Production of plural nouns in German: evidence from non-fluent aphasia

References

• Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2013). Word position effects in apraxia of speech: Group data and individual variation. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 7–11. Retrieved from https://www.pluralpublishing.com/journals_JMSLP.htm
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 94–117. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Levelt, W. M. J., Schreuder, R., & Ernestus, M. (2007). Paradigmatic structure in speech production. In M. Elliott, J. Kirby, O. Sawada, E. Staraki, & S. Yoon (Eds.), Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (Vol. 43, pp. 1–29). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipovic Durdjevic, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118, 438–481. doi:10.1037/a0023851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Biedermann, B., Beyersmann, E., Mason, C., & Nickels, L. (2013). Does plural dominance play a role in spoken picture naming? A comparison of unimpaired and impaired speakers. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26, 712–736. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biedermann, B., Lorenz, A., Beyersmann, E., & Nickels, L. (2012). The influence of plural dominance in aphasic word production. Aphasiology, 26, 985–1004. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.660459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchert, F., De Bleser, R., & Sonntag, K. (2003). Does morphology make the difference? Agrammatic sentence comprehension in German. Brain and Language, 87, 323–342. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00132-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchert, F., Lorenz, A., Schröder, A., De Bleser, R., & Stadie, N. (2011). Sätze Verstehen: Neurolinguistische Materialien für die Untersuchung von syntaktischen Störungen beim Satzverständnis [To comprehend sentences: Neurolinguistic materials for the assessment of syntactic impairments in sentence comprehension]. Hofheim: NAT-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production Vol. 2: Development, writing and other language processes (pp. 257–294). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177–208. doi:10.1080/026432997381664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1990). Where do semantic errors come from? Cortex, 26(1), 95–122. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80077-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Rapp, B., & Miozzo, M. (2010). When do combinatorial mechanisms apply in the production of inflected words? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 334–359. doi:10.1080/02643294.2010.524467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 997–1060. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99002228
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A., & Marcus, G. F. (1992). Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition, 45, 225–255. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90018-D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E. J., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (vol. VI, pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Garthwaite, P. H. (2002). Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1196–1208. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00224-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bleser, R., Cholewa, J., Stadie, N., & Tabatabaie, S. (1997). LeMo, an expert system for single case asessment of word processing impairments in aphasic patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 7, 339–365. doi:10.1080/713755540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bleser, R., Cholewa, J., Stadie, N., & Tabatabaie, S. (2004). Lemo – Lexikon modell-orientiert, Einzelfalldiagnostik bei Aphasie, Dyslexie und Dysgraphie [Lemo – Lexicon model based, single-case assessments for aphasia, dyslexia, and dysgraphia]. München/Jena: Urban & Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and non-aphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801–838. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heister, J., Würzner, K.-M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hannefort, T., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R. (2011). dlex-DB- Eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung [dlex-DB- A lexical database for psychological and linguistic research]. Psychologische Rundschau, 62(1), 10–20. doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, R., & Best, W. (2010). The role of noun syntax in spoken word production: Evidence from aphasia. Cortex, 46, 329–342. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). Der Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (1998). Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1256–1274. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.5.1256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, A., Heide, J., & Burchert, F. (2014). Compound naming in aphasia: Effects of complexity, part of speech, and semantic transparency. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(1), 88–106. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.766357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, A., & Zwitserlood, P. (2014). Processing of nominal compounds and gender-marked determiners in aphasia: Evidence from German. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(1–2), 40–74. doi:10.1080/02643294.2013.874335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lütteken, L. (2011). Die Verarbeitung von Nominalkomposita bei Aphasie – Eine Einzelfallstudie zur Artikelverarbeitung und zum mündlichen Benennen [Processing of nominal compounds in aphasia – A single-case study] (Unpublished diploma thesis). Potsdam: Universität Potsdam.
   Google Scholar
• Luzzatti, C., Mondini, S., & Semenza, C. (2001). Lexical representation and processing of morphologically complex words: Evidence from the reading performance of an Italian agrammatic patient. Brain and Language, 79, 345–359. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. F. (1995). Children’s overregularization of English plurals: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Child Language, 22, 447–459. doi:10.1017/S0305000900009879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., Woest, A., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189–256. doi:10.1006/cogp.1995.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1997). Dissociating types of mental computation. Nature, 387, 592–594. doi:10.1038/42456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M. (2003). On the processing of regular and irregular forms of verbs and nouns: Evidence from neuropsychology. Cognition, 87(2), 101–127. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00200-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsella, E., & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 555–563. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. A. (2001). Words fail me: Symptoms and causes of naming breakdown in aphasia. In R. Berndt (Ed.), Handbook of neuropsychology (2nd ed. vol. 3, pp. 115–135). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., Biedermann, B., Fieder, N., & Schiller, N. O. (2015). The lexical-syntactic representation of number. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 287–304. doi:10.1080/23273798.2013.879191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, K., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). Deficits in irregular past-tense verb morphology associated with degraded semantic knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 39, 709–724. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00008-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penke, M., Janssen, U., & Krause, M. (1999). The representation of inflectional morphology: Evidence from Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 68, 225–232. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penke, M., & Krause, M. (2002). German noun plurals: A challenge to the dual mechanism model. Brain and Language, 81, 303–311. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1998). Words and rules. Lingua, 106, 219–242. doi:10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00035-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28(1–2), 73–193. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(88)90032-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1994). Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In S. D. Lima, R. L. Corrigan, & G. K. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 321–351). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48(1), 21–69. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90057-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2008). Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1580–1598. doi:10.1037/a0012476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Learning the past tenses of English verbs: Implicit rules or parallel distributed processing? In B. Mac Whinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 194–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modelling morphological processing. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., Rumiati, R. I., & Zadini, A. (2000).The selective impairment of the phonological output buffer. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 517–546. doi:10.1080/02643290050110638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Khader, P. H., Wiese, R., Zwitserlood, P., & Rösler, F. (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for the continuous processing of linguistic categories of regular and irregular verb inflection in German. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1284–1304. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(96)12442-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Zwitserlood, P., & Rösler, F. (2007). Stem access in regular and irregular inflection: Evidence from German participles. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 325–347. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenstuhl, I., Eisenbeiss, S., & Clahsen, H. (1999). Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition, 72, 203–236. Retrieved from www.elsevier.com/locate/cognit
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenstuhl, I., & Huth, A. (2002). Processing and representation of German – n plurals: A dual mechanism approach. Brain and Language, 81, 276–290. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1994). Interactive activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294. doi:10.1080/01690969408402120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(1), 37–69. doi:10.1023/A:1005204207369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., & Pinker, S. (1997). A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 266–276. doi:10.1006/brln.1996.0024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T., Pancheva, R., Love, T., Yee, E., Swinney, D., & Hickok, G. (2005). Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: Evidence from the production, reading and judgment of inflection in aphasia. Brain and Language, 93, 185–238. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vish-Brink, E., & Denes, G. (1992). Semantic association test: A modified version of the “pyramids and palm trees test”. Rotterdam: Academic Hospital.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, W. (2005). A nonlinear model of word-length effects in apraxia of speech. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 603–623. doi:10.1080/02643290442000211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar