Learning new meanings for known words: biphasic effects of prior knowledge

References

• Adlof, S., Frishkoff, G., Dandy, J., & Perfetti, C. (2016). Effects of induced orthographic and semantic knowledge on subsequent learning: A test of the partial knowledge hypothesis. Reading and Writing, 29(3), 475–500. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9612-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2005). Interfering neighbours: The impact of novel word learning on the identification of visually similar words. Cognition, 97(3), B45–B54. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. D., & Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 208–216. doi: 10.3758/BF03197718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2013). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, F., Vu, M., Chan, D. H., Lawrence, J. M., Harris, L. N., Guan, Q., … Perfetti, C. A. (2013). Writing affects the brain network of reading in Chinese: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Human Brain Mapping, 34(7), 1670–1684. doi:10.1002/hbm.22017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casenhiser, D. M. (2005). Children’s resistance to homonymy: An experimental study of pseudohomonyms. Journal of Child Language, 32(2), 319–343. doi: 10.1017/S0305000904006749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2003). Event-related potential and reaction time evidence for inhibition between alternative meanings of ambiguous words. Brain and Language, 86(2), 167–192. doi:10.1016/S0093-934x(02)00527-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutanche, M. N., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2014). Fast mapping rapidly integrates information into existing memory networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 143(6), 2296–2303. doi:10.1037/xge0000020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H., & Gaskell, M. G. (2009). A complementary systems account of word learning: Neural and behavioural evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3773–3800. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, M. J. (2004). Children’s difficulty in learning homonyms. Journal of Child Language, 31(1), 203–214. doi: 10.1017/S030500090300583X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, M. G., & Dumay, N. (2003). Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words. Cognition, 89(2), 105–132. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00070-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, M. G., & Ellis, A. W. (2009). Word learning and lexical development across the lifespan. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3607–3615. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(2), 256–281. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.113.2.256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf Estes, K., Evans, J. L., Alibali, M. W., & Saffran, J. R. (2007). Can infants map meaning to newly segmented words? Statistical segmentation and word learning. Psychological Science, 18(3), 254–260. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01885.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, W. W., Grabowski, T. J., Mehta, S., & Gordon, J. K. (2007). A neural signature of phonological access: Distinguishing the effects of word frequency from familiarity and length in overt picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(4), 617–631. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, J. F., Pelucchi, B., Graf Estes, K., & Saffran, J. R. (2011). Linking sounds to meanings: Infant statistical learning in a natural language. Cognitive Psychology, 63(2), 93–106. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joordens, S., & Besner, D. (1994). When banking on meaning is not (yet) money in the bank: Explorations in connectionist modeling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1051–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., Farrar, W. T., & Kello, C. T. (1994). When two meanings are better than one: Modeling the ambiguity advantage using a recurrent distributed network. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(6), 1233–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.104.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S., & Gaskell, M. G. (2013). Lexical integration of novel words without sleep. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 608–622. doi:10.1037/a0029243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence-intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(4), 476–490. doi:10.3758/Bf03210951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzocco, M. M. (1997). Children’s interpretations of homonyms: A developmental study. Journal of Child Language, 24(2), 441–467. doi: 10.1017/S0305000997003103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O’Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning-systems in the hippocampus and neocortex – insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102(3), 419–457. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K. (2012). Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning. Psychological Review, 119(4), 831–877. doi:10.1037/a0029872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mestres-Misse, A., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Munte, T. F. (2007). Watching the brain during meaning acquisition. Cerebral Cortex, 17(8), 1858–1866. doi: bhl094 [pii]10.1093/cercor/bhl094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R., Ray, J., & Bland, S. (1998). Wordsmyth English dictionary – thesaurus. University of Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.wordsmyth.net
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. doi: 10.1080/10888430701530730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Wlotko, E. W., & Hart, L. A. (2005). Word learning and individual differences in word learning reflected in event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1281–1292. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao, X., & Forster, K. I. (2013). Novel word lexicalization and the prime lexicality effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1064–1074. doi:10.1037/a0030528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Morphology in word identification: A word-experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 219–237. doi:10.1207/S1532799xssr0703_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 245–266. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodd, J. M., Berriman, R., Landau, M., Lee, T., Ho, C., Gaskell, M. G., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Learning new meanings for old words: Effects of semantic relatedness. Memory and Cognition, 40(7), 1095–1108. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0209-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words. Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 367–379. doi: 10.3758/BF03197126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, G. B. (1981). Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(1), 120–136. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90356-X
   Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L., Armbruster, J., & Hogan, T. P. (2006). Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 49(6), 1175–1192. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/085)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L., & Maekawa, J. (2005). A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: The role of phonotactic probability and word frequency. Journal of Child Language, 32(4), 827–853. doi: 10.1017/S0305000905007099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L., Maekawa, J., & Aschenbrenner, A. J. (2013). The effect of homonymy on learning correctly articulated versus misarticulated words. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 56(2), 694–707. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0122)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamminen, J., & Gaskell, M. G. (2013). Novel word integration in the mental lexicon: Evidence from unmasked and masked semantic priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(5), 1001–1025. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.724694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, B. J. (1957). Interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 64(1), 49–60. doi: 10.1037/h0044616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, B. J., & Freund, J. S. (1968). Effect of temporal separation of two tasks on proactive inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78(1), 50–54. doi: 10.1037/h0026157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar