Parallel semantic processing in reading revisited: effects of translation equivalents in bilingual readers

References

• Altarriba, J., Kambe, G., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2001). Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent spanish-English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 875–890. doi: 10.3758/BF03194444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angele, B., Tran, R., & Rayner, K. (2013). Parafoveal–foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 526–538. doi: 10.1037/a0029492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A pratical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2007). The interplay between parafoveal preview and morphological processing in reading. In R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, & R. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain. Oxford: Elsevier. doi: 10.1075/ml.6.1.04ber
   Google Scholar
• Brothers, T., & Traxler, M. J. (2016). Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(12), 1894–1906. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M. (2013). Lextale_FR: A fast, free, and efficient test to measure language proficiency in French. Psychologica Belgica, 53, 23–37. doi: 10.5334/pb-53-1-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalmaijer, E., Mathôt, S., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2014). Pygaze: An open-source, crossplatform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 913–921. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0422-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dare, N., & Shillcock, R. (2013). Serial and parallel processing in reading: Investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 417–428. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.759979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 668–687. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2005). Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 341–371. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabetia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Masked translation priming effects with highly proficient simultaneous bilinguals. Experimental Psychology, 57, 98–107. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Swift: A dynamic model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., … Pallier, C. (2010). The French lexicon project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 488–496. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680–698. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Dijkstra, T. (1992). On the representation and use of language information in bilinguals. In R.J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2016). A vision of reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 171–179. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (1998). Masked translation priming in bilinguals. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 601–623. doi: 10.1080/016909698386393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Mathôt, S., & Vitu, F. (2014). Test of a model of multi-word reading: Effects of parafoveal flanking letters on foveal word recognition. Acta Psychologica, 146, 35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttentag, R., Haith, M., Goodman, G., & Hauch, J. (1984). Semantic processing of unattended words by bilinguals: A test of the input switch mechanism. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 178–188. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90126-9
   Google Scholar
• Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Semantic preview benefit during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 166–190. doi: 10.1037/a0033670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A., Radach, R., Starr, M., & Greenberg, S. (2000). Allocation of visuospatial attention and saccade programming during reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B., Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., Drieghe, D., & Rayner, K. (2009). Parafoveal processing within and between words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1356–1376. doi: 10.1080/17470210802400010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass, R., & Raftery, A. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Hohenstein, S., & McDonald, S. (2013). How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 581–600. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.658073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 325–343. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, C., Hawelka, S., Schuster, S., & Hutzler, F. (2017). Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers. Scientific Reports, 7, 41602. doi: 10.1038/srep41602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Opensesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 314–324. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Masked associative/semantic priming effects across languages with highly proficient bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 916–930. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2004). Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 3–26. doi: 10.1080/09541440340000295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Schotter, E., & Drieghe, D. (2014). Lack of semantic parafoveal preview benefit revisited. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1067–1072. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0582-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). E-Z reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 4–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, R. G., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(1), 34–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J., Speckman, P., Sun, D., & Morey, R. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, W., & LaBerge, D. (1979). Automatic semantic processing of unattended words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 413–426. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90228-7
   Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. (2013). Synonyms provide semantic preview benefit in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 619–633. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 74, 5–35. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E., Reichle, E., & Rayner, K. (2014). Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial attention models can account for semantic preview benefit and n + 2 preview effects. Visual Cognition, 22, 309–333. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2013.873508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 65–76. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2017). The sentence superiority effect revisited. Cognition, 168, 217–221. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, J., Meeter, M., & Grainger, J. (2017b). Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading. PLoS ONE, 12, e0173720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, J., Vitu, F., & Grainger, J. (2017a). Spatial integration of parafoveal orthographic information: Beyond the sub-lexical level? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 1984–1996. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1217247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thierry, G., & Wu, Y. J. (2007). Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 12530–12535. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609927104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heuven, W., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1176–1190. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2014). Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers’ lexical representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 41, 219–232. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Congnition, 38, 1069–1075. doi: 10.1037/a0026935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar