Testing predictions about the processing of word stress in reading using event-related potentials

References

• Albright, A. (2002). Islands of reliability for regular morphology: Evidence from Italian. Language, 78, 684–709. doi: 10.1353/lan.2003.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2003). Effects of stress typicality during speeded grammatical classification. Language and Speech, 46, 353–374. doi: 10.1177/00238309030460040101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2006). The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 920–948. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., & Monaghan, P. (2009). Probabilistic cues to grammatical category in English orthography and their influence during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 73–93. doi: 10.1080/10888430802633508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., Monaghan, P., & Seva, N. (2010). Learning to assign lexical stress during reading aloud: Corpus, behavioral, and computational investigations. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 180–196. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM): Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolinger, D. (1958). A theory of pitch accent in English. Word, 14, 109–149. doi: 10.1080/00437956.1958.11659660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904–911. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chateau, D., & Jared, D. (2003). Spelling-sound consistency effects in disyllabic word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 255–280. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596x(02)00521-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, L., Deguchi, C., Boureux, M., Sarlo, M., & Besson, M. (2011). Detection of pitch violations depends upon the familiarity of intonational contour of sentences. Cortex, 47, 557–568. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, L., Zevin, J., & García, A. V. (2009). Stress priming in reading and the selective modulation of lexical and sub-lexical pathways. PloS One, 4, e7219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies in information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dambacher, M., Kliegl, R., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading. Brain Research, 1084, 89–103. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domahs, U., Kehrein, W., Knaus, J., Wiese, R., & Schlesewsky, M. (2009). Event-related potentials reflecting the processing of phonological constraint violations. Language and Speech, 52, 415–435. doi: 10.1177/0023830909336581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epelboim, J., Booth, J. R., Ashkenazy, R., Taleghani, A., & Steinman, R. M. (1997). Fillers and spaces in text: The importance of word recognition during reading. Vision Research, 37, 2899–2914. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00095-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernestus, M., & Neijt, A. (2008). Word length and the location of primary word stress in Dutch, German, and English. Linguistics, 46, 507–540. doi: 10.1515/LING.2008.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer-Baum, S., Dickson, D. S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2014). Frequency and regularity effects in reading are task dependent: Evidence from ERPs. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 1342–1355. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.927067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudge, E. (1984). English word stress. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Guion, S. G., Clark, J. J., Harada, T., & Wayland, R. P. (2003). Factors affecting stress placement for English non-words include syllabic structure, lexical class, and stress patterns of phonologically similar words. Language and Speech, 46, 403–426. doi: 10.1177/00238309030460040301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. (1999). The phonology of English. A prosodic optimality-theoretic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. (1982). Extrametracality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 227–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., & O’Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 938–950. doi: 10.1162/089892902760191153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honbolygó, F., & Csépe, V. (2013). Saliency or template? ERP evidence for long-term representation of word stress. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87, 165–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jared, D. (2002). Spelling–sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 723–750. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounios, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (1994). Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 804–823. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, M. (2009). The phonology of Italian. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriukova, O., & Mani, N. (2016). Processing metrical information in silent reading: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1059. Art. 1432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. Psychophysiology, 48, 176–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01058.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., & Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 570–590. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.3.570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milin, P., Feldman, L. B., Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., Baayen, R. H., & van Rijn, H. (2017). Discrimination in lexical decision. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0171935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molczanow, J., Domahs, U., Knaus, J., & Weise, R. (2013). The lexical representation of word stress in Russian: Evidence from event-related potentials. The Mental Lexicon, 8, 164–194. doi: 10.1075/ml.8.2.03mol
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, P., Arciuli, J., & Seva, N. (2016). Cross-lninguistic evidence for probabilistic orthographic cues to lexical stress. In J. Thomson & L. Jamulowicz (Eds.), Linguistic rhythm and literacy (pp. 217–236). Amesterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61–64. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061
   Google Scholar
• Mundy, I. R., & Carroll, J. M. (2012). Speech prosody and developmental dyslexia: Reduced phonological awareness in the context of intact phonological representations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 560–581. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2012.662341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R. (2001). The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology, 38, 1–21. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3810001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J. M. (2011). Fieldtrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. Article ID: 156869. doi: 10.1155/2011/156869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pater, J. (2000). Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology, 17, 237–274. doi: 10.1017/S0952675700003900
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2002). On the nature of phonological assembly: Evidence from backward masking. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 31–59. doi: 10.1080/01690960042000157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the connectionist dual process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 106–151. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2013). A computational and empirical investigation of graphemes in reading. Cognitive Science, 37, 800–828. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 277–282. doi: 10.3758/BF03212951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 482–503. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.2.482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 342–364. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971. doi: 10.1080/01690960802069730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (2006). Reading aloud is not automatic: Processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1303–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeloffs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1998). Metrical structure in planning the production of spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 992–939. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.4.922
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O. (2006). Lexical stress encoding in single word production estimated by event-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 1112, 201–212. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.027
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D., Magne, C., & Besson, M. (2004). The music of speech: Music training facilitates pitch processing in both music and language. Psychophysiology, 41, 341–349. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00172.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. (1980). The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 563–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereno, S. C., Raynor, K., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport, 9, 2195–2200. doi:10.1097/00001756-109908130-00009 doi: 10.1097/00001756-199807130-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ševa, N., Monaghan, P., & Arciuli, J. (2009). Stressing what is important: Orthographic cues and lexical stress assignment. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 237–249. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauß, A., Kotz, S. A., & Obleser, J. (2013). Narrowed expectancies under degraded speech: Revisiting the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1383–1395. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulpizio, S., Burani, C., & Colombo, L. (2015). The process of stress assignment in reading aloud: Critical issues from studies on Italian. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 5–20. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2014.976340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulpizio, S., & Colombo, L. (2017). Early markers of lexical stress in visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0735-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulpizio, S., Spinelli, G., & Burani, C. (2015). Stress affects articulatory planning in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 453–461. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1981). Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction. Psychological Review, 88, 135–170. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.2.135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (2001). Processing of orthographic structure by adults of different reading ability. Language and Speech, 44, 351–376. doi: 10.1177/00238309010440030301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (2015). The nature of lexical repreentations in visual word recognition. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 99–113). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203–224. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 50, 439–456. doi: 10.1080/713755710
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, S., & Perry, C. (2015). What do you mean by that?! An electrophysiological study of emotional and attitudinal prosody. PLoS One, 10, e0132947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, G. F. (2010). A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. Attention, Perception, Psychophysics, 72, 2031–2046. doi:10.3758/APP.72.8.2031 doi: 10.3758/BF03196680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 502–529. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 971–979. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yum, Y. N., Law, S.-P., Su, I.-F., Lau, K.-Y. D., & Mo, K. N. (2014). An ERP study of effects of regularity and consistency in delayed naming and lexicality judgment in a logographic writing system. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 315. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Coltheart, M. (2003). Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: The case of the regularity effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 947–953. doi: 10.3758/BF03196556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar