Atypical phonological processing impairs written word recognition in children with cochlear implants

References

• Ahissar, M. (2007). Dyslexia and the anchoring-deficit hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 458–465. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archbold, S., Harris, M., O’Donoghue, G., Nikolopoulos, T., White A., & Richmond, H. L. (2008). Reading abilities after cochlear implantation: The effect of age at implantation on outcomes at 5 and 7 years after implantation. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 72, 1471–1478. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banai, K., Hornickel, J., Skoe, E., Nicol, T., Zecker, S. G., & Kraus, N. (2009). Reading and subcortical auditory function. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2699–2707. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berent, I., Lennertz, T., & Balaban, E. (2012). Language universals and misidentification: A two-way street. Language and Speech, 55, 311–330. doi:10.1177/0023830911417804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, L. E. (1983). Perceptual development for labeling words varying in voice onset time and fundamental-frequency. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 383–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boets, B., Op de Beeck, H. P., Vandermosten, M., Scott, S. K., Gillebert, C. R., Mantini, D., … Ghesquière, P. (2013). Intact but less accessible phonetic representations in adults with dyslexia. Science, 342, 1251–1254. doi:10.1126/science.1244333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogliotti, C. (2003). Relation between categorical perception of speech and reading acquisition. In M. J. Solé, D. Recaesens, & J. Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international Congress of phonetic science (pp. 885–888). Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Bogliotti, C., Serniclaes, W., Messaoud-Galusi, S., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2008). Discrimination of speech sounds by children with dyslexia: Comparisons with chronological age and reading level controls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 137–155. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2000). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Available from http://www.praat.org
   Google Scholar
• Bouton, S., Serniclaes, W., Bertoncini J., & Colé, P. (2012). Categorical perception of speech sounds in French-speaking children with cochlear implant. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 55, 139–153. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0330)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouton, S., Bertoncini, J., Serniclaes, W., & Colé, P. (2011). Reading and reading related skills in children using cochlear implants: Prospects for the influence of cued speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16, 458–473. doi:10.1093/deafed/enr014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, D. (2003). Language specific speech perception and the onset of reading. Reading and Writing, 16, 573–609. doi:10.1023/A:1025593911070
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, D. K., Earnshaw, L. J., & Clark, J. E. (1991). Development of categorical identification of native and non native bilabial stops: Infants, children and adults. Journal of Child Language, 18, 231–260. doi:10.1017/S0305000900011041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappe, P., Chiappe, D. L., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). Speech perception, lexicality, and reading skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80(1), 58–74. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colin, S., Lina-Granade, G., Truy, E., Ecalle, J., Pénillard, A., & Magnan, A. (2010). Reading abilities in deaf children: Respective and/or combined contribution of early age of cochlear implantation and exposition to cued speech. Cochlear Implants international, 11(Suppl. 1), 278–281. doi:10.1179/146701010X12671177989192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Content, A., & Radeau, M. (1988). Données statistiques sur la structure orthographique du Français [Statistical data on spelling structure of French]. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 87, 399–404.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, C. M., de Jong, K., & Pisoni, D. B. (2012). Phonological awareness, reading skills, and vocabulary knowledge in children who use cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17, 205–226. doi:10.1093/deafed/enr043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman, M., Loizou, P., Spahr, A., & Maloff, E. (2002). Factors that allow a high level of speech understanding by patients fit with cochlear implants. American Journal of Audiology, 11(2), 119–123. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2002/014)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn, C. C., Walker, E., Oleson, J., Kenworthy, M., Van Voorst, T., Tomblin, J.B., … Gantz, B. J. (2014). Longitudinal development of speech perception and language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users: The effect of age at implantation and long term outcomes. Ear and Hearing, 35, 148–160. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182a4a8f0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, M. K., Pisoni, D. B., Horn, D. L., & Dillon, C. M. (2007). Neuropsychological correlates of vocabulary, reading, and working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12, 461–471. doi:10.1093/deafed/enm023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Baskent, D., & Wang, X. (2001). Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 1150–1163. doi:10.1121/1.1381538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., & Cruz, R. J. (2005). Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear Implants. Audiology & Neurotology, 10, 169–184. doi:10.1159/000084027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers, A. E. (2003). Predictors of reading skill development in children with early cochlear implantation. Ear and Hearing, 24(Suppl.), 59S–68S. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000051690.43989.5D
   Google Scholar
