The cross-linguistic processing of aspect – an eyetracking study on the time course of aspectual interpretation in Russian and German

References

• Anderson, S. E., Matlock, T., Fausey, C. M., & Spivey, M. J. (2008). On the path to understanding the on-line processing of grammatical aspect. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2253–2258). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Anstatt, T. (2003). Aspekt, Argumente und Verbklassen im Russischen [Aspect, arguments and verbal classes in Russian]. (Unpublished habilitation). University of Tübingen.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, E. (1986). The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkenmaier, W. (1979). Artikelfunktionen in einer artikellosen Sprache [Determiner functions in languages without article] (No. 34). München: Fink.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, O. (2008). Doing it again and again may be difficult – but it depends on what you are doing. In N. Abner & J. Bishop (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 63–71). Los Angeles, CA: Cascadilla.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, O. (2010). The processing of events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, O. (2013). The processing domain of aspectual interpretation. In B. Arsenijevic, B. Gehrke, & R. Marn (Eds.), Subatomic semantics of event predicates (pp. 195–229). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, O., & Hamm, F. (2014). Cross-linguistic variation in the processing of aspect. In B. Hemforth, B. Schmiedtová, & C. Fabricius-Hansen (Eds.), Psycholinguistic approaches to meaning and understanding across languages(Vol. 44, pp. 83–109). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Braginsky, P., & Rothstein, S. (2008). Vendlerian classes and the Russian aspectual system. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 16(1), 3–55. doi:10.1353/jsl.0.0009
   Google Scholar
• Brecht, R. (1985). The form and function of aspect in Russian. In M. Flier & R. D. Brecht (Eds.), Issues in Russian morphosyntax (pp. 9–34). Columbus, OH: Slavica.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, J., & Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of aspectual coercion. Brain & Language, 106(2), 132–143. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breu, W. (2009). Verbale Kategorien: Aspekt und Aktionsart [Verbal categories: Aspect and Aktionsart]. In T. B. S. Kempgen, P. Kosta, & K. Gutschmidt (Eds.), Die slavischen Sprachen. Ein internationales Handbuch zu ihrer Struktur, ihrer Geschichte und ihrer Erforschung [The Slavic languages: An international handbook of their structure, their history and their investigation] (Vol. 32.1, pp. 209–225). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Carriedo, N., Alonso, M. A., & Fernández, A.(1997). The role of verb tense and verb aspect in the foregrounding of information during reading. Memory & Cognition, 25, 438–446. doi:10.3758/BF03201120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champollion, L. (2010). Parts of a whole: Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Champollion, L. (2013, May 3–5,). The scope and processing of for-adverbials: A reply to Deo and Piñango. In T. Snider (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 23) Conference. Santa Cruz: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, O. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121. doi:10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deo, A., & Pinango, M. M. (2011, May 20–22). Quantification and context in measure adverbs. In N. Ashton, A. Chereches, & D. Lutz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 21) Conference (pp. 295–312). New Jersey: Rutgers University in New Brunswick.
   Google Scholar
• Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Featherston, S. (2008). Thermometer judgments as linguistic evidence. In C. Riehl & A. Rothe (Eds.), Was ist linguistische Evidenz? [What is the nature of linguistic evidence?] (pp. 69–90). Aachen: Shaker.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti, T. R., Kutas, M., & McRae, K. (2007). Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 182–196. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filip, H. (1997). Integrating telicity, aspect and np semantics: The role of thematic structure. In J. Toman (Ed.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics (FASL) III. The College Park meeting 1994 (pp. 61–96). Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Michigan Slavic Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Filip, H. (2004). The telicity parameter revisited. In Semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) XIV (pp. 92–109). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Department of Linguistics, Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Filip, H. (2005). On accumulating and having it all: Perfectivity, prefixes and bare arguments. In H. Verkuyl, H. de Swart, & A. van Hout (Eds.), Perspectives on aspect(Vol. 32, pp. 125–148). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Filip, H. (2008). Events and maximalization. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect (pp. 217–256). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Filip, H., & Rothstein, S. (2005). Telicity as a semantic parameter. In J. Lavine, S. Franks, H. Filip, & M. Tasseva-Kurktchieva (Eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics (FASL) XIV. The Princeton University meeting (pp. 92–109). Ann Arbor, NY: University of Michigan Slavic Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Flecken, M., & Gerwien, J. (2013). Grammatical aspect influences duration estimation: Evidence from Dutch. In M. Knauff, N. Sebanz, M. Pauen, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of CogSci 2013(Vol. I, pp. 2309–2314). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance xii. The psychology of reading (pp. 559–586). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallestinova, E. D. (2007). Aspects of word order in Russian. ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y. (2008). Anticipatory processes in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 647–670. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00072.x
   Google Scholar
• Kipper Schuler, K. (2006). VerbNet: A broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, W. (1994). Time in language. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, W. (1995). A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language, 71, 669–695. doi:10.2307/415740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, W. (2009). How time is encoded. In W. Klein & P. Li (Eds.), The expression of time (pp. 39–82). Berlin and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Knoeferle, P., Crocker, M. W., Scheepers, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition, 95(1), 95–127. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krifka, M. (1989). Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, & Boas P. van Emde (Eds.), Semantics and contextual expression (pp. 75–115). Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Krifka, M. (1992). Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In I. A. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical matters (pp. 29–53). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Krifka, M. (1998). The origins of telicity. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar (pp. 197–237). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice theoretical approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use, and the interpretation of language(pp. 302–323). Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, C. J., & Ferretti, T. R. (2009). Verb aspect and the mental representation of situations. In W. Klein & P. Li (Eds.), The expression of time (pp. 217–240). Berlin and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, C. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2003). How does verb aspect constrain event representations? Memory & Cognition, 31, 663–672. doi:10.3758/BF03196106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. (1973). Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature, 244, 522–523. doi:10.1038/244522a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1975). Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science, 189, 226–228. doi:10.1126/science.189.4198.226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo, N., Corley, M., & Keller, F. (2006). Webexp2: Experimenter's manual. Retrieved from http://www.webexp.info/
   Google Scholar
• Paducheva, E. (1996). Semantičeskie issledovanija [Semantic Researches]. Moskow: Jazyky Russkoj Kultury.
   Google Scholar
• Paducheva, E. (2009). Leksičeskaja aspektual'nost' i klassifikacija predikatov po maslovu-vendleru [Lexical and aspectual classification of predicates in terms of Maslov and Vendler]. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 6, 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Paslawska, A., & von Stechow, A. (2003). Perfect readings in Russian. In A. Alexiadou, M. Rathert, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Perfect explorations(pp. 307–362). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, L., Brennan, J., & Bemis, D. (2011). Grounding the cognitive neuroscience of semantics in linguistic theory. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1317–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Balota, D. A., & Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 40, 473–483. doi:10.1037/h0080111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (1997). The parameter of aspect(2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Steedman, M. (1997). Temporality. In J. van Benthem & T. Meulen (Eds.), Handbook of logic and language(pp. 895–935). London, Burlington, MA: Elsevier North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• van Geenhoven, V.(2004). For-adverbials, frequentative aspect, and pluractionality. Natural Language Semantics, 12, 135–190. doi:10.1023/B:NALS.0000031389.36427.af
   Google Scholar
• Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66, 143–160. doi:10.2307/2182371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkuyl, H. (1972). On the compositional nature of the aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Verkuyl, H. (2005). Aspectual composition: Surveying the ingredients. In H. Verkuyl, H. de Swart, & A. van Hout (Eds.), Perspectives on aspect(pp. 19–41). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• von Stutterheim, C., Andermann, M., Carroll, M., Flecken, M., & Schmiedtová, B. (2012). How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: Insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data, and memory performance. Linguistics, 50, 833–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Stutterheim, C., Carroll, M., & Klein, W. (2009). New perspectives in analyzing aspectual distinctions across languages. In W. Klein & P. Li (Eds.), The expression of time (pp. 195–216). Berlin and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (1967). On the semantics of the verbal aspect in Polish. In To honor Roman Jacobson – Essays on the occasion of his seventieth birthday (pp. 2231–2249). The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar