208
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Fuzzy AHP approach for legal judgement summarization

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 323-340 | Received 19 Jan 2019, Accepted 10 Aug 2019, Published online: 25 Aug 2019

References

  • Chang, D. (1992). Extent analysis and synthetic decision. In Optimization techniques and applications (p. 352). Singapore: Word Scientific.
  • Cheng Heng, C. H., & Mon, D. L. (1994). Evaluating weapon system by analytical hierarchy process based on fuzzy scales. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 63(1), 1–10.
  • Cheung, J. C. (2008). Comparing abstractive and extractive summarization of evaluative text: Controversiality and content selection (BSc. (Hons.) Thesis in the department of computer science of the faculty of science, University of British Columbia).
  • Chieze, E., Farzindar, A., & Lapalme, G. (2010). An automatic system for summarization and information extraction of legal information. In Semantic processing of legal texts (pp. 216–234). Berlin: Springer.
  • Dr. K. A. Koshy vs. State Of Kerala. (2010, March 1). Indian Kanoon. Retrieved from https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1901058/
  • Farzindar, A., & Guy, L. (2004). “LetSum, an automatic Legal Text Summarizing system.” In T. Gordon (Ed.), Legal knowledge and information systems. Jurix 2004: The seventeenth annual conference (pp. 11–18). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Galgani, F., Compton, P., & Hoffmann, A. (2012). Combining different summarization techniques for legal text. In Proceedings of the workshop on innovative hybrid approaches to the processing of textual data (pp. 115–123). Avignon, France: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  • Grover, C., Hachey, B., Hughson, I., & Korycinski, C. (2016). Automatic summarisation of legal documents. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law(ICAIL '03) (pp. 243–251). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1047788.1047839.
  • Guda, V., Srujana, I., & Naik, M. V. (2011). Reasoning in legal text documents with extracted event information. International Journal of Computer Applications, 28(7), 8–13.
  • Guo, J., Da Xu, L., Xiao, G., & Gong, Z. (2012). Improving multilingual semantic interoperation in cross-organizational enterprise systems through concept disambiguation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 8(3), 647–658.
  • Guo, J., Xu, L., Gong, Z., Che, C. P., & Chaudhry, S. S. (2011). Semantic inference on heterogeneous e-marketplace activities. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, 42(2), 316–330.
  • Gupta, P., Pendluri, V. S., & Vats, I. (2011). Summarizing text by ranking text units according to shallow linguistic features. In 13th international conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT), Phoenix Park (pp. 1620–1625). Seoul, South Korea: IEEE.
  • Hachey, B., & Grover, C. (2006). Extractive summarisation of legal texts. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 14, 305–345.
  • Kanapala, A., Pal, S., & Pamula, R. (2017). Text summarization from legal documents: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 3, 1–32.
  • Kavila, S. D., Puli, V., Raju, G. P., & Bandaru, R. (2013). An automatic legal document summarization and search using hybrid system. In Proceedings of the international conference on frontiers of intelligent computing: Theory and applications (FICTA) (pp. 229–236). Berlin: Springer.
  • Kim, J. H., & Chen, W. (2018). Research topic analysis in engineering management using a Latent Dirichlet Allocation model. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 3(4), 1850016.
  • Kumar, P., Singh, R. K., & Sinha, P. (2016). Optimal site selection for a hospital using a fuzzy extended ELECTRE approach. Journal of Management Analytics, 3(2), 115–135.
  • Kuo, R. J., Chi, S. C., & Kao, S. S. (1999). A decision support system for locating convenience store through fuzzy AHP. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 37(1-2), 323–332.
  • Li, J., Wang, K., & Xu, L. (2009). Chameleon based on clustering feature tree and its application in customer segmentation. Annals of Operations Research, 168(1), 225–245.
  • Megala, S. S., Kavitha, A., & Marimuthu, A. (2014). Enriching text summarization using fuzzy logic. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 1, 5863–5867.
  • Mezghanni, I. B., & Gargouri, F. (2016). Detecting hidden structures from Arabic electronic documents: Application to the legal field. In 14th International conference on software engineering research, management and applications (SERA) (pp. 75–81). Towson, MD: IEEE.
  • Nagwani, N. K. (2015). Summarizing large text collection using topic modeling and clustering based on MapReduce framework. Journal of Big Data, 2(1), 1–18.
  • Nobata, C., & Satoshi, S. (2004). CRL/NYU summarization system at DUC-2004. In Proceedings of DUC. Boston.
  • Othman, B. M. M., Haggag, M., & Belal, M. (2014). A taxonomy for text summarization. Information Science and Technology, 3(1), 43–50.
  • Polsley, S., Jhunjhunwala, P., & Huang, R. (2016). Casesummarizer: A system for automated summarization of legal Texts. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th international conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (pp. 258–262). Osaka, Japan: The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee.
  • Raghav, K., Reddy, P. B., Reddy, V. B., & Reddy, P. K. (2015). Text and citations based cluster analysis of legal judgments. In R. Prasath, A. Vuppala, & T. Kathirvalavakumar (Eds.), International conference on mining intelligence and knowledge exploration (pp. 449–459). Cham: Springer.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Saravanan, M., & Ravindran, B. (2010). Identification of rhetorical roles for segmentation and summarization of a legal judgment. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 18(1), 45–76.
  • Sarvaanan, M., Ravindran, B., & Raman, S. (2006). Improving legal document summarization using graphical models. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 152, 51–60.
  • Teixeira, C., Lopes, I., & Figueiredo, M. (2018). Classification methodology for spare parts management combining maintenance and logistics perspectives. Journal of Management Analytics, 5(2), 116–135.
  • Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1–3), 229–241.
  • Vatansever, K., & Akgul, Y. (2014). Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for evaluating service quality of private shopping website quality: A case study in Turkey. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 3(3), 283–301.
  • Wagh, R. S. (2013). Knowledge discovery from legal documents dataset using text mining techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications, 66, 23–30.
  • Xu, S., Da Xu, L., & Chen, X. (2003). Determining optimum edible films for kiwifruits using an analytical hierarchy process. Computers & Operations Research, 30(6), 877–886.
  • Xuan, H., Xu, L., & Li, L. (2009). A CA-based epidemic model for HIV/AIDS transmission with heterogeneity. Annals of Operations Research, 168(1), 81–99.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.