• Geers, A., Brenner, C., & Davidson, L. (2003). Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five. Ear and Hearing, 24(Suppl. 1), 24S–35S. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000051687.99218.0F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnansia, D., Lazard, D. S., Léger, A. C., Fugain, C., Lancelin, D., Meyer, B., & Lorenzi, C. (2014). Role of slow temporal modulations in speech identification for cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology, 53(1), 48–54. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.844367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsworthy, R. L., Delhorne, L. A., Braida, L. D., & Reed, C. M. (2013). Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners. Trends in Amplification, 17(1), 27–44. doi:10.1177/1084713813477244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goswami, U., Ziegler, J., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in reading development in English and German. Journal of Memory & Language, 45, 648–664. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. R., Beukelman, D. R., & Ball, L. J. (2004). Algorithmic estimation of pauses in extended speech samples of dysarthric and typical speech. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 149–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Reading acquisition, phonology, and dyslexia: Insights from a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662–720. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M., & Terlektsi, E. (2011). Reading and spelling abilities of deaf adolescents with cochlear implants and hearing AIDS. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(1), 24–34. doi:10.1093/deafed/enq031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasko, S., Groth, K., Bruder, J., Bartling, J., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2013). The time course of reading processes in children with and without dyslexia: An ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 570. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havy, M., Nazzi, T., & Bertoncini, J. (2013). Phonetic processing during the acquisition of new words in 3-to-6-year-old French-speaking deaf children with cochlear implants. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46, 181–192. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, V., & Barrett, S. (2000). The development of phonemic categorization in children aged 6–12. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 377–396. doi:10.1006/jpho.2000.0121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoonhorst, I., Colin, C., Markessis, E., Radeau, M., Deltenre, P., & Serniclaes, W. (2009). French native speakers in the making: From language-general to language-specific voicing boundaries. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 353–366. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoonhorst, I., Medina, V., Colin, C., Markessis, E., Radeau, M., Deltenre, P., & Serniclaes, W. (2011). Categorical perception of voicing, colors and facial expressions: A developmental study. Speech Communication, 53, 417–430. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2010.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornickel, J., Anderson, S., Skoe, E., Yi, H.-G., & Kraus, N. (2012). Subcortical representation of speech fine structure relates to reading ability, NeuroReport, 23(1), 6–9. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834d2ffd
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson, P. (2003). Evaluating the function of phonetic perceptual phenomena within speech recognition: An examination of the perception of /d/–/t/ by adult cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 1056–1064. doi:10.1121/1.1531985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson, P. & Kuhl, P. K. (1996). Influences of phonetic identification and category goodness on American listeners' perception of /r/ and /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1130–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kral, A., & Sharma, A. (2012). Developmental neuroplasticity after cochlear implantation. Trends in Neurosciences, 35, 111–122. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, N., & Anderson, S. (2013). For reading development, auditory processing is fundamental. The Hearing Journal, 66(9), 40. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000434625.54514.1d
   Google Scholar
• Lane, H., Denny, M., Guenther, F., Hanson, H., Marrone, N., Matthies, M., … Zandipour, M. (2007). On the structure of phoneme categories in listeners with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 50(1), 2–14. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/001)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazard, D. S., Lee, H. J., Truy, E., & Giraud, A.-L. (2013). Bilateral reorganization of posterior temporal cortices in post-lingual deafness and its relation to cochlear implant outcome. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 1208–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefavrais, P. (1967). Test de l’Alouette: Manuel [Alouette: A standardized reading test]. Paris: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
   Google Scholar
• Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36, 156–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leybaert, J., & LaSasso, C. J. (2010). Cued speech for enhancing speech perception and first language development of children with cochlear implants. Trends in Amplification, 14(2), 96–112. doi:10.1177/1084713810375567
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loizou, P. C. (1998). Mimicking the human ear. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 15(5), 101–130. doi:10.1109/79.708543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loizou, P. C. (2006). Speech processing in vocoder-centric cochlear implants. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 64, 109–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macmillan, N. A. & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Medina, M., Hoonhorst, I., Bogliotti, C., & Serniclaes, W. (2010). Development of voicing perception in French: Comparing adults, adolescents and children. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 493–503. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, V., & Serniclaes, W. (2009). Consecuencias de la categorización fonológica sobre la lectura silenciosa de niños sordos con implante coclear [Results of phonological categorization on silent reading in children using cochlear implants]. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 29, 186–194.
   Google Scholar
• Mousty, P., & Leybaert, J. (1999). Evaluation des habilités de lecture et d’orthographe au moyen de BELEC: Données longitudinales auprès d’enfants francophones testés en 2ème et 4ème années [Evaluation of reading and spelling ability by means of the BELEC]. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 4, 325–342.
   Google Scholar
• Nittrouer, S. (1992). Age-related differences in perceptual effects of formant transitions within syllables and across syllable boundaries. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Nittrouer, S. (1996). Discriminability and perceptual weighting of some acoustic cues to speech perception by 3-year-olds. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 39, 278–297. doi:10.1044/jshr.3902.278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer, S. (2002). Learning to perceive speech: How fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 711–719. doi:10.1121/1.1496082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer, S., & Miller, M. E. (1997). Predicting developmental shifts in perceptual weighting schemes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2253–2266. doi:10.1121/1.418207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, E., Serniclaes, W., Mitterer, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2012). Allophonic mode of speech perception in children at risk for dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1469–1483. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.03.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273–315. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the connectionist dual process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 106–151. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pothier, B., & Pothier, P. (2004). Echelle d’acquisition en orthographe lexicale [Standardized scale of spelling skills]. Paris: Edition Retz.
   Google Scholar
• Ramus, F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: Specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 212–218. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00035-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramus, F., & Szenkovits, G. (2008). What phonological deficit? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 129–141. doi:10.1080/17470210701508822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripamonti, E., Aggujaro, S., Molteni, F., Zonca, G., Frustaci, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2014). The anatomical foundations of acquired reading disorders: A neuropsychological verification of the dual-route model of reading. Brain and Language, 134, 44–67. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorr, E. A., Fox, N. A., van Wassenhove, V., & Knudsen, E. I. (2005). Auditory-visual fusion in speech perception in children with cochlear implants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 18748–18750. doi:10.1073/pnas.0508862102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serniclaes, W., Van Heghe, S., Mousty, P., Carré, R., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2004). Allophonic mode of speech perception in dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 336–361. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, R., Zeng, F., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303–304. doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95–129. doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., Campbell, J., & Gordon, G. (in press). Developmental and cross-modal plasticity in deafness: Evidence from the P1 and N1 event related potentials in cochlear implanted children. International Journal of Psychophysiology.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., Dorman, M. F., & Kral, A. (2005). The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hearing Research, 203(1–2), 134–143. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2004.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slawinski, E. B., & Fitzgerald, L. K. (1998). Perceptual development of the categorization of the ⁄ r-w ⁄ contrast in normal children. Journal of Phonetics, 26(1), 27–43. doi:10.1006/jpho.1997.0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L. J., & Tomblin, J. B. (2009). Evaluating phonological processing skills in children with prelingual deafness who use cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(1), 1–21. doi:10.1093/deafed/enn013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Béchennec, D., & Kipffer-Piquard, A. (2005). Lecture et compétences reliées: Données normatives pour la fin de la 1ère, 2nde, 3ème et 4ème année du primaire issues d’une nouvelle batterie de tests, EVALEC [Standardized norms on the development of reading and related skills in French, EVALEC]. European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 55, 157–186.
   Google Scholar
• Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., & Serniclaes, W. (2006). Reading acquisition and developmental dyslexia. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L.S., Béchennec, D., & Serniclaes, W. (2003). Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading, and in spelling: A four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 194–217. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00024-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray, N., Spencer, L., & Gilbert-Bedia, E. (1995). Relationships between speech production and speech perception skills in young cochlear-implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 2454–2460. doi:10.1121/1.413278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandermosten, M., Boets, B., Luts, H., Poelmans, H., Wouters, J., & Ghesquière, P. (2011). Impairments in speech and nonspeech sound categorization in children with dyslexia are driven by temporal processing difficulties. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 593–603. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2–40. doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, A. M., Van Bon, W., Schreuder, R., Knoors, H., & Snik, A. (2007). Reading comprehension of deaf children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12, 283–302. doi:10.1093/deafed/enm017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wible, B., Nicol, T, & Kraus, N. (2004). Atypical brainstem representation of onset and formant structure of speech sounds in children with language-based learning problems. Biological Psychology, 67, 299–317. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., & Zheng, Y. (2007). Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 1758–1764. doi:10.1121/1.2767000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A., & Klüppel, D. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: Still a challenge for current word recognition models. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human perception and performance, 27, 547–559. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.3.547
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369, 1634–1644.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Van Orden, G., & Jacobs, A. (1997). Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 23, 845–860. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar