Coargumenthood and the processing of pronouns

References

• Baayen, H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, H., Davidson, D., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., & Straub, K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on interpretation of pronouns and anaphors.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 748–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. (2013). Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. Its nature, origin, and use. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, W.-Y., Lewis, S., & Phillips, C. (2014). Immediate sensitivity to structural constraints in pronoun resolution. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences, 5, 630. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clackson, K., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2011). Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 128–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clackson, K., & Heyer, V. (2014). Reflexive anaphor resolution in spoken language comprehension: Structural constraints and beyond. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences, 5, 904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, C., Kennison, S., & Albrecht, J. (1997). Reading the words her, his, him: Implications for parsing principles based on frequency and on structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 276–292. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.2499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunnings, I., & Felser, C. (2013). The role of working memory in the processing of reflexives. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 188–219. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.548391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunnings, I., & Sturt, P.. (2014). Coargumenthood and the processing of reflexives. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 117–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., & Phillips, C. (2013). Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 85–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäger, L., Engelmann, F., & Vasishth, S. (2017). Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 316–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, E., Runner, Jeffrey T., Sussman, R. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2009). Structural and semantic constraints on the resolution of pronouns and reflexives. Cognition, 112(1), 55–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, F., & Asudeh, A. (2001). Constraints on linguistic coreference: Structural vs. pragmatic factors. In J. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 483–488). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kennison, S., & Trofe, J. (2003). Comprehending pronouns: A role for word-specific gender stereotype information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 355–378. doi: 10.1023/A:1023599719948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, H., Sturt, P., & Garrod, S. (2008). Processing definitional and stereotypical gender in reference resolution: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 239–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuno, S. (1987). Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kush, D. (2013). Respecting relations: Memory access and antecedent retrieval in incremental sentence processing (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Kush, D., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). Relation-sensitive retrieval: Evidence from bound variable pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 82, 18–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–19. doi: 10.1007/BF01069043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, D., & Phillips, C. (2017). Reflexive attraction in comprehension is selective. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 272–290. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, U., Vasishth, S., & Lewis, R. (2016). Retrieval interference in syntactic processing: The case of reflexive binding in English. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences, 7, 329. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, C., Trompelt, H., & Felser, C. (2014). The online application of binding condition B in native and non-native pronoun resolution. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences, 5, 147. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlmutter, N., Garnsey, S., & Bock, K. (1999). Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 427–456. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, C., & Sag, I. (1992). Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 261–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, T., & Reuland, E. (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 657–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuland, E. (2001). Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 439–492. doi: 10.1162/002438901750372522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuland, E. (2011). Anaphora and language design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runner, J. T., Sussman, R. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2003). Assignment of reference to reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrases: Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 89(1), B1–B13. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00065-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runner, Jeffrey T., Sussman, Rachel S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006). Processing reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrase. Cognitive Science, 30(2), 193–241. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 542–562. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00536-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. (2007). Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 407–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J., & Johns, C. (2012). Memory interference as a determinant of language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 193–211. doi: 10.1002/lnc3.330
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Dyke, J., & McElree, B. (2006). Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, Julie A., & McElree, B. (2011). Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(3), 247–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, T., & Angele, B. (2017). False positives and other statistical errors in standard analyses of eye movements in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 119–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, M., Lau, E., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 206–237. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, M., Dillon, B., & Phillips, C. (2009). Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence. Brain and Language, 108, 40–55. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar