The role of embodiment in conceptual development

References

• Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 578–602. doi:10.3758/BF03200738
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews, M., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). The Hidden Markov topic model: A probabilistic model of semantic representation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 101–113. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01074.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D. (2009). Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review, 116, 463–498. doi:10.1037/a0016261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonucci, S. M., & Alt, M. (2011). A lifespan perspective on semantic processing of concrete concepts: Does a sensory/motor model have the potential to bridge the gap? Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 551–572. doi:10.3758/s13415-011-0053-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 129–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511499968
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., Yeh, W., Luka, B. J., Olseth, K. L., Mix, K., & Wu, L.-L. (1993). Concepts and meaning. In K. Beals, G. Cooke, D. Kathman, K. E. McCullough, S. Kita, & D. Testen (Eds.), Chicago linguistics society 29: Papers from the para sessions on conceptual representations (Vols. 2, pp. 23–62). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Cimatti, F., Marocco, D., & Scorolli, C. (2011). Manipulating objects and telling words: A study on concrete and abstract word acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (1998). Magic words: How language augments human computation. In P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (Eds.), Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes (pp. 162–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511597909
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/mind/fzq002
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Coulson, S. (2011). Modality switching in a property verification task: An ERP study of what happens when candles flicker and high heels click. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2013). Flexible and fast: Linguistic shortcut affects both shallow and deep conceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 542–550. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0368-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2014). I see/hear what you mean: Semantic activation depends on perceptual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 527–533. doi:10.1037/a0034626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (2005). Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain, 128, 615–627. doi:10.1093/brain/awh349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dove, G. (2011). On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dove, G. (2014). Thinking in words: Language as an embodied medium of thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 371–389. doi:10.1111/tops.12102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dove, G. (2016). Three symbol ungrounding problems: Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1109–1121. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0825-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausey, C. M., Jayaraman, S., & Smith, L. B. (2016). From faces to hands: Changing visual input in the first two years. Cognition, 152, 101–107. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479. doi:10.1080/02643290442000310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2006). Embodiment in cognitive science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805844
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M. (2015). Few believe the world is flat: How embodiment is changing the scientific understanding of cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 165–171. doi:10.1037/cep0000056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48, 905–922. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., Goldberg, A., & Zhu, X. (2009). Improving early reading comprehension using embodied CAI. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9096-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 424–436. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A., Willford, J., Gibson, B., Goldberg, A., & Zhu, X. (2012). Improving reading to improve math. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 316–340. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.564245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hald, L. A., van den Hurk, M., & Bekkering, H. (2015). Learning verbs more effectively through meaning congruent action. Learning and Instruction, 39, 107–122. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, D., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2012). The influence of print exposure on the body-object interaction effect in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, I. S., Leonard, G. A., Pexman, P. M., Pittman, D. J., Siakaluk, P. D., & Goodyear, B. G. (2012). The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, I. S., & Pexman, P. M. (2012). Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, I. S., & Pexman, P. M. (2014). Get rich quick: The signal to respond procedure reveals the time course of semantic richness effects during visual word recognition. Cognition, 131, 216–242. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston-Price, C., Plunkett, K., & Harris, P. (2005). ‘Word-learning wizardry’ at 1;6. Journal of Child Language, 32, 175–189. doi:10.1017/S0305000904006610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, S. R., Jankowicz, D., & Becker, S. (2005). A model of grounded language acquisition: Sensorimotor features improve lexical and grammatical learning. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 258–276. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, J., Smiley, P., & Charney, R. (1983). Emergence of action categories in the child: Evidence from verb meanings. Psychological Review, 90, 72–93. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.90.1.72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkster, M., Wellsby, M., Lloyd, E., & Pexman, P. M. (2016). Development of embodied word meanings: Sensorimotor effects in children’s lexical processing. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, K. H., & Maouene, J. (2009). Auditory verb perception recruits motor systems in the developing brain: An fMRI investigation. Developmental Science, 12, F26–F34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00919.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, K. H., & Swain, S. N. (2011). Only self-generated actions create sensori-motor systems in the developing brain. Developmental Science, 14, 673–678. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01011.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalénine, S., & Bonthoux, F. (2008). Object manipulability affects children’s and adults’ conceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 667–672. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.3.667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasik, L. B., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Adolph, K. E. (2011). Transition from crawling to walking and infants’ actions with objects and people. Child Development, 82, 1199–1209. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01595.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontra, C., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Embodied learning across the life span. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 731–739. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01221.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 14–34. doi:10.1037/a0021446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2012). Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 773–785. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic space from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–208. doi:10.3758/BF03204766
   Google Scholar
