Making sense: motor activation and action plausibility during sentence processing

References

• Amsel, B. D. (2011). Tracking real-time neural activation of conceptual knowledge using single-trial event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 970–983. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsel, B. D., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2013). Alive and grasping: Stable and rapid semantic access to an object category but not object graspability. NeuroImage, 77, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aravena, P., Courson, M., Frak, V., Cheylus, A., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., & Nazir, T. A. (2014). Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 163. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S. M., Rizzolatti, G., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology, 16(18), 1818–1823. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99532147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M. C., & Brunia, C. H. (2001). Anticipatory attention: An event-related desynchronization approach. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 43(1), 91–107. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(01)00181-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied cognition and beyond: Acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 763–773. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19(8), 1905–1914. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulenger, V., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A. (2006). Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1607–1615. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127–143. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelle, B., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2010). Heating up or cooling up the brain? MEG evidence that phrasal verbs are lexical units. Brain and Language, 115(3), 189–201. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, S. (2006). Constructing meaning. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(4), 245–266. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms2104_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dam, W. O., van Dijk, M., Bekkering, H., & Rueschemeyer, S.-A. (2012). Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations. Human Brain Mapping, 33(10), 2322–2333. doi:10.1002/hbm.21365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dam, W. O., Rueschemeyer, S.-A., & Bekkering, H. (2010). How specifically are action verbs represented in the neural motor system: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 53(4), 1318–1325. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, D., Dynowska, A., Ritter, W., & Grose-Fifer, J. (2004). Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: Implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. Psychophysiology, 41(1), 60–74. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., Zwaan, R. A., & Bekkering, H. (2010). The functional role of motor activation in language processing: Motor cortical oscillations support lexical-semantic retrieval. NeuroImage, 50(2), 665–677. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Laszlo, S. (2009). Time for meaning: Electrophysiology provides insights into the dynamics of representation and processing in semantic memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 1–44. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51001-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825–850. doi:10.1080/17470210701623605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenzel, S., Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2011). Conflicts in language processing: A new perspective on the N400–P600 distinction. Neuropsychologia, 49(3), 574–579. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479. doi:10.1080/02643290442000310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. doi:10.3758/BF03196313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Baggio, G., & Willems, R. M. (2009). Semantic unification. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (4th ed., pp. 819–836). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 273–316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hari, R. (2006). Action–perception connection and the cortical mu rhythm. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 253–260. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)59017-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., & Tschentscher, N. (2013). The body of evidence: What can neuroscience tell us about embodied semantics? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 50. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig, K., Sim, E. J., Bochev, V., Herrnberger, B., & Kiefer, M. (2008). Conceptual flexibility in the human brain: Dynamic recruitment of semantic maps from visual, motor, and motion-related areas. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(10), 1799–1814. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, D., & Gonzalez-Castillo, J. (2010). The two-level theory of verb meaning: An approach to integrating the semantics of action with the mirror neuron system. Brain and Language, 112(1), 54–76. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48(7), 805–825. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P., Hanslmayr, S., Gruber, W., & Freunberger, R. (2007). Event-related phase reorganization may explain evoked neural dynamics. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 31(7), 1003–1016. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. doi:10.1126/science.7350657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163. doi:10.1038/307161a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933. doi:10.1038/nrn2532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M., Hutchinson, S., Tillman, R., & Recchia, G. (2015). Effect size matters: The role of language statistics and perceptual simulation in conceptual processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(4), 430–447. doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.981552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z. (2015). What is embodied about cognition? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(4), 420–429. doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.987791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1), 59–70. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, B. F., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., & Riggio, L. (2012). Language sensorimotor specificity modulates the motor system. Cortex, 48(7), 849–856. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177–190. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meteyard, L., Rodriguez Cuadrado, S., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48(7), 788–804. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, C. L., & Gennari, S. P. (2010). Effects of implied physical effort in sensory-motor and pre-frontal cortex during language comprehension. NeuroImage, 49(1), 782–793. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, I., de Vega, M., & León, I. (2013). Understanding action language modulates oscillatory mu and beta rhythms in the same way as observing actions. Brain and Cognition, 82(3), 236–242. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, I., de Vega, M., León, I., Bastiaansen, M., Lewis, A. G., & Magyari, L. (2015). Brain dynamics in the comprehension of action-related language. A time-frequency analysis of mu rhythms. NeuroImage, 109, 50–62. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuper, C., Wörtz, M., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2006). ERD/ERS patterns reflecting sensorimotor activation and deactivation. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 211–222. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)59014-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1098–1111. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J. M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, article no. 1. doi: 10.1155/2011/156869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfurtscheller, G., & Neuper, C. (2001). Motor imagery and direct brain–computer communication. Proceedings of the IEEE, 89(7), 1123–1134. doi:10.1109/5.939829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineda, J. A. (2005). The functional significance of mu rhythms: Translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing”. Brain Research Reviews, 50(1), 57–68. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain’s language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 253–279. doi:10.1017/S0140525X9900182X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F. (2002). The neuroscience of language: On brain circuits of words and serial order. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Meaning and the brain: The neurosemantics of referential, interactive, and combinatorial knowledge. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25(5), 423–459. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., & Fadiga, L. (2010). Active perception: Sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(5), 351–360. doi:10.1038/nrn2811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Härle, M., & Hummel, F. (2001). Walking or talking?: Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain and Language, 78(2), 143–168. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2009). Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 388–396. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Brass, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2007). Comprehending prehending: Neural correlates of processing verbs with motor stems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 855–865. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salenius, S., Schnitzler, A., Salmelin, R., Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R. (1997). Modulation of human cortical rolandic rhythms during natural sensorimotor tasks. NeuroImage, 5(3), 221–228. doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmelin, R., & Hari, R. (1994). Characterization of spontaneous MEG rhythms in healthy adults. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 91(4), 237–248. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(94)90187-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simmons, W. K., Ramjee, V., Beauchamp, M. S., McRae, K., Martin, A., & Barsalou, L. W. (2007). A common neural substrate for perceiving and knowing about color. Neuropsychologia, 45(12), 2802–2810. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., … Perani, D. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(2), 273–281. doi:10.1162/0898929053124965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukovic, N., & Shtyrov, Y. (2014). Cortical motor systems are involved in second-language comprehension: Evidence from rapid mu-rhythm desynchronisation. NeuroImage, 102, 695–703. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, R. M., & Casasanto, D. (2011). Flexibility in embodied language understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 116. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, R. M., Labruna, L., D’Esposito, M., Ivry, R., & Casasanto, D. (2011). A functional role for the motor system in language understanding: Evidence from theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation. Psychological Science, 22(7), 849–854. doi:10.1177/0956797611412387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (2003). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 35–62. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(03)44002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2004). Updating situation models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 283–288. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar