229
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REGULAR ARTICLES

When serial letter processing implies a facilitative length effect

ORCID Icon
Pages 659-664 | Received 13 Mar 2017, Accepted 07 Nov 2017, Published online: 20 Nov 2017

References

  • Almeida, D., & Poeppel, D. (2013). Word-specific repetition effects revealed by MEG and the implications for lexical access. Brain and Language, 127(3), 497–509. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.09.013
  • Assadollahi, R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2003). Early influences of word length and frequency: A group study using MEG. Neuroreport, 14(8), 1183–1187. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000075305.76650.60
  • Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283
  • Boros, M., Anton, J.-L., Pech-Georgel, C., Grainger, J., Szwed, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2016). Orthographic processing deficits in developmental dyslexia: Beyond the ventral visual stream. NeuroImage, 128, 316–327. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.014
  • Carreiras, M., Armstrong, B. C., Perea, M., & Frost, R. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
  • Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Vinckier, F., Jobert, A., & Montavont, A. (2008). Reading normal and degraded words: Contribution of the dorsal and ventral visual pathways. NeuroImage, 40(1), 353–366. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.036
  • Eberhard-Moscicka, A. K., Jost, L. B., Fehlbaum, L. V., Pfenninger, S. E., & Maurer, U. (2016). Temporal dynamics of early visual word processing - early versus late N1 sensitivity in children and adults. Neuropsychologia, 91, 509–518. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.014
  • Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. NeuroImage, 30(4), 1383–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.048
  • Hirshorn, E. A., Li, Y., Ward, M. J., Richardson, R. M., Fiez, J. A., & Ghuman, A. S. (2016). Decoding and disrupting left midfusiform gyrus activity during word reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(29), 8162–8167. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604126113
  • Hudson, P. T. W., & Bergman, M. W. (1985). Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(1), 46–58. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90015-4
  • Juphard, A., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (2004). Length effect in reading and lexical decision: Evidence from skilled readers and a developmental dyslexic participant. Brain and Cognition, 55(2), 332–340. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.035
  • Oganian, Y., Froehlich, E., Schlickeiser, U., Hofmann, M. J., Heekeren, H. R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Slower perception followed by faster lexical decision in Longer words: A diffusion model analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1958. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01958
  • Sullivan, T. J., & de Sa, V. R. (2008). Sleeping Our Way to weight normalization and stable learning. Neural Computation, 20(12), 3111–3130. doi: 10.1162/neco.2008.04-07-502
  • Turrigiano, G. G. (2008). The self-tuning neuron: Synaptic scaling of excitatory synapses. Cell, 135(3), 422–435. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.008
  • Valdois, S., Carbonnel, S., Juphard, A., Baciu, M., Ans, B., Peyrin, C., & Segebarth, C. (2006). Polysyllabic pseudo-word processing in reading and lexical decision: Converging evidence from behavioral data, connectionist simulations and functional MRI. Brain Research, 1085(1), 149–162. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.049
  • Vinckier, F., Qiao, E., Pallier, C., Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011). The impact of letter spacing on reading: A test of the bigram coding hypothesis. Journal of Vision, 11(6), 8–8. doi: 10.1167/11.6.8
  • Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221–243. doi: 10.3758/BF03196158
  • Whitney, C. (2008). Supporting the serial in the SERIOL model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(6), 824–865. doi: 10.1080/01690960701828202
  • Whitney, C. (2011). Location, location, location: How it affects the neighborhood (effect). Brain and Language, 118(3), 90–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.03.001
  • Whitney, C., & Cornelissen, P. (2005). Letter-position encoding and dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(3), 274–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00270.x
  • Whitney, C., & Marton, Y. (2013). The SERIOL2 model of orthographic processing. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED543279.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.