• Lupyan, G., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L. (2007). Language is not just for talking: Redundant labels facilitate learning of novel categories. Psychological Science, 18, 1077–1083. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02028.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z. (2015). The burden of embodied cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 172–178. doi:10.1037/cep0000060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 102, 59–70. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maouene, J., Hidaka, S., & Smith, L. B. (2008). Body parts and early-learned words. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32, 1200–1216. doi:10.1080/03640210802019997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, P. J. (2016). Embodiment and human development. Child Development Perspectives, 10, 245–250. doi:10.1111/cdep.12190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meteyard, L., Rodriguez Cuadrado, S., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48, 788–804. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffat, M., Siakaluk, P. D., Sidhu, D., & Pexman, P. M. (2015). Situated conceptualization and semantic processing: Effects of emotional experience and context availability in semantic categorization and naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 408–419. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0696-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mounoud, P., Duscherer, K., Moy, G., & Perraudin, S. (2007). The influence of action perception on object recognition: A developmental study. Developmental Science, 10, 836–852. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00624.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L. (1996). On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 60, 173–204. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, P. I., Campbell, C., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2012). Effects of emotional and sensorimotor knowledge in semantic processing of concrete and abstract nouns. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1976). Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19, 113–126. doi:10.1145/360018.360022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255–287. doi:10.1037/h0084295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecher, D., Boot, I., & Van Dantzig, S. (2011). Abstract concepts: Sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 54, 217–248. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, A. F., Smith, L. B., & Yu, C. (2014). A bottom-up view of toddler word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 178–185. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0466-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, I. S., Siakaluk, P. D., Bodner, G. E., & Pope, J. (2008). There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 161–167. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.1.161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. I., Sears, C. R., & Pexman, P. M. (2012). An embodied semantic processing effect on eye gaze during sentence reading. Language & Cognition, 4, 99–114. doi:10.1515/langcog-2012-0006
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International University Press. doi:10.1037/11494-000
   Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1985). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science (2nd ed.). London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Recchia, G., & Jones, M. N. (2012). The semantic richness of abstract concepts. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, A. L., Van Kleeck, A., Maguire, M. J., & Abdi, H. (2016). Do acting out verbs with doll and comparison learning between scenes boost toddlers’ verb comprehension? Journal of Child Language. doi:10.1017/S0305000916000076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siakaluk, P. D., Knol, N., & Pexman, P. M. (2014). Effects of emotional experience for abstract words in the Stroop task. Cognitive Science, 38, 1698–1717. doi:10.1111/cogs.12137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Aguilera, L., Owen, W. J., & Sears, C. R. (2008). Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body-object interaction effect. Cognition, 106, 433–443. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Sears, C. R., Wilson, K., Locheed, K., & Owen, W. J. (2008). The benefits of sensorimotor knowledge: Body-object interaction facilitates semantic processing. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32, 591–605. doi:10.1080/03640210802035399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidhu, D. M., Heard, A., & Pexman, P. M. (2016). Is more always better for verbs? Semantic richness effects and verb meaning. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidhu, D. M., Kwan, R., Pexman, P. M., & Siakaluk, P. D. (2014). Effects of relative embodiment in lexical and semantic processing of verbs. Acta Psychologica, 149, 32–39. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B. (2005). Action alters shape categories. Cognitive Science, 29, 665–679. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B. (2013). It’s all connected: Pathways in visual object recognition and early noun learning. American Psychologist, 68, 618–629. doi:10.1037/a0034185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B., Maouene, J., & Hidaka, S. (2007). The body and children’s word learning. In J. M. Plumert & J. P. Spencer (Eds.), The emerging spatial mind (pp. 168–192). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189223.003.0008
   Google Scholar
• Soska, K. C., Adolph, K. E., & Johnson, S. P. (2010). Systems in development: Motor skill acquisition facilitates three-dimensional object completion. Developmental Psychology, 46, 129–138. doi:10.1037/a0014618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroufe, L. A. (1996). Emotional development: The organization of emotional life in the early years. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511527661
   Google Scholar
• Taikh, A., Hargreaves, I. S., Yap, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2015). Semantic classification of pictures and words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1502–1518. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.975728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thill, S., & Twomey, K. E. (2016). What’s on the inside counts: A grounded account of concept acquisition and development. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant, C., & Pexman, P. M. (2012). Flexible recruitment of semantic richness: Context modulates body-object interaction effects in lexical-semantic processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.0053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Meteyard, L., Andrews, M., & Kousta, S. (2009). Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language & Cognition, 1–2, 219–247. doi:10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.011
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (1987). Children and metaphors. Child Development, 58, 870–885. doi:10.2307/1130223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1983). The emergence of the literal-metaphorical-anomalous distinction in young children. Child Development, 54, 154–161. doi:10.2307/1129872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (1962, trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.1037/11193-000
   Google Scholar
• Waxman, S. R., & Markow, D. B. (1995). Words as invitations to form categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-month-old infants. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 257–302. doi:10.1006/cogp.1995.1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, H. M., Harris, P. L., Banerjee, M., & Sinclair, A. (1995). Early understanding of emotion: Evidence from natural language. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 117–149. doi:10.1080/02699939508409005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellsby, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2014a). Developing embodied cognition: Insights from children's concepts and language processing. Frontiers in Cognitive Science. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellsby, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2014b). The influence of bodily experience on children’s language processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 425–441. doi:10.1111/tops.12092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellsby, M., Siakaluk, P. D., Owen, W. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2011). Embodied semantic processing: The body-object interaction effect in a non-manual task. Language & Cognition, 3, 1–14. doi:10.1515/LANGCOG.2011.001
   Google Scholar
• Wiemer-Hastings, K., & Xu, X. (2005). Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Science, 29, 719–736. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, E., Rosenstiel, A. K., & Gardner, H. (1976). The development of metaphoric understanding. Developmental Psychology, 12, 289–297. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.12.4.289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., Pexman, P. M., Wellsby, M., Hargreaves, I. S., & Huff, M. (2012). An abundance of riches: Cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdrazilova, L., & Pexman, P. M. (2013). Grasping the invisible: Semantic processing of abstract words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1312–1318. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0452-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar