712
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The neural computation of scalar implicature

, , &
Pages 620-634 | Received 19 Apr 2014, Accepted 22 Aug 2014, Published online: 24 Dec 2014

References

  • Bach, K. (1999). The semantics-pragmatics distinction: What it is and why it matters. In K. Turner (Ed.), The semantics-pragmatics interface from different points of view (pp. 65–84). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Barner, D. , & Bachrach, A. (2010). Inference and exact numerical representation in early language development. Cognitive Psychology , 60 , 40–62. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.06.002
  • Barner, D. , Brooks, N. , & Bale, A. (2010). Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition , 118 , 87–96. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.010
  • Bergen, L. , & Grodner, D. J. (2012). Speaker knowledge influences the comprehension of pragmatic inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 38 , 1450–1460.
  • Bonnefon, J.-F. , Feeney, A. , & Villejoubert, G. (2009). When some is actually all: Scalar inferences in face-threatening contexts. Cognition , 112 , 249–258. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.005
  • Bott, L. , Bailey, T. M. , & Grodner, D. J. (2012). Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures. Journal of Memory and Language , 66 , 123–142. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.09.005
  • Bott, L. , & Noveck, I. A. (2004). Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of memory and language , 51 , 437–457. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.006
  • Breheny, R. (2008). A new look at the semantics and pragmatics of numerically quantified noun phrases. Journal of Semantics , 25 , 93–139. doi:10.1093/jos/ffm016
  • Breheny, R. , Ferguson, H. J. , & Katsos, N. (2013). Investigating the timecourse of accessing conversational implicatures during incremental sentence interpretation. Language and Cognitive Processes , 28 , 443–467. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.649040
  • Breheny, R. , Ferguson, H. J. , & Katsos, N. (2013). Taking the epistemic step: Toward a model of on-line access to conversational implicatures. Cognition , 126 , 423–440. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.012
  • Breheny, R. , Katsos, N. , & Williams, J. (2006). Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition , 100 , 434–463. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.003
  • Chemla, E. , & Spector, B. (2011). Experimental evidence for embedded scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics , 28 , 359–400. doi:10.1093/jos/ffq023
  • Chevallier, C. , Noveck, I. A. , Nazir, T. , Bott, L. , Lanzetti, V. , & Sperber, D. (2008). Making disjunctions exclusive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 61 , 1741–1760. doi:10.1080/17470210701712960
  • Chevallier, C. , Wilson, D. , Happé, F. , & Noveck, I. A. (2010). Scalar inferences in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders , 40 , 1104–1117. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-0960-8
  • Chierchia, G. (2006). Broaden your views: Implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic Inquiry , 37 , 535–590. doi:10.1023/B:LING.0000023378.71748.db
  • Chierchia, G. , Crain, S. , Guasti, M. T. , Gualmini, A. , & Meroni, L. (2001). The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. In A. H.-J. Do , L. Domínguez , & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 157–168). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Chierchia, G. , Fox, D. , & Spector, B. (2012). Scalar implicature as a grammatical phenomenon. In C. Maienborn , K. von Reusinger , & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning III (pp. 2297–2331). Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Degen, J. (2013). Alternatives in pragmatic reasoning . ( Thesis). University of Rochester, Rochester.
  • DeLong, K. A. , Urbach, T. P. , Groppe, D. M. , & Kutas, M. (2011). Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations. Psychophysiology , 48 , 1203–1207. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01199.x
  • De Neys, W. , & Schaeken, W. (2007). When people are more logical under cognitive load. Experimental Psychology (formerly “Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie”), 54 , 128–133. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.54.2.128
  • Dieussaert, K. , Verkerk, S. , Gillard, E. , & Schaeken, W. (2011). Some effort for some: Further evidence that scalar implicatures are effortful. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 , 2352–2367.
  • Federmeier, K. D. , Wlotko, E. W. , De Ochoa-Dewald, E. , & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research , 1146 , 75–84. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101
  • Feeney, A. , Scrafton, S. , Duckworth, A. , & Handley, S. J. (2004). The story of some: Everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale , 58 , 121–132. doi:10.1037/h0085792
  • Foppolo, F. , Guasti, M. T. , & Chierchia, G. (2012). Scalar implicatures in child language: Give children a chance. Language Learning and Development , 8 , 365–394. doi:10.1080/15475441.2011.626386
  • Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition, and logical form . New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Geurts, B. (2009). Scalar implicature and local pragmatics. Mind & Language , 24 , 51–79. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.01353.x
  • Geurts, B. (2010). Quantity implicatures . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Geurts, B. , & Pouscoulous, N. (2009). Embedded implicatures?!? Semantics & Pragmatics , 2 , 1–34.
  • Goodman, N. D. , & Stuhlmüller, A. (2013). Knowledge and implicature: Modeling language understanding as social cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science , 5 , 173–184. doi:10.1111/tops.12007
  • Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Grodner, D. J. , Klein, N. M. , Carbary, K. M. , & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2010). “Some”, and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment. Cognition , 116 , 42–55. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.014
  • Hartshorne, J. K. , & Schachner, A. (2012). Tracking replicability as a method of post-publication open evaluation. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience , 6 . doi:10.3389/fncom.2012.00008
  • Hartshorne, J. K. , & Snedeker, J. (2014). The speed of inference: Evidence against rapid use of context in calculation of scalar implicature . Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Hirschberg, J. (1991). A theory of scalar implicature . New York, NY: Garland.
  • Horn, L. R. (1972, March). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English ( PhD Thesis). University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
  • Horn, L. R. (1989). Natural history of negation . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Horn, L. R. , & Wald, G. (2004). The handbook of pragmatics . Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Huang, Y. T. , & Snedeker, J. (2009a). Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognitive Psychology , 58 , 376–415. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.09.001
  • Huang, Y. T. , & Snedeker, J. (2009b). Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in 5-year-olds: Evidence from real-time spoken language comprehension. Developmental Psychology , 45 , 1723–1739. doi:10.1037/a0016704
  • Huang, Y. T. , & Snedeker, J. (2011). Logic and conversation revisited: Evidence for a division between semantic and pragmatic content in real-time language comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes , 26 , 1161–1172. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.508641
  • Huang, Y. , Spelke, E. , & Snedeker, J. (2013). What exactly do number words mean? Language Learning & Development , 9 , 105–129.
  • Katsos, N. (2008). The semantics/pragmatics interface from an experimental perspective: The case of scalar implicature. Synthese , 165 , 385–401. doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9187-4
  • Kounios, J. , & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Structure and process in semantic memory: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 121 , 459–479. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.459
  • Kutas, M. , & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology , 62 , 621–647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
  • Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Maris, E. , & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods , 164 , 177–190.
  • Marty, P. , Chemla, E. , & Spector, B. (2013). Interpreting numerals and scalar items under memory load. Lingua , 133 , 152–163. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2013.03.006
  • Mathworks . (2012, January 25). Signal processing toolbox: Users guide (2012a ). Retrieved from www.mathwords.com/help/signal
  • Moreno, E. M. , Federmeier, K. D. , & Kutas, M. (2002). Switching languages, switching palabras (words): An electrophysiological study of code switching. Brain and Language , 80 , 188–207. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2588
  • Morris, C. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science , 1 .
  • Nieuwland, M. S. , Ditman, T. , & Kuperberg, G. R. (2010). On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. Journal of Memory and Language , 63 , 324–346. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.005
  • Noveck, I. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition , 78 , 165–188. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00114-1
  • Noveck, I. A. , Chierchia, G. , Chevaux, F. , Guelminger, R. , & Sylvestre, E. (2002). Linguistic-pragmatic factors in interpreting disjunctions. Thinking and Reasoning , 8 , 297–326. doi:10.1080/13546780244000079
  • Noveck, I. A. , & Posada, A. (2003). Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language , 85 , 203–210. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00053-1
  • Noveck, I. A. , & Reboul, A. (2008). Experimental pragmatics: A Gricean turn in the study of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 12 , 425–431. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.009
  • Nuwer, M. R. , Comi, G. , Emerson, R. , Fuglsang-frederiksen, A. , Guérit, J.-M. , Hinrichs, H. , … Rappelsburger, P. (1998). IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology , 106 , 259–261. doi:10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00106-5
  • Open Science Collaboration . (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science , 7 , 657–660. doi:10.1177/1745691612462588
  • Panizza, D. , Chierchia, G. , & Clifton, C. (2009). On the role of entailment patterns and scalar implicatures in the processing of numerals. Journal of Memory and Language , 61 , 503–518. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.005
  • Papafragou, A. (2006). From scalar semantics to implicature: Children’s interpretation of aspectuals. Journal of Child Language , 33 , 721–757. doi:10.1017/S0305000906007550
  • Papafragou, A. , & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognition , 86 , 253–282. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00179-8
  • Papafragou, A. , & Tantalou, N. (2004). Children’s computation of implicatures. Language Acquisition , 12 , 71–82. doi:10.1207/s15327817la1201_3
  • Pashler, H. , & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science , 7 , 528–530. doi:10.1177/1745691612465253
  • Politzer-Ahles, S. , Fiorentino, R. , Jiang, X. , & Zhou, X. (2013). Distinct neural correlates for pragmatic and semantic meaning processing: An event-related potential investigation of scalar implicature processing using picture-sentence verification. Brain Research , 1490 , 134–52. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.10.042
  • Pouscoulous, N. , Noveck, I. A. , Politzer, G. , & Bastide, A. (2007). A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language Acquisition , 14 , 347–375. doi:10.1080/10489220701600457
  • Russell, B. (2006). Against grammatical computation of scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics , 23 , 361–382. doi:10.1093/jos/ffl008
  • Sauerland, U. (2004). Scalar implicatures in complex sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy , 27 , 367–391. doi:10.1023/B:LING.0000023378.71748.db
  • Sauerland, U. (2012). The computation of scalar implicatures: Pragmatic, lexical or grammatical? Language and Linguistics Compass , 6 , 36–49. doi:10.1002/lnc3.321
  • Semlitsch, H. V. , Anderer, P. , Schuster, P. , & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology , 23 , 695–703. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x
  • Vul, E. , Harris, C. , Winkielman, P. , & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science , 4 , 274–290.
  • Zevakhina, N. , & Geurts, B. (2014). Scalar diversity. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.