Towards a unified model of semantic memory: validation and theoretical implications of the conceptual feature rating space

References

• Allen, R., & Hulme, C. (2006). Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(1), 64–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, L. J. P., Saleem, A., Kendall, D., Heilman, K. M., & Rothi, L. J. G. (2006). Orthographic directionality and thematic role illustration in English and Arabic. Brain and Language, 97(3), 306–316. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.12.003. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X05003445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D. (2009). Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review, 116(3), 463–498. doi:10.1037/a0016261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., & Sarkar, D. (2006). The lme4 package. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/
   Google Scholar
• Bleasdale, F. A. (1987). Concreteness-dependent associative priming: Separate lexical organization for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 582–594. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom, G. (1958). Statistical estimates and transformed beta-variables.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, M. F., Vesely, L., Price, C., Anderson, C., Richmond, L., Farag, C., … Grossman, M. (2009). Reversal of the concreteness effect in semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(6), 568–579. doi:919094196 [pii] 10.1080/02643290903512305 [doi] doi: 10.1080/02643290903512305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breedin, S. D., Saffran, E. M., & Coslett, H. B. (1994). Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(6), 617–660. doi: 10.1080/02643299408251987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210. doi: 10.1007/BF01320076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 163–201. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutch, S. J., Connell, S., & Warrington, E. K. (2009). The different representational frameworks underpinning abstract and concrete knowledge: Evidence from odd-one-out judgements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(7), 1377–1390. doi:10.1080/17470210802483834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutch, S. J., & Jackson, E. C. (2011). Contrasting graded effects of semantic similarity and association across the concreteness spectrum. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(7), 1388–1408. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.543285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutch, S. J., Troche, J., Reilly, J., & Ridgway, G. R. (2013). Abstract conceptual feature ratings: The role of emotion, magnitude, and other cognitive domains in the organization of abstract conceptual knowledge. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 186. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (2005). Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain, 128(3), 615–627. Retrieved from http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/128/3/615.abstract doi: 10.1093/brain/awh349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutch, S. J., Williams, P., Ridgway, G. R., & Borgenicht, L. (2012). The role of polarity in antonym and synonym conceptual knowledge: Evidence from stroke aphasia and multidimensional ratings of abstract words. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2636–2644. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1995). Abstract word anomia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12(5), 549–566. doi: 10.1080/02643299508252007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3-4), 455–479. doi:10.1080/02643290442000310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrard, P., Lambon-Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2001). Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(2), 125–174. doi:10.1080/02643290042000053. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pbh&AN=4431035&site=ehost-live doi: 10.1080/02643290125857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K., & Logie, R. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12(4), 395–427. doi:10.3758/BF03201693
   Google Scholar
• Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, M., McMillan, C., Moore, P., Ding, L., Glosser, G., Work, M., & Gee, J. (2004). What’s in a name: Voxel-based morphometric analyses of MRI and naming difficulty in Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia and corticobasal degeneration. Brain, 127(3), 628–649. doi:10.1093/brain/awh075
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guo, K., Hall, C., Hall, S., Meints, K., & Mills, D. (2007). Left gaze bias in human infants, rhesus monkeys, and domestic dogs. Perception, 36, 409–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1960). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 132(3423), 349–350. doi:10.2307/1706082. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1706082 doi: 10.1126/science.132.3423.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 923–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). When does semantic similarity help episodic retrieval? Journal of Memory and Language, 46(1), 85–98. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2798. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X01927986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., Jones, R. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2009). Comprehension of concrete and abstract words in semantic dementia. Neuropsychology, 23(4), 492–499. doi:10.1037/a0015452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Jackson, B. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science, 154(3756), 1583–1585. doi:10.2307/1720478. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1720478 doi: 10.1126/science.154.3756.1583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelewijn, T., Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., Zekveld, A. A., & Kramer, S. E. (2014). The pupil response is sensitive to divided attention during speech processing. Hearing Research, 312(0), 114–120. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2014.03.010. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595514000422
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14–34. doi:10.1037/a0021446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffat, M., Siakaluk, P. D., Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2015). Situated conceptualization and semantic processing: Effects of emotional experience and context availability in semantic categorization and naming tasks. [Journal article]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 408–419. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0696-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, P. I., Campbell, C., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2012). Effects of emotional and sensorimotor knowledge in semantic processing of concrete and abstract nouns. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 275. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes, L. (1980). The positioning of type on maps: The effect of surrounding material on word recognition time. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 22(3), 353–360. doi: 10.1177/001872088002200309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 45(3), 255–287. doi: 10.1037/h0084295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (2013). Dual coding theory, word abstractness, and emotion: A critical review of Kousta et al. (2011). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 282–287. doi: 10.1037/a0027004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(1, Pt.2), 1–25. doi:10.1037/h0025327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips, R. J. (1981). Searching for a target in a random arrangement of names: An eye fixation analysis. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 35(4), 330–346. doi:10.1037/h0081192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piatt, A. L., Fields, J. A., Paolo, A. M., Koller, W. C., & Tröster, A. I. (1999). Lexical, semantic, and action verbal fluency in Parkinson’s disease with and without dementia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21(4), 435–443. doi:10.1076/jcen.21.4.435.885. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1076/jcen.21.4.435.885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Fisher, D. (1987). Letter processing during eye fixations in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 42(1), 87–100. doi:10.3758/bf03211517
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing: R foundation for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, J., Peelle, J. E., Antonucci, S. M., & Grossman, M. (2011). Anomia as a marker of distinct semantic memory impairments in Alzheimer’s disease and semantic dementia. Neuropsychology, 25(4), 413–426. doi:10.1037/a0022738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, J., Peelle, J. E., & Grossman, M. (2007). A unitary semantics account of reverse concreteness effects in semantic dementia. Brain and Language, 103(1–2), 86–87. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.07.057. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X07001769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, J., Troche, J., & Grossman, M. (2011). Language processing in dementia (pp. 336–368). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20(1), 96–104. doi: 10.3758/BF03208259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(5), 499–520. doi:10.1016/0749-596x(88)90022-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(1), 82–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troche, J., Crutch, S. J., & Reilly, J. (2014). Clustering, hierarchical organization, and the topography of abstract and concrete nouns. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 360. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00360.eCollection2014 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troche, J., Crutch, S. J., & Reilly, J. (2017). Defining a conceptual topography of word concreteness: Clustering properties of emotion, sensation, and magnitude among 750 English words. [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1787). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01787. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01787
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., & Levy, J. P. (2000). Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain and Language, 75(2), 195–231. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X00923538 doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Meer, E., Beyer, R., Horn, J., Foth, M., Bornemann, B., Ries, J., … Wartenburger, I. (2010). Resource allocation and fluid intelligence: Insights from pupillometry. Psychophysiology, 47(1), 158–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00884.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S.-T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. (2013). The neural representation of abstract words: The role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht025. Retrieved from http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/02/13/cercor.bht025.abstract
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48(4), 422–488. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, I., & Hulme, C. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(5), 1256–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27(4), 635–657. doi: 10.1080/14640747508400525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K. (1981). Concrete word dyslexia. British Journal of Psychology, 72(2), 175–196. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1981.tb02175.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiemer-Hastings, K., & Xu, X. (2005). Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Science, 29(5), 719–736. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaromb, F. M., Howard, M. W., Dolan, E. D., Sirotin, Y. B., Tully, M., Wingfield, A., & Kahana, M. J. (2006). Temporal associations and prior-list intrusions in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), 792–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., Kramer, S. E., & Festen, J. M. (2011). Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: The influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Ear and Hearing, 32(4), 498–510. doi:10.1097/AUD.1090b1013e31820512bb. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/ear-hearing/Fulltext/2011/07000/Cognitive_Load_During_Speech_Perception_in_Noise_.8.aspx doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820512bb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar