’s Search for Ultimate Meaning. New York: Insight Books.
   Google Scholar
• Frijda, N., and M. Jahoda. 1966. “On the Scope and Methods of Cross-Cultural Research1.” International Journal of Psychology 1 (2): 109–127. doi:10.1080/00207596608247118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. 1981. Reason in the Age of Science. F. G. Lawr. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. 2004. Truth and Method. 2nd ed. New York City: Crossroad.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 1991. The Saturated Self. New York City: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haase, J. E., T. Britt, D. D. Coward, N. K. Leidy, and P. E. Penn. 1992. “Simultaneous Concept Analysis of Spiritual Perspective, Hope, Acceptance and Self-Transcendence.” Journal of Nursing Scholarship 24 (2): 141–147. doi:10.1111/jnu.1992.24.issue-2.
   Google Scholar
• Halkier, B. 2010. “Focus Groups as Social Enactments: Integrating Interaction and Content in the Analysis of Focus Group Data.” Qualitative Research 10 (1): 71–89. doi:10.1177/1468794109348683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., and S. Wiggins. 2005. “Developments in Discursive Psychology.” Discourse and Society 16 (5): 595–601. doi:10.1177/0957926505054937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holoquist, M. 2002. Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. 2nd ed. London and New York City: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holoquist, M. 2010. “The Fugue of Chronotope.” In Bakhtin ’ S Theory of the Literary Chronotope Reflections, Applications, edited by P. Borghart, 19–35. Gent, Belgium: Ginko Academia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keunen, B. 2000. “Bakhtin, Genre Formation, and the Cognitive Turn: Chronotopes as Memory Schemata.” Comparative Literature and Culture 2: 2. doi:10.7771/1481-4374.1069.
   Google Scholar
• Keunen, B. 2010. “The Chrontopic Imagination in Literature and Film: Bakhtin, Bergson and Deleuze on Forms of Time.” In Bakhtin ’ S Theory of the Literary Chronotope Reflections, Applications, edited by P. Borghart, 35–57. Gent, Belgium: Ginkgo Academia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koltko-Rivera, M. E. 2006. “Rediscovering the Later Version of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: Self-Transcendence and Opportunities for Theory, Research, and Unification.” Review of General Psychology 10 (4): 302–317. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.4.302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwee, M. G. 2011. “Relational Buddhism: A Psychological Quest for Meaning and Sustainable Happiness.” In The Human Quest for Meaning, edited by P. T. P. Wong, 249–273. New York City & Hove, U.K.: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, T., K. Hefferon, and I. Ivtzan. 2014. Applied Positive Psychology; Integrated Positive Practice. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Love, M., 2013. Leeds, a Workshop for Peace. Peace Review, 1–8. doi:10.1080/10402659.2013.759775.
   Google Scholar
• Madill, A., A. Jordan, and C. Shirley. 2000. “Objectivity and Reliability in Qualitative Analysis: Realist, Contextualist and Radical Constructionist Epistemologies.” British Journal of Psychology 91 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1348/000712600161646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maingueneau, D. 2002. “Analysis of an Academic Genre.” Discourse Studies 4 (3): 319–342. doi:10.1177/14614456020040030401.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. 1971. The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. New York City: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. H. 2011. Church, Gospel and Empire: How the Politics of Sovereignty Impregnated the West. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock.
   Google Scholar
• Oman, D. 2011. “Compassionate Love: Accomplishments and Challenges in an Emerging Scientific/Spiritual Research Field.” Mental Health, Religion & Culture 14 (9): 945–981. doi:10.1080/13674676.2010.541430.
   Google Scholar
• Piedmont, R. L. 1999. “Does Spirituality Represent the Sixth Factor of Personality? Spiritual Transcendence and the Five-Factor Model.” Journal of Personality 67 (6): 985–1013. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, P. G. 2009. “Demystifying Self-Transcendence for Mental Health Nursing Practice and Research.” Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 23 (5): 397–400. Accessed July 1, 2014 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19766931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnell, T. 2011. “Individual Differences in Meaning-Making: Considering the Variety of Sources of Meaning, Their Density and Diversity.” Personality and Individual Differences 51 (5): 667–673. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. 1994. “Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?.” Journal of Social Issues 50 (4):19–45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, B. 2001. Melodrama and Modernity: Early Sensational Cinema and Its Contexts. New York City: Columbia Univesity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. 2010. Forms of Vitality: Exploring Dynamic Experience in Psychology, The Arts, Psychotherapy and Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E., A. Hepburn, and C. Antaki. 2012. “Beware the `Loughborough School’ of Social Psychology? Interaction and the Politics of Intervention.” British Journal of Social Psychology 51 (3): 486–496. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. 2012. Qualititative Data Analysis Using a Dialogical Approach. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P., and J. McCarthy. 2004. “Toward a Dialogical Perspective on Agency.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (3): 291–309. doi:10.1111/jtsb.2004.34.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Have, P. 2015. “Appendix A: Transcription Conventions.” In Doing Conversation Analysis, edited by P. Ten Have, 216–217. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tileagă, C. 2006. “Representing the “Other”: A Discursive Analysis of Prejudice and Moral Exclusion in Talk about Romanies.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 16 (1): 19–41. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida, Y., and S. Kitayama. 2009. “Happiness and Unhappiness in East and West: Themes and Variations.” Emotion (Washington, D.C.) 9 (4): 441–456. Accessed May 27, 2014 doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.4.302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, G. 2005. Cultural Transformation and Religious Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, A. 1980. “The Function of the Tragic Greek Chorus.” Theatre Journal 32 (2): 205–212. doi:10.2307/3207113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerman, M. A. 2013. “Making Sense of Relational Processes and Other Psychological Phenomena: The Participatory Perspective as a post-Cartesian Alternative to Gergen’s Relational Approach.” Review of General Psychology 17 (4): 358–373. doi:10.1037/a0034447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, P. T. P. 2012. “Introduction: A Quiet Positive Revolution.” In The Positive Psychology of Meaning and Spirituality, edited by P. T. P. Wong, L. C. J. Wong, M. J. McDonald and D. W. Klaasen, 1–8. Birmingham, AL: Purpose Research.
   Google Scholar