When morphological structure overrides meaning: evidence from German prefix and particle verbs

References

• Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. doi: 10.21500/20112084.807
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (on CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. (2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News, 5(1), 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effect models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0.
   Google Scholar
• Behrens, H. (1998). How difficult are complex verbs? Evidence from German, Dutch and English. Linguistics, 36(4), 679–712. doi: 10.1515/ling.1998.36.4.679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (2000). Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 390–405. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bick, A. S., Goelman, G., & Frost, R. (2011). Hebrew brain vs. English brain: Language Modulates the Way it is processed. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2280–2290. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, Paul. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2004). Allomorphic variation in Arabic: Implications for lexical processing and representation. Brain and Language, 90, 106–116. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00424-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 329–365. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2005). Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1/2), 75–114. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000197
   Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory and Cognition, 37(6), 895–908. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressler, W. U. (2007). Productivity in word formation. In G. Jarema & G. Libben (Eds.), The mental lexicon: Core perspectives (pp. 159–183). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dudenredaktion. (2009). Die deutsche Rechtschreibung. Das umfassende Standardwerk auf der Grundlage der neuen amtlichen Regeln (25th ed). Mannheim: Duden verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, P. (2004). Grundriß der deutschen Grammatik: Das Wort (2nd ed. Vol. 1). Stuttgart-Weimar: J. B. Metzler.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., Barac-Cikoja, D., & Kostić, A. (2002). Semantic aspects of morphological processing: Transparency effects in Serbian. Memory and Cognition, 30, 629–636. doi: 10.3758/BF03194964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., & Larabee, J. (2001). Morphological facilitation following prefixed but not suffixed primes: Lexical architecture or modality-specific processes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 680–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., & Soltano, E. G. (1999). Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain and Language, 68, 33–39. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischer, W., & Barz, I. (1992). Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2009). Reading in Hebrew vs. Reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference? In K. Pugh & P. McCardle (Eds.), How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice (pp. 235–254). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(05), 1–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 323–345. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günther, F., Smolka, E., & Marelli, M. (in press). ‘Understanding’ differs between English and German: Capturing systematic language differences in complex words. Cortex. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.09.007
   Google Scholar
• Hajnal, I. (2004). Die Tmesis bei Homer und auf den mykenischen Linear B-Tafeln: Ein chronologisches Paradox? In J. H. W. Penney (Ed.), Indo-European perspectives. Studies in honour of Anna Morpurgo Davies (pp. 146–178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, J. (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everythingrelative? Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary. Journal of the Language Sciences, 39(6), 1041–1070.
   Google Scholar
• Jarema, G., & Nikolova, R. (2001). Interaction of morphological structure and prefix transparency in the processing of Bulgarian aspectual verb forms. Brain and Language, 81, 649–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klampfer, S. (2003). Emergence of verb paradigms in one Austrian child. In D. Bittner, W. U. Dressler, & M. Kilani-Schoch (Eds.), Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 297–321). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Leminen, A., Smolka, E., Pliatsikas, C., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (in press). Morphological processing in the brain: the good (inflection), the bad (derivation), and the ugly (compounding). Cortex. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016
   Google Scholar
• Libben, G. (2014). The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 8–25. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.874994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longtin, C., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313–334. doi: 10.1080/01690960244000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdeling, A. (2001). On particle verbs and similar constructions in German. Center for the Study of Language and Information. Stanford: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lüdeling, A., & de Jong, N. (2002). German particle verbs and word formation. In N. Dehé, R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre, & S. Urban (Eds.), Explorations in verb-particle constructions (pp. 315–334). Berlin: Mouton der Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2015). Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of orthography-semantics consistency on word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1571–1583. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.959709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., Gagné, C., & Spalding, T. (2017). Compounding as abstract operation in semantic space: Investigating relational effects through a large-scale, data-driven computational model. Cognition, 166, 207–224. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlsen-Wilson, W., Bozic, M., & Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(3), 394–421. doi: 10.1080/01690960701588004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mater, E. (1966). Deutsche Verben. Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy-Morrogh, M. (2006). Cambridge phrasal verbs dictionary (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milin, P., Smolka, E., & Feldman, L. B. (2017). Models of lexical access and morphological processing. In E. M. Fernández & H. S. Cairns (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 240–268). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, S. (1996). Partikelverben im Deutsch-Englischen Vergleich. In E. Lang & G. Zifonum (Eds.), Deutsch - typologisch (pp. 261–288). Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rueckl, J. G., & Galantucci, B. (2005). The locus and time course of long-term morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 115–138. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto, Y., Ishiguro, M., & Kitagawa, G. (1986). Akaike information criterion statistics. Dordrecht: KTK Scientific Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., & Eulitz, C. (2018). Psycholinguistic measures for German verb pairs: Semantic transparency, semantic relatedness, verb family size, and age of reading acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1540–1562. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1052-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Gondan, M., & Rösler, F. (2015). Take a stand on understanding: Electrophysiological evidence for stem access in German complex verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(62), doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Komlósi, S., & Rösler, F. (2009). When semantics means less than morphology: The processing of German prefixed verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(3), 337–375. doi: 10.1080/01690960802075497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., & Libben, G. (2017). ‘Can you wash off the hogwash?’ – semantic transparency of first and second constituents in the processing of German compounds. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(4), 514–531. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1256492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Preller, K., & Eulitz, C. (2014). ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer-Lolei, S., Mattes, V., Korecky-Kröll, K., & Dressler, W. U. (2018). Acquisition of German derivational morphology. In V. Mattes, S. Sommer-Lolei, K. Korecky-Kröll, & W. U. Dressler (Eds.), Acquisition of derivational morphology. (in preparation).
   Google Scholar
• Soto-Faraco, S., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Cutler, A. (2001). Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(3), 412–432. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2010). A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 277–296. doi: 10.1080/01690960903043261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Donselaar, W., Koster, M., & Cutler, A. (2005). Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(2), 251–273. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, C. (1963). Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the Old Irish verb. Celtica, 6, 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, B. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. arXiv:1308.5499. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1308.5499.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Taft, M. (2015). The effects of semantic transparency and base frequency on the recognition of English complex words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(3), 904–910.
   Google Scholar
• Zwitserlood, P., Bolwiender, A., & Drews, E. (2004). Priming morphologically complex verbs by sentence contexts: Effects of semantic transparency and ambiguity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 395–415. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000160
   Google Scholar