Interactionism in language: from neural networks to bodies to dyads

References

• Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 419–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y. (2007). The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 502–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30(3), 191–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. E., Huette, S., Matlock, T., & Spivey, M. J. (2010). On the temporal dynamics of negated perceptual simulations. In M. Turner, F. Parrill, & V. Tobin (Eds.), Meaning, form, and body. (pp. 1–20). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. L., Richardson, M. J., & Chemero, A. (2012). Eroding the boundaries of cognition: Implications of embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 717–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 76, B13–B26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Language comprehension: Archival memory or preparation for situated action? Discourse Processes, 28, 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsky, S., Tuller, B., & Shapiro, L. P. (1998). ‘How to milk a coat:’ The effects of semantic and acoustic information on phoneme categorization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 2670–2676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), 355–363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004). Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science, 304(5679), 1926–1929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, P. W., Goldrick, M., & Smolensky, P. (2017). Incremental parsing in a continuous dynamical system: Sentence processing in gradient symbolic computation. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(1), 20160105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (2012). Spoken discourse and its emergence. In Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 541–557). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coey, C. A., Varlet, M., & Richardson, M. J. (2012). Coordination dynamics in a socially situated nervous system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connine, C. M. (1987). Constraints on interactive processes in auditory word recognition: The role of sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(5), 527–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6(1), 84–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, R., Fusaroli, R., Duran, N., & Richardson, D. C. (2013). The self-organization of human interaction. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 59, 43–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, R., & Kello, C. T. (2018). “How do humans make sense?” Multiscale dynamics and emergent meaning. New Ideas in Psychology, 50, 61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2006). Unraveling the dyad: Using recurrence analysis to explore patterns of syntactic coordination between children and caregivers in conversation. Language Learning, 56(3), 391–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran, N. D., Dale, R., Kello, C. T., Street, C. N., & Richardson, D. C. (2013). Exploring the movement dynamics of deception. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14(2), 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. Cooper, & E. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 27–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K. (2016). Investigating conversational dynamics: Interactive alignment, interpersonal synergy, and collective task performance. Cognitive Science, 40(1), 145–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganong, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6(1), 110–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105(2), 251–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, C. L., Spivey, M. J., & Balasubramaniam, R. (2017). Corticospinal excitability during the processing of handwritten and typed words and non-words. Neuroscience Letters, 651, 232–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GowJr., D. W., & Olson, B. B. (2016). Sentential influences on acoustic-phonetic processing: A Granger causality analysis of multimodal imaging data. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(7), 841–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groppe, D. M., Choi, M., Huang, T., Schilz, J., Topkins, B., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2010). The phonemic restoration effect reveals pre-N400 effect of supportive sentence context in speech perception. Brain Research, 1361, 54–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossberg, S. (2013). Adaptive resonance theory: How a brain learns to consciously attend, learn, and recognize a changing world. Neural Networks, 37, 1–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guediche, S., Salvata, C., & Blumstein, S. E. (2013). Temporal cortex reflects effects of sentence context on phonetic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(5), 706–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Giraud, A. L., & Clarke, A. (2017). Brain oscillations in language comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32, 533–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacoboni, M. (2008). The role of premotor cortex in speech perception: Evidence from fMRI and rTMS. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1-3), 31–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, E., & Trueswell, J. C. (2008). Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(5), 709–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, C. T., & Van Orden, G. C. (2009). Soft-assembly of sensorimotor function. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 13(1), 57–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. S. (1997). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, D. (2015). Are the motor features of verb meanings represented in the precentral motor cortices? Yes, but within the context of a flexible, multilevel architecture for conceptual knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 1068–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, D., & Gonzalez-Castillo, J. (2010). The two-level theory of verb meaning: An approach to integrating the semantics of action with the mirror neuron system. Brain and Language, 112(1), 54–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, D., & Tranel, D. (2000). A double dissociation between linguistic and perceptual representations of spatial relationships. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(5), 393–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2006). The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 481–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoeferle, P., Habets, B., Crocker, M. W., & Münte, T. F. (2007). Visual scenes trigger immediate syntactic reanalysis: Evidence from ERPs during situated spoken comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 18(4), 789–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoeferle, P., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2011). Comprehending how visual context influences incremental sentence comprehension: Insights from erps and picture-sentence verification. Psychophysiology, 48, 495–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlen, A. K., Allefeld, C., & Haynes, J. D. (2012). Content-specific coordination of listeners’ to speakers’ EEG during communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, K. J., Bastiaansen, M. C., Dijkstra, T., & Rueschemeyer, S. A. (2017). Making sense: Motor activation and action plausibility during sentence processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 590–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebois, L. A., Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., & Barsalou, L. W. (2015). Are automatic conceptual cores the gold standard of semantic processing? The context-dependence of spatial meaning in grounded congruency effects. Cognitive Science, 39(8), 1764–1801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. G., Schoffelen, J. M., Hoffmann, C., Bastiaansen, M., & Schriefers, H. (2017). Discourse-level semantic coherence influences beta oscillatory dynamics and the N400 during sentence comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1404–1426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1), 71–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B., & Griffith, T. (1995). Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 134–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., & Spivey, M. J. (2003). Probabilistic constraint satisfaction at the lexical/phonetic interface: Evidence for gradient effects of within-category VOT on lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 77–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen, J. M., Jesse, A., & Norris, D. (2009). No lexical–prelexical feedback during speech perception or: Is it time to stop playing those Christmas tapes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 283–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., Heise, G. A., & Lichten, W. (1951). The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(5), 329–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & van Berkum, J. J. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1098–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review, 115(2), 357–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(3), 299–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obleser, J., & Kotz, S. A. (2010). Expectancy constraints in degraded speech modulate the language comprehension network. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 633–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obleser, J., Wise, R. J. S., Dresner, A. M., & Scott, S. K. (2007). Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 2283–2289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onnis, L., & Spivey, M. J. (2012). Toward a new scientific visualization for the language sciences. Information, 3(1), 124–150.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo, J. S. (2013). Measuring phonetic convergence in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, A., & Dale, R. (2013). Argument disrupts interpersonal synchrony. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2092–2102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, A., Carreiras, M., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2017). Brain-to-brain entrainment: EEG interbrain synchronization while speaking and listening. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 4190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pisoni, D. B., & Tash, J. (1974). Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories. Perception, & Psychophysics, 15(2), 285–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C. (1995). Double dissociation without modularity: Evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17(2), 291–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21(3), 793–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Huss, M., Kherif, F., del Prado Martin, F. M., Hauk, O., & Shtyrov, Y. (2006). Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(20), 7865–7870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination. Psychological Science, 18(5), 407–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W., & McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27(5), 767–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., & Cheung, J. (2001). Motor representations in memory and mental models: Embodiment in cognition. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 867–872). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rommers, J., Dickson, D. S., Norton, J. J., Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2017). Alpha and theta band dynamics related to sentential constraint and word expectancy. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 576–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, volume 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71(2), 109–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shockley, K., Santana, M. V., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 326–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolensky, P. (2006). Harmony in linguistic cognition. Cognitive Science, 30(5), 779–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolensky, P., Goldrick, M., & Mathis, D. (2014). Optimization and quantization in gradient symbol systems: A framework for integrating the continuous and the discrete in cognition. Cognitive Science, 38(6), 1102–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49(3), 238–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spevack, S. C., Falandays, J. B., Batzloff, B. J., & Spivey, M. J. (2018). Interactivity of language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(7), e12282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivey, M. J., & Spevack, S. C. (2017). An inclusive account of mind across spatiotemporal scales of cognition. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 1(1), 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Spivey, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: Modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1521–1543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivey-Knowlton, M. J. (1996). Integration of visual and linguistic information: Human data and model simulations (Doctoral dissertation). University of Rochester, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2011). Word recognition and syntactic attachment in reading: Evidence for a staged architecture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 407–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steedman, M., & Altmann, G. (1989). Ambiguity in context: A reply. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3/4), SI105–SI122.
   Google Scholar
• Strogatz, S. (2004). Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order. London: Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Tabor, W., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1999). Dynamical models of sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 23(4), 491–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 443–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J., De Goede, D., Van Alphen, P., Mulder, E., & Kerstholt, J. H. (2013). How robust is the language architecture? The case of mood. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 657–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., & Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(3), 331–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C., & Kloos, H. (2003). The module mistake. Cortex, 39(1), 164–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 167(3917), 392–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, R. M., & Casasanto, D. (2011). Flexibility in embodied language understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, R. M., & Francken, J. C. (2012). Embodied cognition: Taking the next step. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(1), 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimi, J. (2012). Active internalism and open dynamical systems. Philosophical Psychology, 25(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(5), 229–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar