Conversational expectations get revised as response latencies unfold

References

• Bastiaansen, M., Linden, M. V. D., Keurs, M. T., Dijkstra, T., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Theta responses are involved in lexical-semantic retrieval during language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(3), 530–541. doi: 10.1162/0898929053279469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M., Magyari, L., & Hagoort, P. (2010). Syntactic unification operations are reflected in oscillatory dynamics during on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1333–1347. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M., Van Berkum, J., & Hagoort, P. (2002). Event-related theta power increases in the human EEG during online sentence processing. Neuroscience Letters, 323(1), 13–16. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02535-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Casillas, M., & Levinson, S. C. (2018). Planning versus comprehension in turn-taking: Fast responders show reduced anticipatory processing of the question. Neuropsychologia, 109, 295–310. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Kendrick, K. H., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Never say no … How the brain interprets the pregnant pause in conversation. Plos One, 10(12), e0145474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., & Levinson, S. C. (2017). The brain behind the response: Insights into turn-taking in conversation from neuroimaging. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 71–89. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2017.1262118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Magyari, L., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Neural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation. Scientific Reports, 5, 12881. doi: 10.1038/srep12881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2014). Approaches to grammar for interactional linguistics Pragmatics, 24, 623–647. doi: 10.1075/prag.24.3.08cou
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikker, S., & Pylkkänen, L. (2013). Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation. Brain and Language, 127(1), 55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischler, I., & Bradley, M. (2006). Event-related potential studies of language and emotion: Words, phrases, and task effects. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 185–203. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56009-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gisladottir, R. S., Bögels, S., & Levinson, S. C. (2018). Oscillatory brain responses reflect anticipation during comprehension of speech acts in spoken dialog. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 34. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisladottir, R. S., Chwilla, D. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Conversation electrified: ERP correlates of speech act recognition in underspecified utterances. Plos One, 10(3), e0120068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandke, T. (1983). Interpolation algorithms for discrete Fourier transforms of weighted signals. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 32(2), 350–355. doi: 10.1109/TIM.1983.4315077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304(5669), 438–441. doi: 10.1126/science.1095455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115(5), 1090–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldner, M., & Edlund, J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 555–568. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2010). Questioning in medicine. In A. F. Freed & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), “Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 42–68). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., & Holler, J. (2017). Gaze direction signals response preference in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 12–32. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2017.1262120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., & Torreira, F. (2015). The timing and construction of preference: A quantitative study. Discourse Processes, 52(4), 255–289. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kononowicz, T. W., & Penney, T. B. (2016). The contingent negative variation (CNV): Timing isn’t everything. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 8, 231–237. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornhuber, H. H., & Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale. Pflüger’s Archiv für die Gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 284(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1007/BF00412364
   Google Scholar
• Leuthold, H., Kunkel, A., Mackenzie, I. G., & Filik, R. (2015). Online processing of moral transgressions: ERP evidence for spontaneous evaluation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(8), 1021–1029. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1995). Interactional biases in human thinking. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction (pp. 221–260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2016). Turn-taking in human communication – Origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 6–14. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 731. doi:0.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG-and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2008). When the truth is not too hard to handle: An event-related potential study on the pragmatics of negation. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1213–1218. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02226.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostdijk, N. (2000). Het Corpus Gesproken Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 5, 280–284.
   Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011). Fieldtrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2011/156869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich, J., & Donchin, E. (1988). P300 and the word frequency effect. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 70(1), 33–45. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90192-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, F., Francis, A. L., & Morgan, M. (2006). The interaction of inter-turn silence with prosodic cues in listener perceptions of “trouble” in conversation. Speech Communication, 48(9), 1079–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, F., Margutti, P., & Takano, S. (2011). Judgments concerning the valence of inter-turn silence across speakers of American English, Italian, and Japanese. Discourse Processes, 48(5), 331–354. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2011.558002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 367–379. doi: 10.3758/BF03197126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport, 9(10), 2195–2200. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199807130-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35, 367–392. doi:10.1017/S004740450606017 doi: 10.1017/S0047404506060179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J., Holleman, B., Nieuwland, M., Otten, M., & Murre, J. (2009). Right or wrong? The brain’s fast response to morally objectionable statements. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1092–1099. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02411.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boxtel, G. J., & Böcker, K. B. (2004). Cortical measures of anticipation. Journal of Psychophysiology, 18(2/3), 61–76. doi: 10.1027/0269-8803.18.23.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boxtel, G. J. M., & Brunia, C. H. (1994). Motor and non-motor aspects of slow brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 38(1), 37–51. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(94)90048-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 380–393. doi: 10.3758/BF03197127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, W., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V., McCallum, W., & Winter, A. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electric sign of sensori-motor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 380–384. doi: 10.1038/203380a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar