Having a syntactic choice is not always better: the effects of syntactic flexibility on Korean production

References

• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M., & Sarkar, D. (2007). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R-package version 0.99875-6).
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., D'Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Székely, A., Andonova, E., Devescovi, A., …, Tzeng, O. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(2), 344–380. doi:10.3758/BF03196494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K. (1986). Meaning, sound, and syntax: lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 575–586. 10.1037/0278-7393.12.4.575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K. (1987). Coordinating words and syntax in speech plans. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 3, pp. 337–390). London: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., & Ferreira, V. S. ( to appear). Syntactically speaking. In V. Ferreira, M. Goldrick, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (1992–2011). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A. (1994). The interaction of referential ambiguity and argument structure in the parsing of prepositional phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 251–283. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, W. (1983). On numerals and numeral classifier construction in Korean. Language Research, 19, 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., & Trueswell, J. C. (2010). Children's (in)ability to recover from garden-paths in a verb-final language: Evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 41–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, M., & Kwak, H.-Y. (2008). Using Korean: A guide to contemporary usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139168496
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1994). Inhibition in interactive activation models of linguistic selection and sequencing. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language (pp. 409–453). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennison, H. Y. (2008). Universal versus language-specific conceptual effects on shifted word-order production in Korean: Evidence from bilinguals. Working Papers in Linguistics, 39(2), University of Hawaiiat Manoa. pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, V. S. (1996). Is it better to give than to donate? Syntactic flexibility in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 724–755. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, V. S., & Slevc, L. R. (2007). Grammatical encoding. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flores d'Arcais, G. B. (1975). Some perceptual determinants of sentence construction. In G. B. F. d'Arcais (Ed.), Studies in perception: Festschrift for Fabio Metelli (pp. 344–373). Milan, Italy: Martello-Giunti.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A., & Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Models of speaker choice in production: Integrating information and availability. Talk presented at the 21st Annual CUNY Conference on Sentence Processing. Chapel Hill, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 58–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L. R., January, D., Nappa, R., & Trueswell, J. C. (2007). On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 544–569. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, Z. M. (2001). Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82(1), B1–B14. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00138-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S.-H. (1999). Numerals and numeral classifier phrases. Dictionary Publishing Research, 9(1), 265–289.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Westenberg, C. (2000). Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition, 75, B27–B39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. (2012). Flexibility in Language production ( PhD dissertation). University of Southern California. Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Kaiser, E. (2009). The effects of perceptual vs. lexical primes on sentence production in Korean: An on-line investigation of event apprehension and sentence formulation. Talk presented at the 22nd annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. UC Davis. Davis, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Kaiser, E. (2012). Coordinating lexical and structural information during language production: Evidence from semantic and structural priming. Poster presented at the 25th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. CUNY. New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H. & Kaiser, E. ( under revision). Coordination of lexical and structural information during English and Korean production.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Kaiser, E. ( under revision). The role of verb in grammatical function assignment in English and Korean.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2006). Redundancy and Syntactic Reduction in Spontaneous Speech. PhD thesis, Stanford University. Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F., & Norcliffe, E. J. (2009). The cross-linguistic study of sentence production. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(4), 866–887. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00147.x
   Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). Prediction and thematic information in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-B. (2006). Syntax and semantics of numeral classifier constructions in Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar, 44, 147–173.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T. (2008). Subject and object markings in conversational Korean ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T., & Lee, H. (2010). An empirical approach to quantifier floating in Korean. The Linguistic Association of Korean Journal, 18(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-H. (1983). Syntax of Korean numeral phrases. Seoul, Korea: Top Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, H., & Lee, J. (1996). Effects of semantic and phonological similarity features on speech production in Korean: An analysis of laboratory-induced speech errors. Proceedings of the '96 Conference on Hangul and Korean Language Processing. 114–122.
   Google Scholar
• Kuchinsky, S. E. (2009). From seeing to saying: Perceiving, planning, producing ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Kuchinsky, S. E., & Bock, J. K. (2010). From seeing to saying: Perceiving, planning, producing. Paper presented at the CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, New York University, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lachman, R. (1973). Uncertainty effects on time to access the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 199–208. doi:10.1037/h0034633
   Google Scholar
• Lachman, R., & Lachman, J. L. (1980). Picture naming: Retrieval and activation of long-term memory. In L. W. Poon, J. L. Fozard, L. S. Cermak, D. Arenberg, & L. W. Thompson (Eds.), New directions in memory and aging (pp. 313–343). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., & Maassen, B. (1981). Lexical search and order of mention in sentence production. In W. Klein & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), Crossing the linguistic boundaries (pp. 221–252). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R. & Jaeger, T. F. (2007). Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction. In B. Schölkopf, J. Platt, & T. Hoffman (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 (pp. 849–856). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory and Cognition, 7, 485–495. doi:10.3758/BF03198265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407. 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. B. (1989). How many memory systems? Evidence from aging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(1), 31–49. 10.1037/0278-7393.15.1.31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myachykov, A., Garrod, S., & Scheepers, C. (2010). Attention-capturing priming of structural choice during English and Finnish sentence production. In R. K. Mishra & N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Language and cognition: State of the art. Munich: Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Myachykov, A., Scheepers, C., Garrod, S., Thompson D., & Fedorova, O. (2013). Syntactic flexibility and competition in sentence production: The case of English and Russian. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(8), 1601–1619. 10.1080/17470218.2012.754910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myachykov A., Thompson D., Scheepers C., & Garrod S. (2011). Visual attention and structural choice in sentence production across languages. Language and Linguistic Compass, 5(2), 95–107. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00265.x
   Google Scholar
• Myachykov, A., & Tomlin, R. (2008). Attention-capturing priming and structural choice in Russian sentence production. Journal of Cognitive Science, 6(1), 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S.-Y. (2009). Functional categories: The syntax of DP and DegP ( PhD dissertation). University of Southern California. Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2002). Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 586–605. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, K. (2007). Partitive structures ( PhD dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49(3), 238–299. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, H. (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stallings, L. M., MacDonald, M. C., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1998). Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: Phrase length and verb disposition in heavy-NP shift. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 392–417. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, M. N., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Pickering, M. J. (2011). Conceptual influences on word order and voice in sentence production: Evidence from Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 318–330. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. E. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634. doi:10.1126/science.7777863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89–134. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00032-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. (2012). Modern statistics for the social and behavioral sciences: A practical introduction. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar