What are the politics of love?

References

• Abbott-Smith, G. 1936. A Manual Greek Lexicon of the New Testament. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Agamben, G. 2011. The Kingdom and the Glory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Badiou, A. 2012. In Praise of Love. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C.D. 1991. The Altruism Question: Toward a Social-Psychological Answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauerschmidt, F. C. 2008. Julian of Norwich and the Mystical Body Politic of Christ. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2016. All Our Welfare: Towards Participatory Social Policy. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boff, L. 1997. Cry of the Earth, Cry of the Poor. Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, L. 2011. “Love Your Enemies: Usury, Citizenship and the Friend-Enemy Distinction.” Modern Theology 27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavanaugh, W. 2002. Theo-Political Imagination. London: Bloomsbury T & T Clarke.
   Google Scholar
• Critchley, S. 2012. The Faith of the Faithless. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, H. E. 2017. A Philosophical Anthropology Drawn from Simone Weil’s Writings. Manitoba, Canada: Friesen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. 1994. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Madison, WI: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowley, R. 1987. Towards the Recovery of a Lost Bequest: A Layman’s Work Notes on the Biblical Pattern for a Just Community. London: ECUM. III. Vol. 17.
   Google Scholar
• El Bachri, M. 2017. A Jihad for Love. London: Head of Zeus.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. 1985. The Art of Loving. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Gunton, C. E. 1993. The One the Three and the Many. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1977. “Hannah Arendt’s Communications Concept of Power.” Social Research 44(1): 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2004. Multitude. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. 2001. All About Love. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Horsley, R. A. 2003. Jesus and Empire. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, C. B. 2000. The Great Dance. Jackson, MS: Perichoresis Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaCugna, C. M. 1993. God For Us. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Leftwich, A. 2004. “Thinking Politically: On the Politics of Politics.” In What Is Politics, edited by A. Leftwich. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. S. 2012. The Four Loves. London: Geoffrey Bles. Edition quoted: HarperCollins 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Martin Luther, K. 1990. Strength to Love. Glasgow: William Collins and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., K. I. Pargament and C. E. Thoresen. 2000. Forgiveness: Theory, Research and Practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, T. 1966. “Love and Need.” In Merton Centre Manuscripts. Louisville: Bellarmine University, The Thomas Merton Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Milbank, J., and A. Pabst. 2016. The Politics of Virtue: Post-Liberalism and the Human Future. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, B., and R. Mitchell. 1999. The Sins of the Fathers. Tonbridge, Kent: Sovereign World.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. H. 2011. Church, Gospel and Empire: How the Politics of Sovereignty Impregnated the West. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. H. 2013. The Fall of the Church. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. H., and J. T. Arram, eds. 2014. Discovering Kenarchy: Contemporary Resources for the Politics of Love. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock.
   Google Scholar
• Moltmann, J. 1981. The Trinity and the Kingdom of God. Translated by Margaret Kohl. London: SCM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 2013. Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oman, D. 2011. “Compassionate Love: Accomplishments and Challenges in an Emerging Scientific/Spiritual Research Field.” Mental Health, Religion & Culture 14 (9). doi: 10.1080/13674676.2010.541430.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oord, T. J. 2010. The Nature of Love: A Theology. St Louis Missouri: Chalice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oord, T. J. 2015. The Uncontrolling Love of God: An Open and Relational Account of Providence. Downers Grove, IL: Inter-Varsity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, J., ed. 2001. The Work of Love: Creation as Kenosis. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. & London: SPCK.
   Google Scholar
• Riso, D. R., and R. Hudson. 1999. The Wisdom of the Enneagram. New York: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rohr, R., and M. Morrell. 2016. The Divine Dance. New Kensington, PA: Whittaker House.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. 2007. Theory of the Partisan: Intermediate Commentary on the Concept of the Political. New York: Telos Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. 2008. The Concept of the Political. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, L. 2009. “A Conversation with Michael Hardt on the Politics of Love.” Interval(Le)S II.2-III.1.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfellow, W. S. 2004. An Ethic for Christians and Other Aliens in a Strange Land. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, L. G. 2002. ““The Human Experience of Compassionate Love: Conceptual Mapping and Data from Selected Studies.” In Altruism and Altruistic Love: Science, Philosophy, and Religion in Dialogue, edited by S. G. Post, L. G. Underwood, J. P. Schloss, and W. B. Hurlbut. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, L. G. 2008. “Compassionate Love: A Framework for Research.” In The Science of Compassionate Love: Theory, Research, and Applications, edited by B. Fehr, S. Sprecher, and L. G. Underwood. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wink, W. 1984. Naming the Powers. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wink, W. 1986. Unmasking the Powers. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wink, W. 1989. Engaging the Powers. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, W. P. 2007. The Shack. Thousand Oaks, CA: Windblown Media.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, I. 2004. “Power: Communicative or Political? On the Successful Failure of the Discourse Theory of Power.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 15.
   Google Scholar