A new method for performance evaluation of decision-making units with application to service industry

References

• Ahmadi, K. , & Ebrahimi, M. (2019). A novel algorithm based on information diffusion and fuzzy madm methods for analysis of damages caused by diabetes crisis. Applied Soft Computing , 76 , 205–220. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, A. I. , & Seiford, L. M. (1990). Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis. Operations Research Letters , 9 (6), 403–405. doi: 10.1016/0167-6377(90)90061-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D. , Charnes, A. , & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science , 30 (9), 1078–1092. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, S. A. , Førsund, F. R. , & Jansen, E. S. (1992). Malmquist indices of productivity growth during the deregulation of norwegian banking, 1980–89. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics , 94 , S211–S228. doi: 10.2307/3440261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, J. P. , & Vincke, P. (1985). Note-a preference ranking organisation method: The promethee method for multiple criteria decision-making. Management Science , 31 (6), 647–656. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, J. P. , Vincke, P. , & Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The promethee method. European Journal of Operational Research , 24 (2), 228–238. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, T. W. , & Li, L. (2005). The utility of returns to scale in dea programming: An analysis of Michigan rural hospitals. European Journal of Operational Research , 161 (2), 469–477. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A. , Cooper, W. W. , & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research , 2 (6), 429–444. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. M. , & Delmas, M. A. (2012). Measuring eco-inefficiency: A new frontier approach. Operations Research , 60 (5), 1064–1079. doi: 10.1287/opre.1120.1094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. (2005). On preference structure in data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making , 4 (3), 411–431. doi: 10.1142/S0219622005001647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Y. H. , Färe, R. , & Grosskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management , 51 (3), 229–240. doi: 10.1006/jema.1997.0146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. , & Green, R. (1993). Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making. Omega , 21 (6), 713–715. doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(93)90013-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. S. , Fishburn, P. C. , Steuer, R. E. , Wallenius, J. , & Zionts, S. (1992). Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: The next ten years. Management Science , 38 (5), 645–654. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.38.5.645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golany, B. , & Roll, Y. (1989). An application procedure for DEA. Omega , 17 (3), 237–250. doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(89)90029-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, B. H. , & Sickles, R. C. (1992). Finite sample evidence on the performance of stochastic frontiers and data envelopment analysis using panel data. Journal of Econometrics , 51 (1–2), 259–284. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90038-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailu, A. , & Veeman, T. S. (2001). Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: an application to the canadian pulp and paper industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 83 (3), 605–616. doi: 10.1111/0002-9092.00181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, C. L. , & Yoon, K. (2012). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey (Vol. 186). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99–127). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Khouja, M. (1995). The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering , 28 (1), 123–132. doi: 10.1016/0360-8352(94)00032-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohl, S. , Schoenfelder, J. , Fügener, A. , & Brunner, J. O. (2019). The use of data envelopment analysis (dea) in healthcare with a focus on hospitals. Health Care Management Science , 22 (2), 245–286. doi: 10.1007/s10729-018-9436-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, T. (1951). Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In T. C. Koopmans (Ed.), Activity analysis of production and allocation. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. S. , Chu, C. W. , & Zhu, J. (2011). Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility. European Journal of Operational Research , 212 (1), 141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F. , Zhu, Q. , & Liang, L. (2019). A new data envelopment analysis based approach for fixed cost allocation. Annals of Operations Research , 274 (1–2), 347–372. doi: 10.1007/s10479-018-2819-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P. , Jin, F. , Zhang, X. , Su, Y. , & Wang, M. (2011). Research on the multi-attribute decision-making under risk with interval probability based on prospect theory and the uncertain linguistic variables. Knowledge-Based Systems , 24 (4), 554–561. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W. , Meng, W. , Li, X. , & Zhang, D. (2010). DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs. Annals of Operations Research , 173 (1), 177–194. doi: 10.1007/s10479-009-0587-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W. , Sharp, J. , & Wu, Z. (2006). Preference, production and performance in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research , 145 (1), 105–127. doi: 10.1007/s10479-006-0042-7
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W. , Zhou, Z. , Ma, C. , Liu, D. , & Shen, W. (2015). Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs. Omega , 56 , 74–87. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotfi, F. H. , Fallahnejad, R. , & Navidi, N. (2011). Ranking efficient units in dea by using topsis method. Applied Mathematical Sciences , 5 (17), 805–815.
   Google Scholar
• Manohar, S. , & Kapur, G. (2019). Measuring perceived service innovation typologies in retail industry. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management , 4 (2), 1850019. doi: 10.1142/S2424862218500197
   Google Scholar
• Nishimizu, M. , & Page, J. M. (1982). Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change: Dimensions of productivity change in yugoslavia, 1965–78. Economic Journal , 92 (368), 920–936. doi: 10.2307/2232675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkan, C. , & Wu, M. L. (1999). Decision-making and performance measurement models with applications to robot selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering , 36 (3), 503–523. doi: 10.1016/S0360-8352(99)00146-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavličić, D. (2001). Normalization affects the results of madm methods. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research , 11 (2), 251–265.
   Google Scholar
• Pourhassan, M. R. , & Raissi, S. (2017). An integrated simulation-based optimization technique for multi-objective dynamic facility layout problem. Journal of Industrial Information Integration , 8 , 49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheel, H. (2001). Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. European Journal of Operational Research , 132 (2), 400–410. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00160-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford, L. M. , & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research , 142 (1), 16–20. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00293-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E. , Boussofiane, A. , & Dyson, R. G. (1996). A comparison of data envelopment analysis and ratio analysis as tools for performance assessment. Omega , 24 (3), 229–244. doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(95)00060-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng, G. H. , & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications . Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Viriyasitavat, W. (2016). Multi-criteria selection for services selection in service workflow. Journal of Industrial Information Integration , 1 , 20–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2016.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. M. , & Luo, Y. (2006). DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision making units. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 173 (2), 902–915. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. M. , & Parkan, C. (2005). Multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives: Ranking and weighting. Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 153 (3), 331–346. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2005.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. (2008). On multi-period multi-attribute decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems , 21 (2), 164–171. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2007.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. P. , & Hwang, C. L. (1995). Multiple attribute decision making: An introduction (Vol. 104). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K. , Turskis, Z. , & Kildienė, S. (2014). State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy , 20 (1), 165–179. doi: 10.3846/20294913.2014.892037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T. (2009). Some sharp performance bounds for least squares regression with l1 regularization. Annals of Statistics , 37 (5A), 2109–2144. doi: 10.1214/08-AOS659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar