Talking out of order: task order and retrieval of grammatical gender and phonology in lexical access

References

• Abdel Rahman, R., & Sommer, W. (2003). Does phonological encoding in speech production always follow the retrieval of semantic knowledge? Electrophysiological evidence for parallel processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 16(3), 372–382. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00305-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abdel Rahman, R., Sommer, W., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2002). Brain-potential evidence for the time course of access to biographical facts and names of familiar persons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(2), 366–373. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.2.366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel Rahman, R., Van Turennout, M., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Phonological encoding is not contingent on semantic feature retrieval: An electrophysiological study on object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 850–860. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustin, M. D., Defranceschi, B., Fuchs, H. K., Carbon, C.-C., & Hutzler, F. (2011). The neural time course of art perception: An ERP study on the processing of style versus content in art. Neuropsychologia, 49(7), 2071–2081. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Vasishth, S., Bates, D., & Kliegl, R. (2015). Out of the cage of shadows. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Kiegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (R. package version 1.1-9) [software package]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., D’Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Székely, A., Andonova, E., Devescovi, A., … & Tzeng, O. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(2), 344–380. doi:10.3758/BF03196494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Federmeier, K., Herron, D., Iyer, G., Jacobsen, T., Pechman, T., … & Pléh, C. (2000). Introducing the CRL International Picture-Naming Project (CRL-IPNP). Center for Research in Language Newsletter, 12(1). Retrieved from http://crl.ucsd.edu/bates/papers/pdf/from-meiti/11-Picnorm.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. (1989). Lexical access in speech production. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 108–135). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camen, C., Morand, S., & Laganaro, M. (2010). Re-evaluating the time course of gender and phonological encoding during silent monitoring tasks estimated by ERP: Serial or parallel processing? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(1), 35–49. doi:10.1007/s10936-009-9124-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208. doi:10.1080/026432997381664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). Eeglab: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1999). Erp components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 101(2), 267–291. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00008-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 152–170. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Speech and talk (Vol. 1, pp. 177–200). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, W. R., & Düngelhoff, F. J. (1984). The time course of picture word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 640–654. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2007). A model of the go/no-go task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 389–413. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, T., & Peng, D. (2007). Speaking words in the second language: From semantics to phonology in 170 ms. Neuroscience Research, 57(3), 387–392. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2006.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, T. M., Peng, D. L., Lu, C. M., & Liu, H. Y. (2005). The temporal course of semantic and phonological activation in Chinese word production: An ERP study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37(5), 569–574. Retrieved from http://118.145.16.229:81/Jweb_xlxb/EN/Y2005/V37/I05/569
   Google Scholar
• Hanulová, J., Davidson, D. J., & Indefrey, P. (2011). Where does the delay in L2 picture naming come from? Psycholinguistic and neurocognitive evidence on second language word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(7), 902–934. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.509946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, F. E. J. (2001). Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Heister, J., Würzner, K.-M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hanneforth, T., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Dlexdb – eine lexicalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung [dlexDB – a lexical database for psychological and linguistic research]. Psychologische Rundschau, 62, 10–20. doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoversten, L. J., Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2015). Language membership identification precedes semantic access: Suppression during bilingual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(11), 2108–2116. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(225). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1-2), 101–144. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), 696–701. doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, H. H. (1958). Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography: 1957. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 370–375. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(58)90053-1
   Google Scholar
• Kiesel, A., Miller, J., Jolicoeur, P., & Brisson, B. (2008). Measurement of ERP latency differences: A comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. Psychophysiology, 45(2), 250–274. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00618.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornhuber, H. H., & Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschafts-Potential und reafferente Potentiale [ Brain potential changes associated with voluntary and passive movements in humans: Readiness potential and reafferent potentials]. Pflügers Archive für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 284(4), 1–17. doi:10.1007/BF00412364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Donchin, E. (1974). Studies of squeezing: Handedness, responding hand, response force, and asymmetry of readiness potential. Science, 186(4163), 545–548. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1739573 doi: 10.1126/science.186.4163.545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Donchin, E. (1980). Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 202(1), 95–115. doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(80)80037-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M. A. (2013). ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments. (R package version 4.2-2) [software package]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ez
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Zhong, W., Chen, Q., & Mo, L. (2013). Object detection is completed earlier than object categorization: Evidence from LRP and N200. Psychophysiology, 50(12), 1255–1262. doi:10.1111/psyp.12131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). Erplab: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(4), 213. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, U., Leuthold, H., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2010a). On the temporal organization of facial identity and expression analysis: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(4), 505–522. doi:10.3758/CABN.10.4.505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, U., Leuthold, H., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2010b). Parallel processing in face perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(1), 103–121. doi:10.1037/a0017167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. O., Patterson, T., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35(1), 99–115. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0048577298960851 doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3510099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, O., & Hagoort, P. (2006). Access to lexical information in language comprehension: Semantics before syntax. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(1), 84–96. doi:10.1162/089892906775249997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munding, D., Dubarry, A.-S., & Alario, F.-X. (2016). On the cortical dynamics of word production: A review of the MEG evidence. Language Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(4), 441–462. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1071857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, M. M., Brunet, D., & Michel, C. (2008). Topographic ERP analyses: A step-by-step tutorial review. Brain Topography, 20(4), 249–269. doi:10.1007/s10548-008-0054-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). doi:10.1126/science.aac4716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perception Research Systems. (2007). Paradigm stimulus presentation (Version 2.3.0.29) [computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.paradigmexperiments.com
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (Version 3.2.2) [computer software]. Vienna. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Schmitt, B. M., Kutas, M., & Münte, T. F. (2002). Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during listening and naming. Neuropsychologia, 40(7), 778–787. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00188-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, B. M., Münte, T. F., & Kutas, M. (2000). Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during implicit picture naming. Psychophysiology, 37(4), 473–484. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3740473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, B. M., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Kutas, M., & Münte, T. F. (2001). Electrophsyiological estimates of semantic and syntactic information access during tacit picture naming and listening to words. Neuroscience Research, 41(3), 293–298. doi:10.1016/S0168-0102(01)00286-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, B. M., Schiltz, K., Zaake, W., Kutas, M., & Münte, T. F. (2001). An electrophysiological analysis of the time course of conceptual and syntactic encoding during tacit picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(4), 510–522. doi:10.1162/08989290152001925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(4), 841–850. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Meyer, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11). doi:10.1177/0956797611417632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 143–186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2016). The cortical dynamics of speaking: Present shortcomings and future avenues. Language Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(4), 484–503. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1120878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K., Holcomb, P., & Costa, A. (2011). Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 345–362. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K., Yum, Y. N., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. (2011). Early goal-directed top-down influences in the production of speech. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(371). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Székely, A., Jacobsen, T., D’Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Andonova, E., Herron, D., … & Bates, E. (2004). A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 247–250. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2001). Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuing LRP onset effects in factorial designs. Psychophysiology, 38(5), 817–827. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0048577201000610 doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3850816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Casteren, M., & Davis, M. H. (2007). Match: A program to assist in matching the conditions of factorial experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 973–978. doi:10.3758/BF03192992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rij, J., Wieling, M., Baayen, R., & Van Rijn, H. (2015). itsadug: Interpreting time series and autocorrecting data using GAMMs. (R package version 1.0.1) [software package]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=itsadug
   Google Scholar
• Van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M. (1997). Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 787–806. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1998). Brain activity during speaking: From syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. Science, 280(5363), 572–574. doi:10.1126/science.280.5363.572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). The time course of grammatical and phonological processing during speaking: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(6), 649–676. doi:10.1023/A:1023221028150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalized additive models. An introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapmans and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N. (2011). Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 73(1), 3–36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Damian, M. F. (2009). The time course of semantic and orthographic encoding in Chinese word production: An event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1273, 92–105. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Damian, M. F., & Yang, Y. (2007). Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of tonal and orthographic encoding in Chinese speech production. Brain Research, 1184, 234–244. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Yang, Y. (2007). Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and metrical encoding in Chinese speech production. Neuroscience, 147(4), 986–995. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar