The impact of variety of episodic contexts on the integration of novel words into semantic network

References

• Amsel, B. D. (2011). Tracking real-time neural activation of conceptual knowledge using single-trial event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 970–983. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsel, B. D., & Cree, G. S. (2013). Semantic richness, concreteness, and object domain: An electrophysiological study. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 67(2), 117. doi: 10.1037/a0029807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias-Trejo, N., & Plunkett, K. (2013). What’s in a link: Associative and taxonomic priming effects in the infant lexicon. Cognition, 128(2), 214–227. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batterink, L., & Neville, H. (2011). Implicit and explicit mechanisms of word learning in a narrative context: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3181–3196. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & McCaslin, E. S. (1983). Vocabulary development: All contexts are not created equal. The Elementary School Journal, 83(3), 177–181. doi: 10.1086/461307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedny, M., Dravida, S., & Saxe, R. (2014). Shindigs, brunches, and rodeos: The neural basis of event words. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(3), 891–901. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0217-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger, D. J., Balass, M., Landen, E., & Perfetti, C. A. (2008). Context variation and definitions in learning the meanings of words: An instance-based learning approach. Discourse Processes, 45(2), 122–159. doi: 10.1080/01638530701792826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., & Caramelli, N. (2003). Situation bounded conceptual organization in children: From action to spatial relations. Cognitive Development, 18(1), 49–60. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00161-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Kutas, M. (2012). Once is enough: N400 indexes semantic integration of novel word meanings from a single exposure in context. Language Learning and Development, 8(3), 278–302. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2011.614893
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borovsky, A., Kutas, M., & Elman, J. L. (2010). Learning to use words: Event-related potentials index single-shot contextual word learning. Cognition, 116(2), 289–296. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borovsky, A., Kutas, M., & Elman, J. L. (2013). Getting it right: Word learning across the hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 51(5), 825–837. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouaffre, S., & Faita-Ainseba, F. (2007). Hemispheric differences in the time-course of semantic priming processes: Evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs). Brain and Cognition, 63(2), 123–135. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11(2), 177–220. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(79)90009-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, L., Westbury, C., & Burgess, C. (2001). Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 531–544. doi: 10.3758/BF03196189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e10729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S., & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 15, 17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Wang, L., & Yang, Y. (2014). Acquiring concepts and features of novel words by two types of learning: Direct mapping and inference. Neuropsychologia, 56, 204–218. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, F., Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2007). Teaching adults new words: The role of practice and consolidation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(5), 970–976. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambacher, M., Rolfs, M., Göllner, K., Kliegl, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Event-related potentials reveal rapid verification of predicted visual input. PLoS ONE, 4(3), e5047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Zubicaray, G. I., Hansen, S., & McMahon, K. L. (2013). Differential processing of thematic and categorical conceptual relations in spoken word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 131–142. doi: 10.1037/a0028717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, J., Chen, S., Wang, L., & Yang, Y. (2017). Thematic and taxonomic relations of novel words learned from action and perceptual features. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 41, 70–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2015). Implicit and explicit learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, Z., Golonka, S., & Jones, L. L. (2011). Thematic thinking: The apprehension and consequences of thematic relations. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 54, 249–294. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00008-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, J., & Schnur, T. T. (2016). Role of features and categories in the organization of object knowledge: Evidence from adaptation fMRI. Cortex, 78, 174–194. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldwater, M. B., Markman, A. B., & Stilwell, C. H. (2011). The empirical case for role-governed categories. Cognition, 118(3), 359–376. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, D. B., & Scott, M. S. (1986). Young children's preference for complementary pairs: Evidence against a shift to a taxonomic preference. Developmental Psychology, 22(1), 19–21. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.22.1.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, N., McGregor, K. K., & Graham, A. (2007). Conceptual organization at 6 and 8 years of age: Evidence from the semantic priming of object decisions. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50(1), 161–176. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/014)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. NeuroImage, 30(4), 1383–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heibeck, T. H., & Markman, E. M. (1987). Word learning in children: An examination of fast mapping. Child Development, 58, 1021–1034. doi: 10.2307/1130543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, T. T., Maouene, J., Riordan, B., & Smith, L. B. (2010). The associative structure of language: Contextual diversity in early word learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(3), 259–273. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K. (2008). Fast mapping but poor retention by 24-month-old infants. Infancy, 13(2), 128–157. doi: 10.1080/15250000701795598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalénine, S., Peyrin, C., Pichat, C., Segebarth, C., Bonthoux, F., & Baciu, M. (2009). The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: A behavioral and fMRI study. NeuroImage, 44(3), 1152–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48(7), 805–825. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounios, J., Green, D. L., Payne, L., Fleck, J. I., Grondin, R., & McRae, K. (2009). Semantic richness and the activation of concepts in semantic memory: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1282, 95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounios, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (1994). Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 804–823. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. doi: 10.1126/science.7350657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Van Petten, C. (1994). Psycholinguistics electrified. Handbook of psycholinguistics. New York: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933. doi: 10.1038/nrn2532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, E. L., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). Thematic relations in adults’ concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(1), 3–28. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, E. M. (1981). Two different principles of conceptual organization. In M. E. Lamb, & A. L. Brown (Eds.), Advances in Developmental Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Markman, E. M. (1989). Categorization and naming in children: Problems of induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markman, E. M., & Hutchinson, J. E. (1984). Children’s sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology, 16(1), 1–27. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(84)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7(7), 703–704. doi: 10.1038/nn1264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K. (2012). Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning. Psychological Review, 119(4), 831–877. doi: 10.1037/a0029872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(3), 283–312. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mestres-Missé, A., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Münte, T. F. (2007). Watching the brain during meaning acquisition. Cerebral Cortex, 17(8), 1858–1866. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mestres-Missé, A., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Münte, T. F. (2010). Neural differences in the mapping of verb and noun concepts onto novel words. NeuroImage, 49(3), 2826–2835. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D., & Graziano, K. M. (2012a). Damage to temporo-parietal cortex decreases incidental activation of thematic relations during spoken word comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1990–1997. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.02 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D., & Graziano, K. M. (2012b). Individual differences in the strength of taxonomic versus thematic relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 601–609. doi: 10.1037/a0026451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D., Landrigan, J.-F., & Britt, A. E. (2017). Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems. Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 499–520. doi: 10.1037/bul0000092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovitch, M., Nadel, L., Winocur, G., Gilboa, A., & Rosenbaum, R. S. (2006). The cognitive neuroscience of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(2), 179–190. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, O., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different? Psychophysiology, 47(3), 455–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00960.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L. (2001). Causes of taxonomic sorting by adults: A test of the thematic-to-taxonomic shift. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(4), 834–839. doi: 10.3758/BF03196225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L. (2010). What are categories and concepts. The Making of Human Concepts, 11–28. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549221.003.02
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233–253. doi: 10.2307/747758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, S. P., & Murphy, G. L. (2003). An apple is more than just a fruit: Cross-classification in children’s concepts. Child Development, 74(6), 1783–1806. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00638.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, I. S., Edwards, J. D., Henry, L. C., & Goodyear, B. G. (2007). The neural consequences of semantic richness. Psychological Science, 18(5), 401–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01913.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Hauk, O. (2009). Understanding in an instant: Neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain. Brain and Language, 110(2), 81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabovsky, M., Sommer, W., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2012a). Depth of conceptual knowledge modulates visual processes during word reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 990–1005. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabovsky, M., Sommer, W., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2012b). The time course of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(11). doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1988). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Kimberg, D. Y., Walker, G. M., Brecher, A., Faseyitan, O. K., Dell, G. S., … Coslett, H. B. (2011). Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(20), 8520–8524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014935108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segalowitz, S. J., & Zheng, X. (2009). An ERP study of category priming: Evidence of early lexical semantic access. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 122–129. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23(6), 695–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skotko, B. G., Kensinger, E. A., Locascio, J. J., Einstein, G., Rubin, D. C., Tupler, L. A., … Corkin, S. (2004). Puzzling thoughts for H. M.: Can new semantic information be anchored to old semantic memories? Neuropsychology, 18(4), 756–769. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.4.756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiley, S. S., & Brown, A. L. (1979). Conceptual preference for thematic or taxonomic relations: A nonmonotonic age trend from preschool to old age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28(2), 249–257. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(79)90087-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, K., & Keil, F. C. (1991). Early differentiation of causal mechanisms appropriate to biological and nonbiological kinds. Child Development, 62(4), 767–781. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01568.x doi: 10.2307/1131176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, L. R., & Knowlton, B. J. (1995). Memory, hippocampus, and brain systems. (M. S. Gazzaniga, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanborn, M. S., & De Glopper, K. (1999). Incidental word learning while reading: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(3), 261–285. doi: 10.3102/00346543069003261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamminen, J., & Gaskell, M. G. (2013). Novel word integration in the mental lexicon: Evidence from unmasked and masked semantic priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(5), 1001–1025. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.724694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, L. K., & Moss, H. E. (2001). Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 244–252. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01651-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, L. K., Stamatakis, E. A., Bright, P., Acres, K., Abdallah, S., Rodd, J., & Moss, H. (2004). Processing objects at different levels of specificity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(3), 351–362. doi: 10.1162/089892904322926692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ven, F., Takashima, A., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Learning word meanings: Overnight integration and study modality effects. PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0124926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kesteren, M. T., Rijpkema, M., Ruiter, D. J., Morris, R. G., & Fernández, G. (2014). Building on prior knowledge: Schema-dependent encoding processes relate to academic performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(10), 2250–2261. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara-Martínez, M., Comesaña, M., & Perea, M. (2017). The ERP signature of the contextual diversity effect in visual word recognition. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(3), 461–474. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0491-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, E. A. (2017). Individual and developmental differences in preschoolers’ categorization biases and vocabulary across tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 153, 35–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waxman, S., & Gelman, R. (1986). Preschoolers’ use of superordinate relations in classification and language. Cognitive Development, 1(2), 139–156. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(86)80016-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waxman, S. R., & Namy, L. L. (1997). Challenging the notion of a thematic preference in young children. Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 555. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.33.3.555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, E., Chrysikou, E. G., Hoffman, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2013). Manual experience shapes object representations. Psychological Science, 24(6), 909–919. doi: 10.1177/0956797612464658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2007). Rapid word learning under uncertainty via cross-situational statistics. Psychological Science, 18(5), 414–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01915.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Chen, S., Wang, L., Yang, X., & Yang, Y. (2017). Episodic specificity in acquiring thematic knowledge of novel words from descriptive episodes. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 488. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00488 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar