The online processing of noun phrase ellipsis and mechanisms of antecedent retrieval

References

• Acuña-Fariña, J. C., Meseguer, E., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Gender and number agreement in comprehension in Spanish. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale, 143, 108–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arregui, A., Clifton, C., Frazier, L., & Moulton, K. (2006). Processing elided verb phrases with flawed antecedents: The recycling hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 232–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-Effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep It maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html. R package version
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, S. M., Shapiro, L. P., & Love, T. (2010). Parallelism effects and verb activation: The sustained reactivation hypothesis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(2), 101–118. doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9128-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, C. J., Frazier, L., & Deevy, P. (1999). Feature manipulation in sentence comprehension. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–39.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, S. (1994). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. W., & Bunger, A. C. (2011). Comprehension of elided structure: Evidence from sluicing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(1), 63–78. doi: 10.1080/01690961003691074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., & Phillips, C. (2013). Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(2), 85–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, A. (2011). Ibex Farm, Online server: spellout.net/ibexfarm
   Google Scholar
• Foraker, S., & McElree, B. (2007). The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(3), 357–383. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., Antón-Méndez, I., Collina, S., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2008). The interplay of syntax and form in sentence production: A cross-linguistic study of form effects on agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(3), 329–374. doi: 10.1080/01690960701467993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. (2008). Processing ellipsis: A processing solution to the undergeneration problem? In C. B. Chang, & H. J. Haynie (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th west coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 21–32). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. J. (2001). Parsing coordinates and ellipsis: Copy α. Syntax (Oxford, England), 4(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-9612.00034
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., Munn, A., & Clifton, C. (2000). Processing coordinate structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(4), 343–370. doi: 10.1023/a:1005156427600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27(6), 1411–1423. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.6.1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2004). Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 97–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Johnson, M., & Lee, Y. (2006). Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 32(6), 1304–1321. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankamer, J., & Sag, I. (1976). Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7, 391–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., Schriefers, H. J., Bock, K., & Kikstra, G. M. (2003). Morphophonological influences on the construction of subject-verb agreement. Memory & Cognition, 31(8), 1316–1326. doi: 10.3758/BF03195814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornstein, N., & Lightfoot, D. (1981). Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition. London; New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or Not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228–238. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazanina, N., Lau, E. F., Lieberman, M., Yoshida, M., & Phillips, C. (2007). The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(3), 384–409. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehler, A. (2000). Coherence and the resolution of ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23(6), 533–575. doi: 10.1023/a:1005677819813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C. S., Kobele, G. M., Runner, J. T., & Hale, J. T. (2011). The acceptability cline in VP-ellipsis. Syntax (oxford, England), 14, 318–354.
   Google Scholar
• Kush, D. (2013). Respecting relations: Memory access and antecedent retrieval in incremental sentence processing. In C. Phillips, N. Hornstein, M. Israel, E. Lau, & J. Lidz (Eds.): ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kush, D., & Phillips, C. (2014). Local anaphor licensing in an SOV language: Implications for retrieval strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lago, S., Shalom, D. E., Sigman, M., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2015). Agreement attraction in spanish comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 82, 133–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L. (1996). Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(1), 93–115. doi: 10.1007/bf01708421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 375–419. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidz, J., Waxman, S., & Freedman, J. (2003). What infants know about syntax but couldn't have learned: Experimental evidence for syntactic structure at Age 18 months. Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Science, 89(3), 295–303. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00116-1
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, D. (1989). The child's trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(2), 321–334. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00048883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E., & McElree, B. (2008). A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 879–906. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E., & McElree, B. (2009). Memory operations that support language comprehension: Evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning. Memory and Cognition, 35(5), 1231–1239. doi: 10.1037/a0016271
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E., & McElree, B. (2011). Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from sluicing. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(4), 327–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B. (2000). Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), 111–123. doi: 10.1023/A:1005184709695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B., & Dosher, B. A. (1989). Serial position and Set size in short-term-memory - the time course of recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(4), 346–373. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.118.4.346 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.118.4.346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 67–91. Pii S0749-596x(02)00515-6. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596x(02)00515-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, J., Forster, K. I., & Veres, C. (1997). Subject-verb agreement processes in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(4), 569–587. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.2497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, D., & Phillips, C. (2017). Reflexive attraction in comprehension is selective. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 272–290. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., & Husband, E. M. (2016). Misinterpretations in agreement and agreement attraction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), 950–971. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.992445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J., Pullum, G. K., Scholz, B. C., & Berlage, E. (2013). Anaphoric one and its implications. Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America, 89(4), 794–829. doi: 10.1353/lan.2013.0071
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, L., & Lidz, J. (2013). Parameters in language acquisition. The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics. In K. Grohmann, & C. Boeckx (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., & Bock, K. (1999). Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(3), 427–456. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., Wagers, M., & Lau, E. F. (2011). Grammatical illusions adn selective fallibility in real-time language comprehension. Syntax and Semantics 37: Experiments at the Interfaces, 37(2011), 53–186. doi: 10.1108/S0092-4563(2011)0000037009
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, J., Wolfinger, K., Spellman, L., & Shapiro, L. P. (2010). The real-time processing of sluiced sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(5), 411–427.
   Google Scholar
• Rohde, D. (2003). Linger: a flexible platform for language processing experiments, version 2.94, Online: http://tedlab.mit.edu/~dr/Linger
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. P., Hestvik, A., Lesan, L., & Garcia, A. R. (2003). Charting the time-course of VP-ellipsis sentence comprehension: Evidence for an initial and independent structural analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00026-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), 542–562. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00536-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, P., Keller, F., & Dubey, A. (2010). Syntactic priming in comprehension: Parallelism effects with and without coordination. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(4), 333–351. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., & Carlson, G. N. (1990). Comprehension of deep and surface verbphrase anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5(4), 257–280. doi: 10.1080/01690969008407064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, D., Grey, S., & van Hell, J. G. (2017). Dissociating retrieval interference and reanalysis in the P600 during sentence comprehension. Psychophysiology, 54(2), 248–259. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, D., Nicol, J., & Brehm, L. (2014). The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 195–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Plausibility and grammatical agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(4), 740–759. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596x(03)00003-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. A. (2007). Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 33(2), 407–430. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. A., & Lewis, R. L. (2003). Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(3), 285–316. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596x(03)00081-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B. (2006). Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B. (2011). Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(3), 247–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C. (1995). Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(2), 186–215. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., & Franck, J. (1999). When Sex and syntax Go hand in hand: Gender agreement in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(4), 455–478. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., & Zilli, T. (1999). Syntactic accuracy in sentence production: Gender disagreement in Italian language impaired and unimpaired speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 623. doi: 10.1023/A:1023268911312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), 206–237. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar