Comparison of Ontario’s roundwood and recycled fibre pulp and paper mills’ performance using data Envelopment analysis

References

• AAC. (2015). Ontario wood pulp industry and Ontario paper industry: Economic obsolescence analysis. Toronto, ON: Municipal Property Assessment Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Aunan, L., & Birmingham, S. (1992). Recycling the news: A study of recycled newsprint content of the Nation's largest newspapers. Portland: National Environmental Law Centre and U.S. Public Interest Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092. doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari, A.K., & Valiyattoor, V. (2016). Efficiency and related technological aspects of the Indian food processing industry: A non-parametric analysis. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50, 227–243.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdanski, B. (2014). The rise and fall of the Canadian pulp and paper sector. The Forestry Chronicle, 90, 785–793. doi:10.5558/tfc2014-151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdages, J. (1993). Paper recycling in Canada: A new reality. Ottawa, ON: Library of Parilament: Report prepared for Science and Technology Division.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, T. W., & Li, L. (2005). The utility of returns to scale in DEA programming: An analysis of Michigan rural hospitals. European Journal of Operational Research, 161, 469–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambost, V., Mcnutt, J., & Stuart, P. (2008). Guided tour: Implementing the forest biorefinery (FBR) at existing pulp and paper mills. Pulp and Paper Canada, 109, 19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. T., Park, H. S., Jeong, J. B. & Lee, J. W. (2014). Evaluating economic and environmental efficiency of global airlines: A SBM-DEA approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 27, 46–50. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelli, T., Rao, D., O'Donnell, C., & Battese, G. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2011). Handbook on data envelopment analysis. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• CPPA. (1986). Reference Tables. Montreal, QC: Canadian Pulp and Paper Association.
   Google Scholar
• CPPA (Canadian Pulp and Paper Association). (1992). Reference Tables. Montreal, QC: Canadian Pulp and Paper Association https://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/publications?id=32198&lang=en_CA
   Google Scholar
• CPPA. (1999). Reference Tables. Montreal, QC: Canadian Pulp and Paper Association.
   Google Scholar
• Daya, B., & Nourelfath, M. (2018). Sustainability assessment of integrated forest biorefinery implemented in Canadian pulp and paper mills. International Journal of Production Economics, 214, 248–265 doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Balteiro, L., & Romero, C. (2008). Making forestry decisions with multiplecriteria: A review and an assessment. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 3222–3241. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka, C. A. (2007). Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy, 32, 1055–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. (1994). Production frontiers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goyal, J., Singh, M., Singh, R., & Aggarwal, A. (2019). Efficiency and technology gaps in Indian banking sector: Application of meta-frontier directional distance function DEA approach. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 5, 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfds.2018.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Hetemäki, L. (2010). Information and communication technology. In G. Mery, P. Katila, G. Galloway, R. I. Alfaro, M. Kanninen, M. Lobo-vikov, & J. Varjo (Eds.), Forests and society – responding to global drivers of change. 25 (pp. 159–165). Vienna: IUFRO World Series.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., Lin, W., Ramaswamy, S., & Tschirner, U. (2009). Process modeling of com- prehensive integrated forest biorefinery - an integrated approach. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnololgy, 154, 26–37. doi:10.1007/s12010-008-8478-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, C. (1993). Production frontiers and productive efficiency. In H. O. Fried & S. S. Schmidt (Eds.), The measurement of productive effiiciency: Techniques and applications (pp. 3–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machani, M. M. (2014). A mathematically-based framework for evaluating the technical and economic potential of integrating bioenergy production within pulp and paper mills. Biomass Bioenergy, 63, 126–139. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.02.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, S., & Norcliffe, G. (1997). Restructuring in the Canadian newsprint industry. The Canadian Geographer, 41, 2–6. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.1997.tb00926.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansoornejad, B., Pistikopoulos, E., & Stuart, P. (2013). Scenario-based strategic supply chain design and analysis for the forest biorefinery using an operational supply chain model. International Journal of Production Economics, 144, 618–634. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClay, B. (1991). Recycling in the Canadian pulp and paper industry. The Forestry Chronicle, 67, 532–534. doi:10.5558/tfc67532-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, F., Su, B., & Bai, Y. (2019). Rank reversal issues in DEA models for China’s regional energy efficiency assessment. Energy Efficiency, 12, 993–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. (2001). Selected forestry statistics Canada. Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. (2016). Selected forestry statistics Canada. Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada.
   Google Scholar
• PPPC. (2015). Use of recycled fibre. Montreal, QC: Ontario Electronic Facility Annual Return System Database.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, T. (1994). Newsprint: Canadian supply and American demand. Durham, NC: Forest History Society.
   Google Scholar
• Salehirad, N., & Sowlati, T. (2006). Dynamic efficiency analysis of primary wood producers in British Columbia. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45, 1179–1188. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2006.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Shahi, S., & Dia, M. (2019). Performance analysis of Ontario’s pulp and paper mills using bootstrap data envelopment analysis. St. Catharines, ON: Administrative Sciences Association of Canada (ASAC), Management Science Division.
   Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44, 49–61. doi:10.1287/mnsc.44.1.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowlati, T. (2005). Efficiency studies in forestry using data envelopment analysis. Forest Products Journal, 55, 49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2018). Gross domestic product at basic prices, by industry, monthly. Retrieved March 22, 2018, from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3610043401
   Google Scholar
• Toivanen, H. (2004). Learning and corporate strategy: The dynamic evolution of the North American pulp and paper industry, 1860–1960. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Toma, P., Miglietta, P., Zurlini, G., Valente, D., & Petrosillo, I. (2017). A non-parametric bootstrap-data enevelopment analysis approach for environmental policy planning and management of agricultural efficiency in EU countries. Ecological Indicators, 83, 132–143. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, H., Frey, G., Yude, G., Cubbage, F., & Zhaohui, Z. (2018). Reform and efficiency of state-owned forest enterprises in Northeast China as “social firms”. Journal of Forest Economics, 30, 18–33.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Park, Y. S., Park, J. D., & Cho, W. (2020). Evaluating the environmental efficiency of the US airline industry using a directional distance function DEA approach. Journal of Management Analytics, 1–18. doi:10.1080/23270012.2020.1832925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Wan, G., & Zheng, E. (2014). A predictive DEA model for outlier detection. Journal of Management Analytics, 1, 20–41.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. J., & Chen, M. Y. (2017). Evaluating the dynamic performance of energy portfolios: Empirical evidence from the DEA directional distance function. European Journal of Operational Research, 269, 64–78. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, S., & Zhan, Y. (2020). A new method for performance evaluation of decision-making units with application to service industry. Journal of Management Analytics, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar