Predictive processing of aspectual information: evidence from event-related brain potentials

References

• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio, G., Choma, T., van Lambalgen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2010). Coercion and compositionality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(9), 2131–2140. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–362). New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, O. (2010). The processing of events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, O., & Gattnar, A. (2015). The cross-linguistic processing of aspect: An eyetracking study on the time course of aspectual interpretation in Russian and German. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(7), 877–898. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1029499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bott, O., & Hamm, F. (2014). Cross-linguistic variation in the processing of aspect. In B. Hemforth, B. Mertins, & C. Fabricius-Hansen (Eds.), Psycholinguistic approaches to meaning and understanding across languages (pp. 83–109). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, J., & Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of aspectual coercion. Brain and Language, 106(2), 132–143. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127–143. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, W.-Y., Momma, S., Smith, C., Lau, E., & Phillips, C. (2016). Prediction as memory retrieval: Timing and mechanisms. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(5), 617–627. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1160135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, W.-Y., Smith, C., Lau, E., & Phillips, C. (2016). A “bag-of-arguments” mechanisms for initial verb predictions. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(5), 577–596. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1066832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K., Troyer, M., & Kutas, M. (2014). Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(12), 631–645. doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12093
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Swart, H. (1998). Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 347–385. doi: 10.1023/A:1005916004600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dölling, J. (1995). Ontological domains, semantic sorts and systematic ambiguity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5-6), 785–807. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dölling, J. (2014). Aspectual coercion and eventuality structure. In K. Robering (Ed.), Events, arguments, and aspects: Topics in the semantics and verbs (pp. 189–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word meaning and montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in montague's PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, A. (2007). Ibex Farm. Retrieved from http://spellout.net/ibexfarm/
   Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44, 491–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flecken, M., Walbert, K., & Dikkstra, T. (2016). Right now, Sophie *swims in the pool?!: brain potentials of grammatical aspect processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., & McElree, B. (2008). Complement coercion is not modulated by competition: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, M. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112. doi: 10.1007/BF02289823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304(5669), 438–441. doi: 10.1126/science.1095455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic early parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118–135. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husband, E. M., Kelly, L. A., & Zhu, D. C. (2011). Using complement coercion to understand the neural basis of semantic composition: Evidence from an fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3254–3266. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, A., Corley, M., Pickering, M. J., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2016). Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 157–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371–375.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, R. G., Choi, A., Cohn, N., Paczynski, M., & Jackendoff, R. (2010). Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12), 2685–2701. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Word expectancy and event-related brain potentials during sentence processing. In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory states and processes (pp. 217–237). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2013). Dissociating N400 effects of predictions from association in single-word contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(30), 485–502.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Namyst, A., Fogel, A., & Delgado, T. (2016). A direct comparison of N400 effects of predictability and incongruity in adjective-noun combination. Collabra, 2(1), 1–19. 13. doi: 10.1525/collabra.40
   Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Stroud, C., Plesch, S., & Phillips, C. (2006). The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain and Language, 98(1), 74–88. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126–1177. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, S. (2010). Jishookanrendeni-o mochiita asupekuto joohooshori-no kenkyu [An event-related potentials study of aspectual information processing]. Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University, Part. II, pp. 319–327.
   Google Scholar
• Long, S., Ono, H., & Sakai, H. (2010). Bunshori-no katei-niokeru jishootaipu-no ninchi: Nihongo-no asupekuto joohooshori-o tegakarini [Recognition of event type in sentence comprehension: A view from processing of aspectual information in Japanese]. Cognitive Studies, 17(2), 313–331.
   Google Scholar
• McElree, B., Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2006). Deferred interpretations: Why starting Dickens is taxing but reading Dickens isn't. Cognitive Science, 30, 181–192. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B., Traxler, J. M., Pickering, J. M., Seely, E. R., & Jackendoff, R. (2001). Reading time evidence for enriched composition. Cognition, 78(1), B17–B25. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00113-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moens, M. (1987). Tense, aspect, and temporal reference (Doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Moens, M., & Steedman, M. (1988). Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics, 14, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Molinaro, N., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 47(8), 908–930. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paczynski, M., Jackendoff, R., & Kuperberg, G. (2014). When events change their nature: The neurocognitive mechanisms underlying aspectual coercion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(9), 1905–1917. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., McElree, B., Frisson, S., & Chen, L. (2006). Underspecification and aspectual coercion. Discourse Processes, 42(2), 131–155. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4202_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñango, M. M., Winnick, A., Ullah, R., & Zurif, E. (2006). Time-course of semantic composition: The case of aspectual coercion. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(3), 233–244. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9013-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñango, M., Zurif, E., & Jackendoff, R. (1999). Real-time processing implications of enriched composition at the syntax-semantics interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(4), 395–414. doi: 10.1023/A:1023241115818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 17(4), 409–441.
   Google Scholar
• Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, L., Martin, A. E., McElree, B., & Smart, A. (2009). The anterior midline field: Coercion or decision making? Brain and Language, 108(3), 184–190. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, L., & McElree, B. (2007). An MEG study of silent meaning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1905–1921. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. S. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, K., & Drury, J. E. (2012). On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies. Brain and Language, 120, 135–162. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorova, M., Straub, K., Badecker, W., & Frank, R. (2000a). Aspectual coercion and the online computation of sentential aspect. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3–8). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Todorova, M., Straub, K., Badecker, W., & Frank, R. (2000b). Processing correlates of aspectual computation (The Workshop on Events and Paths). ESSLLI XII.
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., McElree, B., Williams, R. S., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). Context effects in coercion: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Pickering, M. J., & McElree, B. (2002). Coercion in sentence processing: Evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(4), 530–547. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00021-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lambalgen, M., & Hamm, F. (2005). The proper treatment of events. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2015). Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading. Cortex, 68, 20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yano, M., & Sakamoto, T. (2016a). The functional dissociations between semantic repair and revision processes in Japanese. Studies in Language Sciences, 14, 106–125. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
   Google Scholar
• Yano, M., & Sakamoto, T. (2016b). The interaction of morphosyntactic and semantic processing in Japanese sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Gengo Kenkyu, 149, 43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2008). Brain responses to agreement violations of Chinese grammatical aspect. NeuroReport, 19(10), 1039–1043. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328302f14f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar