Auditory evoked potentials reveal early perceptual effects of distal prosody on speech segmentation

References

• Abla, D., Katahira, K., & Okanoya, K. (2008). Online assessment of statistical learning by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 952–964. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00324.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419–439. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M. (2011). Language can mediate eye movement control within 100 milliseconds, regardless of whether there is anything to move the eyes to. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 190–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astheimer, L. B., & Sanders, L. D. (2009). Listeners modulate temporally selective attention during natural speech processing. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 23–34. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astheimer, L. B. & Sanders, L. D. (2011). Predictability affects early perceptual processing of word onsets in continuous speech. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3512–3516. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi:10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, M. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Bess, J., & Ruhm, H. (1972). Recovery cycle of the acoustically evoked potential. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 15, 507–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2002). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Software and manual Retrieved from http://www.praat.org.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., Salverda, A. P., Dilley, L. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). Expectations from preceding prosody influence segmentation in online sentence processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 1189–1196. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0167-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd, T. W., Barry, R. J., Gordon, E., Rennie, C., & Michie, P. T. (1998). Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: Habituation vs. refractoriness. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 31(1), 51–68. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(98)00040-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coch, D., Skendzel, W., & Neville, H. J. (2005). Auditory and visual refractory period effects in children and adults: An ERP study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 2184–2203. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R. A., & Jakimik, J. (1980). Segmenting speech into words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 1323–1332. doi:10.1121/1.384185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., &Titone, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 193–210. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunillera, T., Càmara, E., Toro, J. M., Marco-Pallares, J., Sebastián-Galles, N., Ortiz, H., … Rodríguez-Fornells, A. (2009). Time course and functional neuroanatomy of speech segmentation in adults. Neuroimage, 48, 541–553. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunillera, T., Gomila, A., & Rodríguez-Fornells, A. (2008). Beneficial effects of word final stress in segmenting a new language: Evidence from ERPs. BMC Neuroscience, 9(1), 23. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunillera, T., Toro, J. M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Rodríguez-Fornells, A. (2006). The effects of stress and statistical cues on continuous speech segmentation: An event-related brain potential study. Brain Research, 1123, 168–178. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. & Butterfield, S. (1992). Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 218–236. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90012-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(1), 113–121. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.14.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Diego Balaguer, R., Toro, J. M., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C., & Marcus, G. (2007). Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech. PLoS ONE, 2, e1175. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001175.t004
   Google Scholar
• Dilley, L. C., Mattys, S. L. & Vinke, L. (2010). Potent prosody: Comparing the effects of distal prosody, proximal prosody, and semantic context on word segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 274–294. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilley, L. C. & McAuley, J. D. (2008). Distal prosodic context affects word segmentation and lexical processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 294–311. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilley, L. C., & Pitt, M. A. (2010). Altering context speech rate can cause words to appear or disappear. Psychological Science, 21, 1664–1670. doi:10.1177/0956797610384743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 765–768. doi:10.1121/1.1908022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handel, S. (1989). Listening: An introduction to the perception of auditory events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. C., Dickstein, P. W., Berka, C., Hillyard, S. A. (1983). Event-related potentials during selective attention to speech sounds. Biological Psychology, 16, 211–224. doi:10.1016/0301-0511(83)90025-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillyard, S. A., Hink, R. F., Schwent, V. L., & Picton, T. W. (1973). Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science, 182, 177–180. doi:10.1126/science.182.4108.177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D., (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehiste, I. (1972). The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 2018–2024. doi:10.1121/1.1913062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 576–585. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matin, E., Shao, K. C., & Boff, K. R. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 372–380. doi:10.3758/BF03206780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys, S., Jusczyk, P., Luce, P., & Morgan, J. (1999). Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 465–494. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulines, E., & Charpentier, F. (1990). Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones. Speech Communication, 9, 453–467. doi:10.1016/0167-6393(90)90021-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R. &Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375–425. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakatani, L. H. &Dukes, K. D. (1977). Locus of segmental cues for word juncture. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 714–719. doi:10.1121/1.381583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1997). The possible word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 191–243. doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinisch, E., Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2011a). Speaking rate affects the perception of duration as a suprasegmental lexical-stress cue. Language and Speech, 54, 147–165. doi:10.1177/0023830910397489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinisch, E., Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2011b). Speaking rate from proximal and distal contexts is used during word segmentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 978–996. doi:10.1037/a0021923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928. doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2003). The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 90(1), 51–89. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00139-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., Crosswhite, K., Masharov, M., & McDonough, J. (2007). Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition. Cognition, 105, 466–476. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. D., Ameral, V., & Sayles, K. (2009). Event-related potentials index segmentation of nonsense sounds. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1183–1186. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. D., & Neville, H. (2003). An ERP study of continuous speech processing. I. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in native speakers. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 228–240. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00195-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanders, L. D., Newport, E. L., & Neville, H. J. (2002). Segmenting nonsense: An event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 700–703. doi:10.1038/nn873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, K. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of prosody and punctuation. Brain and Language, 86(1), 142–164. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00542-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroomen, J., & de Gelder, B. (1995). Metrical segmentation and lexical inhibition in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 98–108. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar