What have labels ever done for us? The linguistic shortcut in conceptual processing

References

• Allport, D. A. (1985). Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In S. K. Newman & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia (pp. 207–244). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D. (2009). Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review, 116, 463–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (2012). Statistical learning from acquiring specific items to forming general rules. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 170–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358, 1177–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.). Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 245–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, S. B., & Sanford, A. J. (1993). A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory & Cognition, 21, 477–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohn, R. E., & Short, J. E. (2009). How much information? 2009 report on American consumers. San Diego, CA: UCSD Global Information Industry Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, M. F., & Grossman, M. (2012). Gray matter density of auditory association cortex relates to knowledge of sound concepts in primary progressive aphasia. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 7986–7991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2014). Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boulenger, V., Mechtouff, L., Thobois, S., Broussolle, E., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A. (2008). Word processing in Parkinson’s disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns. Neuropsychologia, 46, 743–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904–911. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (2004). Bootstrapping & the origin of concepts. Daedalus, 133, 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2010). Look but don’t touch: Tactile disadvantage in processing modality-specific words. Cognition, 115, 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2012). When does perception facilitate or interfere with conceptual processing? The effect of attentional modulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(474), 1–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2013). Flexible and fast: Linguistic shortcut affects both shallow and deep conceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 542–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2014a). I see/hear what you mean: Semantic activation in visual word recognition depends on perceptual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 527–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2014b). Principles of representation: Why you can’t represent the same concept twice. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 390–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., Lynott, D., & Dreyer, F. (2012). A functional role for modality-specific perceptual systems in conceptual representations. PLOS ONE, 7, e33321, 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (2005). Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain, 128, 615–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dils, A. T., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Visual motion aftereffect from understanding motion language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 16396–16400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48, 905–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2006). Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 4917–4921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone, J. (Producer), & Jones, T. (Director). (1979). Monty Python’s life of brian. [Motion picture]. London, UK: HandMade Films and Python (Monty) Pictures Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 21, 191–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, S., & Louwerse, M. (2013). Language statistics and individual differences in processing primary metaphors. Cognitive Linguistics, 24, 667–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, S., & Louwerse, M. M. (2014). Language statistics explain the spatial–numerical association of response codes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 470–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2018). Can illness be bright? Linguistic distributional frequency and ease of simulation affect metaphor comprehension. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 273–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tops.2011.3.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35, 381–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M., & Hutchinson, S. (2012). Neurological evidence linguistic processes precede perceptual simulation in conceptual processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 385(3), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2008). Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic. In M. de Vega, A. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Embodiment and meaning: A debate (pp. 309–326). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114, 96–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupyan, G., & Ward, E. J. (2013). Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 14196–14201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2009). Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 558–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2010). Embodied conceptual combination. Frontiers in Psychology, 212(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2013). Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: The relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 516–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinaro, N., Barraza, P., & Carreiras, M. (2013). Long-range neural synchronization supports fast and efficient reading: EEG correlates of processing expected words in sentences. NeuroImage, 72, 120–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316, 1002–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riordan, B., & Jones, M. N. (2011). Redundancy in perceptual and linguistic experience: Comparing feature-based and distributional models of semantic representation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 303–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 110–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., & Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 382–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, A., Chaigneau, S. E., Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2011). Property generation reflects word association and situated simulation. Language and Cognition, 3, 83–119.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, W. K., Hamann, S. B., Harenski, C. N., Hu, X. P., & Barsalou, L. W. (2008). fMRI evidence for word association and situated simulation in conceptual processing. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102, 106–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L., & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition, 106, 1558–1568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, K. O., & Barsalou, L. W. (2004). Perceptual simulation in property verification. Memory & Cognition, 32, 244–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Meteyard, L., Andrews, M., & Kousta, S. (2009). Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition, 1, 219–247.
   Google Scholar
• Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7780–7785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F. (2002). The role of language in acquiring object kind concepts in infancy. Cognition, 85, 223–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, E., Chrysikou, E. G., Hoffman, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2013). Manual experience shapes object representations. Psychological Science, 24, 909–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar