Effects of online abstraction on adjective order preferences

References

• Adams, A. (1999). Caroline’s daughters. New York, NY: Washington Square Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, R. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, C. (1978). The order of premodifying adjectives in present-day English. Odense: Odense University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, C., & Davidsen-Nielsen, N. (1997). Mastering English: An advanced grammar for non-native and native speakers. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2005). Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems. In L. Gershkoff-Stowe & D. Rakison (Eds.), Building object categories (pp. 389–431). Mawjah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (R package version 1.1-7) [Software]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Berghmans, J. (1994). Wotan, een automatische grammatikale tagger voor het Nederlands [Wotan: An automatic grammatical tagger for Dutch]. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 26, 211–252.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273–297. doi:10.1007/BF00994018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cost, S., & Salzberg, S. (1993). A weighted nearest neighbor algorithm for learning with symbolic features. Machine Learning, 10, 57–78. doi:10.1007/BF00993481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daelemans, W., Zavrel, J., van den Bosch, A., & van der Sloot, K. (2003). MBT: Memory based tagger, version 2.0, reference guide (ILK Technical Report No. 03-13). Tilburg: Tilburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Daelemans, W., Zavrel, J., van der Sloot, K., & van den Bosch, A. (2010). TiMBL: Tilburg memory based learner, version 6.3, reference guide (ILK Technical Report No. 10-01). Tilburg: Tilburg University.
   Google Scholar
• den Boon, C. A., & Geeraerts, D. (Eds.). (2005). Van Dale Groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal [Van Dale's great dictionary of the Dutch language] (14th ed.). Utrecht: Van Dale Lexicografie.
   Google Scholar
• Diggle, P. J., & Ribeiro, Jr, P. J. (2007). Model-based geostatistics. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, R. M. W. (1982). Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Dudani, S. A. (1976). The distance-weighted k-nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 6, 325–327. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1976.5408784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernestus, M. T. C., & Baayen, R. H. (2003). Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language, 79, 5–38. doi:10.1353/lan.2003.0076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernestus, M., & Baayen, H. (2004). Analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch. Linguistics, 42, 873–903. doi:10.1515/ling.2004.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernestus, M., Baayen, R. H., van der Wouden, T., & Broekhuis, H. (2001). Choosing between the Dutch past-tense suffixes -te and -de. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 18, 77–88. doi:10.1075/avt.18.10ern
   Google Scholar
• Hay, J., & Bresnan, J. (2006). Spoken syntax: The phonetics of giving a hand in New Zealand English. The Linguistic Review [Special Issue on Exemplar-Based Models in Linguistics], 23, 321–349. doi:10.1515/TLR.2006.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetzron, R. (1978). On the relative order of adjectives. In H. Seiler (Ed.), Language universals. Papers from the Conference held at Gummersbach/Cologne, Germany, October 3–8, 1976 (pp. 165–184). Tübingen: Narr.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, D. (2000). Selective impairment of knowledge underlying prenominal adjective order: Evidence for the autonomy of grammatical semantics. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 13, 57–82. doi:10.1016/S0911-6044(99)00020-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, D., Tranel, D., & Zdanczyk, C. (2009). Knowledge of the semantic constraints on adjective order can be selectively impaired. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 91–108. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, D., Weber-Fox, C., Price, K., Zdanczyk, C., & Way, H. (2007). Big brown dog or brown big dog? An electrophysiological study of semantic constraints on prenominal adjective order. Brain and Language, 100, 238–256. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennison, S. M. (2010). Processing prenominal adjectives during sentence comprehension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 111, 141–157. doi:10.2466/11.22.28.PMS.111.4.141-157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E. (2007). Leanlex, lexical objects for Python™ (Version 0.6) [Software]. Retrieved from http://crr.ugent.be/programs-data/leanlex
   Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 643–650. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Sandra, D., Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., Durieux, G., & Martens, E. (2007). Dutch plural inflection: The exception that proves the analogy. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 283–318. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LimeSurvey Project Team, & Schmitz, C. (2011). LimeSurvey: An open source survey tool (Version 1.91+) [Software]. Retrieved from http://www.limesurvey.org
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D., Dimitriadou, E., Hornik, K., Weingessel, A., & Leisch, F. (2012). e1071: Misc functions of the Department of Statistics (e1071), TU Wien (R package version 1.6-1) [Software]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=e1071
   Google Scholar
• Ordelman, R., de Jong, F., van Hessen, A., & Hondorp, H. (2007). TwNC: A multifaceted Dutch news corpus. ELRA Newsletter, 12(3/4), 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In J. L. Bybee & P. J. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 137–157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (2013). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 456–463. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01990-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, Jr, P. J., & Diggle, P. J. (2001). geoR: A package for geostatistical analysis. R News, 1(2), 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, G.-J. (2002). Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of nominal phrases. In G. Cinque (Ed.), Functional structure in DP and IP (pp. 91–120). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snider, N. (2007, August). Exemplars in syntax: Evidence from priming in corpora. Paper presented at the ESSLLI 2007 Workshop on Exemplar-Based Models of Language Acquisition and Use, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Uit den Boogaart, P. C. (1975). Woordfrequenties in geschreven en gesproken Nederlands [Word frequencies in written and spoken Dutch]. Utrecht: Oosthoek, Scheltema & Holtema.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 37–69. doi:10.1023/A:1005204207369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bosch, A., Busser, G. J., Daelemans, W., & Canisius, S. (2007). An efficient memory-based morphosyntactic tagger and parser for Dutch. In P. Dirix, I. Schuurman, V. Vandeghinste, & F. Van Eynde (Eds.), Computational linguistics in the Netherlands 2006: Selected papers from the 17th CLIN meeting (pp. 99–114). Utrecht: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Vandekerckhove, B., Sandra, D., & Daelemans, W. (2013). Selective impairment of adjective order constraints as overeager abstraction: An elaboration on Kemmerer et al. (2009). Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26, 46–72. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, B. (1984). Classifying adjectives. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hoffmann, P. (2005). Recognising contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In R. J. Mooney (Ed.), Proceedings of the conference on human language technology and empirical methods in natural language processing – HLT’05 (pp. 347–354). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Wulff, S. (2003). A multifactorial corpus analysis of adjective order in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8, 245–282. doi:10.1075/ijcl.8.2.04wul
   Google Scholar