When is the verb a potential gap site? The influence of filler maintenance on the active search for a gap

References

• Altmann, G. T. (1999). Thematic role assignment in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(1), 124–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Garnsey, S. M., & Carlson, G. N. (1995). Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 774–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, E., Gibson, E., & Wolf, F. (2005). Online syntactic storage costs in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(1), 144–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, W. Y., & Phillips, C. (2013). No semantic illusions in the “Semantic P600” phenomenon: ERP evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Brain Research, 1506, 76–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, S., & Fodor, J. D. (1985). How can grammars help parsers? In D. Dowty, L. Kartunnen, & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing (pp. 94–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(6), 725–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 250–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. (1978). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies (Doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Clifton Jr, C. (1989). Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(2), 93–126.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Flores D’Arcais, G. B. (1989). Filler–driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory of Language, 28, 331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 58–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnsey, S. M., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chapman, R. M. (1989). Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(1), 51–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennari, S. P., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 161–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1411–1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2004). Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeister, P., & Vasishth, S. (2014). Distinctiveness and encoding effects in online sentence comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennison, S. M. (2001). Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(1), 132–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word-and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2014). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models. R Package Version 2.0–11. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. W. (2004). Another look at the role of empty categories in sentence processing (and grammar). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33, 51–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linzen, T. (2009). Corpus of blog postings collected from the Israblog website. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.
   Google Scholar
• Love, T., & Swinney, D. (1996). Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions; demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(1), 5–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B. (2001). Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 817–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness, T., & Meltzer-Asscher, A. (2017). Working memory in the processing of long-distance dependencies: Interference and filler maintenance. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(6), 1353–1365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, J. L., Fodor, J. D., & Swinney, D. (1994). Using cross–modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 20, 1229–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2006). A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(4), 601–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omaki, A., Lau, E. F., Davidson White, I., Dakan, M. L., Apple, A., & Phillips, C. (2015). Hyper-active gap filling. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Abada, S. H. (2005). ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long–distance dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 407–428.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (1998). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 940–961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2001). Strategies for processing unbounded dependencies: Lexical information and verb-argument assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 27(6), 1401–1410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2003). Evidence against the use of subcategorisation frequency in the processing of unbounded dependencies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 469–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rohde, D. (2003). Linger: A flexible platform for language processing experiments.
   Google Scholar
• Stepanov, A., & Stateva, P. (2015). Cross-linguistic evidence for memory storage costs in filler-gap dependencies with wh-adjuncts. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowe, L. (1986). Parsing wh–constructions: Evidence for on–line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227–245.
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., & Pickering, M. J. (1996). Plausibility and the processing of Unbounded dependencies:An Eye-Tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 454–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(3), 528–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villata, S., Tabor, W., & Franck, J. (2018). Encoding and retrieval interference in sentence comprehension: Evidence from agreement. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., & Pendleton, E. (2016). Structuring expectation: Licensing animacy in relative clause comprehension. Proceedings of the 33rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 29–46).
   Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., & Phillips, C. (2009). Multiple dependencies and the role of the grammar in real-time comprehension. Journal of Linguistics, 45(2), 395–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., & Phillips, C. (2014). Going the distance: Memory and control processes in active dependency construction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(7), 1274–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar