Retrieval cues and syntactic ambiguity resolution: speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence

References

• Altmann, G. T., Garnham, A., & Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(5), 685–712. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90035-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191–238. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90020-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T., van Nice, K. Y., Garnham, A., & Henstra, J. A. (1998). Late closure in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 459–484. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–362). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bornkessel, I., McElree, B., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 495–522. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 368–407. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37–60. doi: 10.3758/BF03210740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. J., & Martin, A. E. (2013). Modeling accuracy as a function of response time with the generalized linear mixed effects model. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 83–96. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosher, B. A., & McElree, B. (2003). Memory search: Retrieval processes in short-term and long-term recognition. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning & memory (pp. 373–379). New York: Gale Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. E. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348–368. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90006-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(6), 725–745. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90034-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D., & Ferreira, F. (1998). Sentence Reanalysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Foraker, S., & McElree, B. (2007). The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 357–383. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6(4), 291–325. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178–210. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodner, D., & Gibson, E. (2005). Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentenial complexity. Cognitive Science, 29(2), 261–290. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodner, D., Gibson, E., Argaman, V., & Babyonyshev, M. (2003). Against repair-based reanalysis in sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(2), 141–166. doi: 10.1023/A:1022496223965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemforth, B., Fernandez, S., Clifton, C., Frazier, L., Konieczny, L., & Walter, M. (2015). Relative clause attachment in German, English, Spanish and French: Effects of position and length. Lingua, 166, 43–64. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., & McClelland, G. H. (1989). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Kohonen, T. (1984). Self-Organization and associative memory. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., & Ferreira, F. (2005). Lingering effects of disfluent material on the comprehension of garden path sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 633–666. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 375–419. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization (No. 8). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676–703. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E. (2016). Language processing as cue integration: Grounding the psychology of language in perception and neurophysiology. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences, 7, 120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E., & McElree, B. (2008). A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 879–906. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E., & McElree, B. (2009). Memory operations that support language comprehension: Evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1231–1239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E., & McElree, B. (2011). Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from sluicing. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 327–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E., Nieuwland, M. S., & Carreiras, M. (2012). Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension. NeuroImage, 59, 1859–1869. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E., Nieuwland, M. S., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Agreement attraction during comprehension of grammatical sentences: ERP evidence from ellipsis. Brain and Language, 135, 42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B. (2000). Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 111–123. doi: 10.1023/A:1005184709695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B. (2006). Accessing recent events. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 46, pp. 155–200). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McElree, B., & Dosher, B. A. (1989). Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(4), 346–373. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.118.4.346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B., & Dosher, B. A. (1993). Serial retrieval processes in the recovery of order information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 291. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 67–91. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00515-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B., & Griffith, T. (1995). Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 134–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B., Pylkkänen, L., Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. (2006). A time course analysis of enriched composition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 53–59. doi: 10.3758/BF03193812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairne, J. S. (2002). The myth of the encoding-retrieval match. Memory, 10, 389–395. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachella, R. G., & Pew, R. W. (1968). Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Reaction Time: Effect of Discrete Criterion Times. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(1p1), 19. doi: 10.1037/h0021275
   Google Scholar
• Schouten, J. F., & Bekker, J. A. M. (1967). Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 27, 143–153. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(67)90054-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, P. (2007). Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery. Cognition, 105, 477–488. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, P., Pickering, M. J., & Crocker, M. W. (1999). Structural change and reanalysis difficulty in language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1), 136–150. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, P., Scheepers, C., & Pickering, M. (2002). Syntactic ambiguity resolution after initial misanalysis: The role of recency. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 371–390. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabor, W., Galantucci, B., & Richardson, D. (2004). Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 355–370. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of content-based expectations. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), 597–632. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90011-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Plausibility and grammatical agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(4), 740–759. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00003-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eyemovements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 69–90. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285–318. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. A., & Lewis, R. L. (2003). Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(3), 285–316. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00081-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B. (2006). Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B. (2011). Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 247–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gompel, R. P., Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2001). Reanalysis in sentence processing: Evidence against current constraint-based and two-stage models. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(2), 225–258. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Build-up of proactive inhibition as a cue overload effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 442–452.
   Google Scholar
• Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67–85. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(77)90012-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar