When the polar bear encounters many polar bears: event-related potential context effects evoked by uniqueness failure

References

• Abbott, B. (2010). References. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abusch, D. (2002). Lexical alternatives as a source of pragmatic presuppositions. In B. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT (vol. 12, pp. 1–19). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso-Ovalle, L., Menéndez-Benito, P., & Schwarz, F. (2009). Maximize presupposition and two types of definite competitors. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, Amherst, MA, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, G., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191–238. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(88)90020-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. E., & Holcomb, P. J. (2005). An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of coreference on word repetition and synonymy. Brain and Language, 94, 200–216. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentin, S. (1989). Electrophysiology of word perception, lexical organization and semantic priming: A tutorial review. Language & Speech, 32, 205–220. doi:10.1177/002383098903200302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 34–44. doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, P. (2006). Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 98, 159–168. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, P., & Roehm, D. (2007). Differential effects of saliency: An event-related brain potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 413, 115–120. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2006.11.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121. doi:10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146, 75–84. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felser, C., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. F. (2003). Storage and integration in the processing of filler-gap dependencies: An ERP study of topicalization and wh-movement in German. Brain and Language, 87, 345–354. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00135-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 250–272. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00004-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Processing local pragmatic anomalies in contexts: Evidence from the N400. Psychophysiology, 45, 554–558. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00656.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R., Sanford, A. J., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Processing pronouns without antecedents: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1315–1326. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenzel, S., Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2011). Conflicts in language processing: A new perspective on the N400-P600 distinction. Neuropsychologie, 49, 574–579. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (1997). The interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases: Time course, and effects of overspecificity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 1949–1962. doi:10.1080/713755687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1982). The mental representation of discourse in a focussed memory system: Implications for the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases. Journal of Semantics, 1, 21–41. doi:10.1093/jos/1.1.21
   Google Scholar
• Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468–484. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439–483. doi:10.1080/01690969308407585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512–521. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80003-4
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J. A. (1991). On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics, 27, 405–442. doi:10.1017/S0022226700012731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Heim, I. (1991). Artikel und Definitheit [Article and definiteness]. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Handbuch der Semantik [Handbook of semantics] (pp. 487–535). Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics and generative grammar. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003). Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 98–110. doi:10.1162/089892903321107855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadmon, N. (2001). Formal pragmatics. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Karttunen, L. (1973). Presupposition of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 169–193.
   Google Scholar
• King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 98–110. doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993). Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 196–214. doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H., & Chwilla, D. (2007). Late positivities in unusual situations. Brain and Language, 100, 257–261. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahmer, E. J. (1998). Presupposition and determinedness. In E. Krahmer (Ed.), Presupposition and anaphora (pp. 193–224). Stanford: CSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23–49. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Event-related brain potential (ERP) studies of sentence processing. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 385–406). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the Event-Related Brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205. doi:10.1126/science.7350657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1983). Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory & Cognition, 11, 539–550. doi:10.3758/BF03196991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., Van Petten, C., & Kluender, R. (2006). Psycholinguistic Electrified II: 1994–2005. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 659–724). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2003). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1979). Score-keeping in a language game. In R. Bauerle, U. Egli, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Semantics from different points of view (pp. 172–187). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Münte, T. F., Heinze, H.-J., Matzke, M., Wieringa, B.-M., & Johannes, S. (1998). Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: No evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychology, 36, 217–226. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00119-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2006a). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1098–1111. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2006b). Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs. Brain Research, 1118, 155–167. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2008). The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs. Brain and Language, 106, 119–131. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00196-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785–806. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90039-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolke, B., Heil, M., Streb, J., & Hennighausen, E. (2001). Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. Psychophysiology, 38, 165–174. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3820165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rösler, F., Friederici, A., Pütz, P., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 345–362. doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.3.345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, XIV, 479–493. doi:10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, M., Tiemann, S., Beck, S., Hertrich, I., & Rolke, B. (2012, February). Immediate processing of the uniqueness-Presupposition of the definite Noun Phrase: Evidence from word-by-word reading-time data. Poster presented at Linguistic Evidence 2012, Tübingen. Available from http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/en/research/core-research/collaborative-research-centers/sfb-833/ev/le2012/posters.html
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, P. B. (2009). Definiteness marking shows late effects during discourse processing: Evidence from ERPs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5847, 91–106. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04975-0_8
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 447–457. doi:10.1007/BF00262951
   Google Scholar
• St. George, M., Mannes, S., & Hoffman, J. E. (1994). Global semantic expectancy and language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 70–83. doi:10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiemann, S., Schmid, M., Bade, N., Rolke, B., Hertrich, I., Ackermann, H., Knapp, J., & Beck, S. (2011). Psycholinguistic evidence for presupposition: On-line and off-line Data. In I. Reich, E. Horch, & D. Pauly (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung (vol. 15, pp. 581–595). Saarbrücken: Universaar – Saarland University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2012). The electrophysiology of discourse and conversation. In M. J. Spivey, K. McRae, & M. F. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 589–614). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999). Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 147–182. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2003). Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40, 235–248. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 657–671. doi:10.1162/089892999563724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Koornneef, A. W., Otten, M., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2007). Establishing references in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective. Brain Research, 1146, 158–171. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwitserlood, P., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P., (2003). When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 701–718. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00196-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van de Meerendonk, N., Kolk, H. H. J., Vissers, C. T. W. M., & Chwilla, D. J. (2008). Monitoring in language perception: Mild and strong conflicts elicit different ERP patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 67–82. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Sandt, R. A. (1992). Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics, 9, 333–377. doi:10.1093/jos/9.4.333
   Google Scholar
• Van Herten, M., Kolk, H. H., & Chwilla, D. J. (2005). An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 241–255. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Von Fintel, K. (2004). Would you believe it? The king of France is back! (presuppositions and truth-value intuitions). In M. Reimer, & A. Bezuidenhout (Eds.), Descriptions and beyond (pp. 315–341). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1196–1207. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32, 25–64. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(89)90013-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar