Lexical prediction in language comprehension: a replication study of grammatical gender effects in Dutch

References

• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2017). Goals and strategies influence lexical prediction during sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 203–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, W.-Y., & Chen, D. (2018). Listeners rapidly use unexpected information to update their predictions: Evidence from eye-movements. Poster presented at the 31st annual CUNY sentence processing conference, Davis, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dambacher, M., Dimigen, O., Braun, M., Wille, K., Jacobs, A. M., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Stimulus onset asynchrony and the timeline of word recognition: Event-related potentials during sentence reading. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1852–1870. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney-Busch, N., Morgan, E., Lau, E., & Kuperberg, G. (2017). Comprehenders rationally adapt semantic predictions to the statistics of the local environment: A Bayesian model of trial-by-trial N400 amplitudes. In Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the cognitive science society, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, P. T., & Kutas, M. (2017). Concerns with Nieuwland et al. 2017. Retrieved from http://kutaslab.ucsd.edu/FinalDUK17Comment9LabStudy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121. doi: 10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand: Processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 353–387. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39(2), 133–146. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3920133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research 1626. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, A., Corley, M., Pickering, M. J., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2016). Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 157–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, A., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2017a). How robust are prediction effects in language comprehension? Failure to replicate article-elicited N400 effects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 954–965. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1242761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, A., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2017b). Why the A/AN prediction effect may be hard to replicate: A rebuttal to Delong, Urbach, and Kutas (2017). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 974–983. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1323112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 773–795. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Lai, V. (2012). Rapid interactions between lexical semantic and word form analysis during word recognition in context: Evidence from ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(5), 1104–1112. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochari, A. (2015). Mediating factors in predictive language processing: An EEG study on the effects of working memory, inhibitory control and processing speed (Master’s Thesis). Utrecht University. Retrieved from https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/318532
   Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurumada, C., Brown, M., Bibyk, S., Pontillo, D. F., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2014). Is it or isn’t it: Listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings. Cognition, 133(2), 335–342. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. doi: 10.1126/science.7350657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163. doi: 10.1038/307161a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(3), 326–338. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2013). Dissociating N400 effects of prediction from association in single-word contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(3), 484–502. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Weber, K., Gramfort, A., Hämäläinen, M. S., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2016). Spatiotemporal signatures of lexical–semantic prediction. Cerebral Cortex, 26(4), 1377–1387. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., & Gaspelin, N. (2017). How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn’t). Psychophysiology, 54(1), 146–157. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metusalem, R., Kutas, M., Urbach, T. P., Hare, M., McRae, K., & Elman, J. L. (2012). Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 545–567. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. (2015). The truth before and after: Brain potentials reveal automatic activation of event knowledge during sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(11), 2215–2228. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., Politzer-Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., … Huettig, F. (2018). Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension. eLife, 7, e33468. doi: 10.7554/eLife.33468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011). Fieldtrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. doi: 10.1155/2011/156869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, M. (2008). Discourse-based lexical anticipation: The nature and contextual basis of predictions in language comprehension (PhD Thesis). University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Otten, M., Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. (2007). Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language. BMC Neuroscience, 8(1), 89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2008). Discourse-based word anticipation during language processing: Prediction or priming? Discourse Processes, 45(6), 464–496. doi: 10.1080/01638530802356463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2009). Does working memory capacity affect the ability to predict upcoming words in discourse? Brain Research, 1291, 92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800737
   Google Scholar
• Rommers, J., & Federmeier, K. D. (2018). Electrophysiological methods. In A. M. B. de Groot, & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Research methods in psycholinguistics and the neurobiology of language: A practical guide (pp. 247–265). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schlueter, Z., Namyst, A., & Lau, E. (2018). Predicting discourse status: N400 effects of determiner expectation. Poster presented at the 31st annual CUNY sentence processing conference, Davis, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Shetter, W. Z. (1959). The Dutch diminutive. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 58(1), 75–90. doi: 10.2307/27707226
   Google Scholar
• Simonsohn, U. (2015). Small telescopes. Psychological Science, 26(5), 559–569. doi: 10.1177/0956797614567341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szewczyk, J. M. (2018). Prediction-inconsistent information leads to prediction updating – an ERP study on sentence comprehension. Talk given at the 31st annual CUNY sentence processing conference, Davis, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Szewczyk, J. M., & Schriefers, H. (2013). Prediction in language comprehension beyond specific words: An ERP study on sentence comprehension in Polish. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(4), 297–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632–1634. doi: 10.1126/science.7777863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 443–467. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014). Bayesian tests to quantify the result of a replication attempt. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1457–1475. doi: 10.1037/a0036731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Bates, E. A., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Potato not pope: Human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences. Neuroscience Letters, 346(3), 165–168. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00599-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Expecting gender: An event related brain potential study on the role of grammatical gender in comprehending a line drawing within a written sentence in spanish. Cortex, 39(3), 483–508. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70260-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288. doi: 10.1162/0898929041920487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2015). Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading. Cortex, 68, 20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, S., Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2017). Prediction (Or Not) during language processing: A commentary On Nieuwland et al. (2017) and Delong et al. (2005). bioRxiv, 143750. doi: 10.1101/143750
   Google Scholar