613
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

ERP Indicators of local and global text influences on word-to-text integration

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 13-28 | Received 30 Jun 2017, Accepted 25 Jun 2018, Published online: 07 Aug 2018

References

  • Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1061–1070.
  • Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1990). Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(4), 413–432. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90064-7
  • Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127–143. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055
  • Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1–8. doi: 10.2307/1128873
  • Burkhardt, P. (2007). The P600 reflects cost of new information in discourse memory. Neuroreport, 18(17), 1851–1854. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f1a999
  • Calloway, R. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (2017). Integrative and predictive processes in text reading: The N400 across a sentence boundary. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 1001–1016. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1279340
  • Dien, J. (1998). Issues in the application of the average reference: Review, critiques, and recommendations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 34–43. doi: 10.3758/BF03209414
  • Ferree, T. C. (2006). Spherical splines and average referencing in scalp electroencephalography. Brain Topography, 19(1), 43–52. doi: 10.1007/s10548-006-0011-0
  • Ferree, T. C., Luu, P., Russell, G. S., & Tucker, D. M. (2001). Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(3), 536–544. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00533-2
  • Ferretti, T. R., Singer, M., & Patterson, C. (2008). Electrophysiological evidence for the time-course of verifying text ideas. Cognition, 108(3), 881–888. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.002
  • Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1991). Cognitive processes and mechanisms in language comprehension: The structure building framework. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 217–263). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 265–304. doi: 10.1080/01638539709544994
  • Goldman, S. R., & Varma, S. (1995). CAPping the construction-integration model of discourse comprehension. In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 337–358). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Graesser, A., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371.
  • Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304(5669), 438–441. doi: 10.1126/science.1095455
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329
  • Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163.
  • Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23–49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063
  • Kuperberg, G. R., Paczynski, M., & Ditman, T. (2011). Establishing causal coherence across sentences: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(5), 1230–1246. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21452
  • Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
  • Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. doi: 10.1126/science.7350657
  • Lorch, R. F., & Lorch, E. P. (1985). Theme structure representation and text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 137–148. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.77.2.137
  • Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676–703. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
  • Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1098–1111. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1098
  • O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Lorch, R. F. (Eds.). (2015). Inferences during reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1200–1210.
  • Omanson, R. C. (1982). An analysis of narratives: Identifying central, supportive, and distracting content. Discourse Processes, 5(3-4), 195–224. doi: 10.1080/01638538209544543
  • Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. In C. Brown, & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 167–208). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Rayner, K., Kambe, G., & Duffy, S. A. (2000). The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 53(4), 1061–1080. doi: 10.1080/713755934
  • Rugg, M. D., & Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(6), 251–257. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.004
  • Schumacher, P. B., & Hung, Y. C. (2012). Positional influences on information packaging: Insights from topological fields in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(2), 295–310. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.05.006
  • Stafura, J. Z., & Perfetti, C. A. (2014). Word-to-text integration: Message level and lexical level influences in ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 64, 41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.012
  • Stafura, J. Z., Rickles, B., & Perfetti, C. A. (2015). ERP evidence for memory and predictive mechanisms in word-to-text integration. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(10), 1273–1290. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1062119
  • StGeorge, M., Mannes, S., & Hoffman, J. E. (1994). Global semantic expectancy and language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1), 70–83. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.70
  • StGeorge, M., Mannes, S., & Hoffman, J. E. (1997). Individual differences in inference generation: An ERP analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(6), 776–787. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.776
  • Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 77–110. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90005-6
  • Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. W. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612–630. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90049-X
  • Tucker, D. M. (1993). Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: The geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 87(3), 154–163. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90121-B
  • Tyler, L. K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1977). The on-line effects of semantic context on syntactic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(6), 683–692. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80027-3
  • Van Berkum, J. J., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 657–671. doi: 10.1162/089892999563724
  • van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539–588). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • van den Broek, P. W., Helder, A., & Van Leijenhorst, L. (2013). Sensitivity to structural centrality: Developmental and individual differences in reading comprehension skills. In M. A. Britt, S. R. Goldman, & J.-F. Rouet (Eds.), Reading: From words to multiple texts (pp. 132–146). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
  • van den Broek, P., & Trabasso, T. (1986). Causal networks versus goal hierarchies in summarizing text. Discourse Processes, 9(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1080/01638538609544628
  • Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Van Petten, C. (1993). A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 485–531. doi: 10.1080/01690969308407586
  • Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 380–393. doi: 10.3758/BF03197127
  • Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
  • Warren, T., White, S. J., & Reichle, E. D. (2009). Investigating the causes of wrap-up effects: Evidence from eye movements and E–Z reader. Cognition, 111(1), 132–137. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.011
  • Yang, C. L., Perfetti, C. A., & Schmalhofer, F. (2007). Event-related potential indicators of text integration across sentence boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 55–89.
  • Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.