The influence of a first language: training nonnative listeners on voicing contrasts

References

• Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 233–250. doi: 10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00036-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of nonnative consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 775–794. doi: 10.1121/1.1332378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 345–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-109/110, 89–108.
   Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., Traill, A., Carter, A., Harrison, K. D., & Faber, A. (2003). !Xóõ click perception by English, Isizulu, and Sesotho listeners. Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In M. J. Munro & O.-S. Bohn (Eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2013). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.60. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tokhura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 977–985. doi: 10.3758/BF03206911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandmeyer, A., Desain, P. W. M., & McQueen, J. (2012). Effects of native language on perceptual sensitivity tophonetic cues. NeuroReport, 23, 653–657. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835542cd
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundgaard-Nielse, R. L., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2011). Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 51–67. doi: 10.1017/S0142716410000287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dmitrieva, O., Llanos, F., Shultz, A. A., & Francis, A. L. (2015). Phonological status, not voice onset time, determines the acoustic realization of onset f0 as a secondary voicing cue in Spanish and English. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 77–95. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvin, J., Williams, D., & Escudero, P. (2016). Dynamic acoustic properties of monophthongs and diphthongs in Western Sydney Australian English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140, 576. doi: 10.1121/1.4952387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. doi: 10.3758/BF03203267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, J. L. (1972). Speech analysis: Synthesis and perception (2nd ed.). Oxford: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Flege, J. E. (1989). Chinese subjects’ perception of the word-final English /t/–/d/ contrast: Performance before and after training. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1684–1697. doi: 10.1121/1.398599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 229–273). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, A. L., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2002). Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 349–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3267–3278. doi: 10.1121/1.2062307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, A., Debener, S., Gratton, G., Junghöfer, M., Kappenman, E. S., Luck, S. J.,  … Yee, C. M. (2014). Committee report: Publication guidelines and recommendation for studies using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Psychophysiology, 51, 1–21. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, N., McGee, T., Carrell, T. D., King, C., Tremblay, K., & Nicol, T. (1995). Central auditory system plasticity associated with speech discrimination training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 25–32. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. (1993). Innate predispositions and the effects of experience in speech perception: The native language magnet theory. In B. Boysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. McNeilage, & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp. 259–274). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P., Conboy, B., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008). Phonetic learning as apathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 979–1000. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606–608. doi: 10.1126/science.1736364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in intial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422. doi: 10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1967). Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech, 10, 1–28. doi: 10.1177/002383096701000101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R., & Holt, L. L. (2011). Neural changes associated with nonspeech auditory category learning parallel those of speech category acquisition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 683–698. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1242–1255. doi: 10.1121/1.408177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llanos, F., Dmitrieva, O., Shultz, A., & Francis, A. L. (2013). Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, 2213–2224. doi: 10.1121/1.4817845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 874–886. doi: 10.1121/1.1894649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. DeGroot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 49–67). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2012). The logic of the unified model. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 211–227). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCandliss, B. D., Fiez, J. A., Protopapas, A., Conway, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2002). Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: Tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 89–108. doi: 10.3758/CABN.2.2.89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J., Fiez, J., & McCandliss, B. (2002). Teaching the /r/–/l/ discrimination to Japanese adults: Behavioral and neural aspects. Physiology & Behavior, 77, 657–662. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00916-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. L. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing. Second Language Research, 21, 152–174. doi: 10.1191/0267658305sr256oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R. (2001). The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology, 38, 1–21. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3810001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A.,  … Alho, K. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385, 432–434. doi: 10.1038/385432a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2544–2590. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., Pakarinen, S., Rinne, T., & Takegata, R. (2004). The mismatch negativity (MMN): Towards the optimal paradigm. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 140–144. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826–859. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nenonen, S., Shestakova, A., Huotilainen, M., & Näätänen, R. (2003). Linguistic relevance of duration within the native language determines the accuracy of speech-sound duration processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 492–495. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00055-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nenonen, S., Shestakova, A., Huotilainen, M., & Näätänen, R. (2005). Speech-sound duration processing in a second language is specific to phonetic categories. Brain and Language, 92, 26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–283. doi: 10.1007/BF01067377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallier, C., Bosch, L., & Sebastian-Gallés, N. (1997). A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition, 64, B9–B17. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00030-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltola, M. S., Kujala, T., Tuomainen, J., Ek, M., Aaltonen, O., & Näätänen, R. (2003). Native and foreign vowel discrimination as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) response. Neuroscience Letters, 352, 25–28. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.08.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215. doi: 10.1006/jpho.2001.0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polka, L. (1995). Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1286–1296. doi: 10.1121/1.412170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt, J. S., Jenkins, J. J., & Strange, W. (2006). Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1684–1696. doi: 10.1121/1.2161427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, J. (1981). Manual for raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Research supplement no. 1: The 1979 British standardisation of the standard progressive matrices and mill hill vocabulary scales, together with comparative data from earlier studies in the UK, US, Canada, Germany, and Ireland. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press/ San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rivera-Gaxiola, M., Csibra, G., Johnson, M. H., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2000). Electrophysiological correlates of cross-linguistic speech perception in native English speakers. Behavioural Brain Research, 111, 13–23. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00139-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sams, M., Alho, K., & Näätänen, R. (1984). Short-term habituation and dishabituation of the mismatch negativity of the ERP. Psychophysiology, 21, 434–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb00223.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (1992). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226. doi: 10.1017/S0267190500002476
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158. doi: 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seliger, H., Krashen, S., & Ladefoged, P. (1975). Maturational constraints in the acquisition of second language accent. Language Sciences, 36, 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., & Dorman, M. F. (2000). Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2697–2703. doi: 10.1121/1.428655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi: 10.1037/h0054651
   Google Scholar
• Summerfield, Q., & Haggard, M. (1977). On the dissociation of spectral and temporal cues to the voicing distinction in initial stop consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 435–448. doi: 10.1121/1.381544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahta, S., Wood, M., & Loewenthal, K. (1981). Age changes in the ability to replicate foreign pronunciation and intonation. Language and Speech, 24, 363–372. doi: 10.1177/002383098102400405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamminen, H., Peltola, M. S., Kujala, T., & Näätänen, R. (2015). Phonetic training and non-native speech perception — New memory traces evolve in just three days as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and behavioural measures. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 97, 23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokowicz, N., Michael, E. B., & Kroll, J. F. (2004). The roles of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001634
   Google Scholar
• Tolentino, L., & Tokowicz, N. (2011). ACROSS LANGUAGES, SPACE, AND TIME: A Review of the Role of Cross-Language Similarity in L2 (Morpho)Syntactic Processing as Revealed by fMRI and ERP Methods. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 91–125. doi: 10.1017/S0272263110000549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., Carrell, T. D., & McGee, T. (1997). Central auditory system plasticity: Generalization to novel stimuli following listening training. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 3762–3773. doi: 10.1121/1.420139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., & McGee, T. (1998). The time course of auditory perceptual learning: Neurophysiological changes during speech-sound training. NeuroReport, 9, 3557–3560. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199811160-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricomi, E., Delgado, M. R., McCandliss, B., McClelland, J. L., & Fiez, J. A. (2006). Performance feedback drives caudate activation in a phonological learning task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1029–1043. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.1029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Logan, J. S. (1985). Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 35–44. doi: 10.3758/BF03207136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80022-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, I., Kujala, T., Tiitinen, H., Sivonen, P., Alku, P., Lehtokoski, A.,  … Näätänen, R. (1999). Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. Psychophysiology, 36, 638–642. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3650638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, I., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., Sams, M., & Näätänen, R. (1990). The effect of small variation of the frequent auditory stimulus on the event-related brain potential to the infrequent stimulus. Psychophysiology, 27, 228–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb00374.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylinen, S., Uther, M., Latvala, A., Vepsäläinen, S., Iverson, P., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Näätänen, R. (2010). Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: A study of Finnish second-language users of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1319–1332. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar